I went to the website offered as backup to her predictions: emsnews.wordpress.com/ and this is the type of information I found on the site:
"In Europe, it is illegal to talk about the awful close similarity of Naziism with Zionism. But luckily for me, right now I have some freedom of speech. So I can deduce the obvious. More proof comes in every day, that the Jews in Israel are going insane and are very tempted to have a Final Solution. Obama and his new envoy will struggle to tame this beast but we shall see. Will AIPAC pull strings? Will the US media begin hammering Obama mercilessly? If he is fair, he is a dead man walking."
I am not sure, even after searching the site, if she is writing this stuff, or it belongs to others, but she is using the site as evidence in her favor so I start there. I couldn't even find anything particularly about her and her views, so I am not sure the site supports her at all. However, again, she cites it, so I am assuming it comports with her views. Maybe not, and she would do well to explain that connection.
But the use of this site by her at all says something to me about her state of mind and presents a question of credibility in the first place.
-
I went to the website offered as backup to her predictions: emsnews.wordpress.com/ and this is the type of information I found on the site:
Jan 31 21:30 pm
|Rating:
+1
0
All Comments by LouieK »WSJ Weighs in on Peter Schiff [View article]
"In Europe, it is illegal to talk about the awful close similarity of Naziism with Zionism. But luckily for me, right now I have some freedom of speech. So I can deduce the obvious. More proof comes in every day, that the Jews in Israel are going insane and are very tempted to have a Final Solution. Obama and his new envoy will struggle to tame this beast but we shall see. Will AIPAC pull strings? Will the US media begin hammering Obama mercilessly? If he is fair, he is a dead man walking."
I am not sure, even after searching the site, if she is writing this stuff, or it belongs to others, but she is using the site as evidence in her favor so I start there. I couldn't even find anything particularly about her and her views, so I am not sure the site supports her at all. However, again, she cites it, so I am assuming it comports with her views. Maybe not, and she would do well to explain that connection.
But the use of this site by her at all says something to me about her state of mind and presents a question of credibility in the first place.