<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Sharif Galal's Comments</title>
    <description>Sharif Galal's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/2471871/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Tesla: A 'Can Do No Wrong' Investor Attitude May Signal An 'Apple-Like' Top</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1448271/comments?source=feed#comment-19046311</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19046311</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Tesla can barely manage to make it from quarter to quarter with out squeezing cash out of shorts or diluting shareholders in one way or another... <br/><br/>I'm all for TSLA and the longs that have latched on to the company and are keeping it at all time phenomenal highs but fear they get quite the shock when if thing tarnishes the sterling reputation of the Model S or if reality sets in of the market cap being a nonsensical ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 17:43:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Tesla can barely manage to make it from quarter to quarter with out squeezing cash out of shorts or diluting shareholders in one way or another... <br/><br/>I'm all for TSLA and the longs that have latched on to the company and are keeping it at all time phenomenal highs but fear they get quite the shock when if thing tarnishes the sterling reputation of the Model S or if reality sets in of the market cap being a nonsensical ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How things can change in a week. Tesla Motors (TSLA) CEO Elon Musk's response during a conference call (transcript) on a question over a capital increase was pretty definitive that the automaker had spent "no time" on the concept and a secondary offering would only be to ensure against an "unexpected supply interruption" or "risk event."&amp;nbsp; To be fair, an exec being coy is nothing new and shares of Tesla were only in 3rd gear at the time - but the response is still intriguing. (h/t SA contributor George Kesarios)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1032061?source=feed#comment-18938571</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18938571</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;Nothing to see here people, move along. &quot;<br/><br/>Not to convincing]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 09:08:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;Nothing to see here people, move along. &quot;<br/><br/>Not to convincing]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google And Several Other Tech Heavyweights Might Have Tax Problems</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1442231/comments?source=feed#comment-18938231</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18938231</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You are particularly observant George, first the Tesla find now this,  I'm a follower now. <br/><br/>There does indeed seem to be a lot of noise coming from different countries regarding the taxes that big companies like those you've mentioned in your article. You've raised a great point. This should definitely be an area for investors owning shares to keep an eye on. Tax havens have come under increasing scrutiny recently and it will be interesting to watch this develop.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 09:03:39 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You are particularly observant George, first the Tesla find now this,  I'm a follower now. <br/><br/>There does indeed seem to be a lot of noise coming from different countries regarding the taxes that big companies like those you've mentioned in your article. You've raised a great point. This should definitely be an area for investors owning shares to keep an eye on. Tax havens have come under increasing scrutiny recently and it will be interesting to watch this develop.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tesla's First Red Flag</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1443191/comments?source=feed#comment-18937331</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18937331</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[George Kesarios, <br/><br/>I enjoyed reading your article and opinion. I liked the &quot;Lesson learned 1 and 2&quot; style concluding statements. I believe you've made a good point about the Elon having raised additional funds though he said he does not see it in the near future - less a risk present itself and an action be necessary. Though it EXTREMELY plausible that Elon Musk did not cast a thought in the direction of a fund raising, the move was a good one for the company given the stock price. I'd be more ready to believe that he had it in his head that if the stock were to squeeze as much as it had then he would begin &quot;thinking&quot; - actually executing a fundraiser. I don't believe the thought never crossed his mind. <br/>Either way as time has shown the enormous support for this company and it's CEO is and will continue to be the driving force of the stock price, which is not a bad thing, just hard to read and understand - AND assign a number.<br/><br/>Thank You for your clear, short, well written article :)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 08:48:18 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[George Kesarios, <br/><br/>I enjoyed reading your article and opinion. I liked the &quot;Lesson learned 1 and 2&quot; style concluding statements. I believe you've made a good point about the Elon having raised additional funds though he said he does not see it in the near future - less a risk present itself and an action be necessary. Though it EXTREMELY plausible that Elon Musk did not cast a thought in the direction of a fund raising, the move was a good one for the company given the stock price. I'd be more ready to believe that he had it in his head that if the stock were to squeeze as much as it had then he would begin &quot;thinking&quot; - actually executing a fundraiser. I don't believe the thought never crossed his mind. <br/>Either way as time has shown the enormous support for this company and it's CEO is and will continue to be the driving force of the stock price, which is not a bad thing, just hard to read and understand - AND assign a number.<br/><br/>Thank You for your clear, short, well written article :)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tesla's First Red Flag</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1443191/comments?source=feed#comment-18936751</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18936751</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Be it sensible or not Elon Musk did mention, <br/><br/>&quot;So if we were to do a round, it would be for the reasons that you mentioned which is to ensure that if there was some unexpected supply interruption, some sort of risk event, but should potentially protect against a portion of your event that there could be some merit to doing a round&quot;<br/><br/>This should concern disciplined investors for it is possible that there is a need for these funds due to some unexpected supply interruption or risk event. If so, hopefully the new funds will allow management to solve them before the next earnings call for the sake of everyone who jumped in at 92 bucks a share.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 08:36:29 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Be it sensible or not Elon Musk did mention, <br/><br/>&quot;So if we were to do a round, it would be for the reasons that you mentioned which is to ensure that if there was some unexpected supply interruption, some sort of risk event, but should potentially protect against a portion of your event that there could be some merit to doing a round&quot;<br/><br/>This should concern disciplined investors for it is possible that there is a need for these funds due to some unexpected supply interruption or risk event. If so, hopefully the new funds will allow management to solve them before the next earnings call for the sake of everyone who jumped in at 92 bucks a share.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tesla's First Red Flag</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1443191/comments?source=feed#comment-18936371</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18936371</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Everyone is entitled to their own opinions Paul J. Schupf,<br/><br/>Actually author George Kesarios has very kindly shared with us his opinion about a TRUTHFUL event that occurred. Elon said a week before that he was not considering raising funds then in a very short period of time, decided to raise funds. This is not rubbish but a good point. I hope this company makes it past this tumultuous and very speculative period to become a shining example of what a great American company may achieve. Until then time will tell. <br/><br/>FYI<br/>I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 08:28:13 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Everyone is entitled to their own opinions Paul J. Schupf,<br/><br/>Actually author George Kesarios has very kindly shared with us his opinion about a TRUTHFUL event that occurred. Elon said a week before that he was not considering raising funds then in a very short period of time, decided to raise funds. This is not rubbish but a good point. I hope this company makes it past this tumultuous and very speculative period to become a shining example of what a great American company may achieve. Until then time will tell. <br/><br/>FYI<br/>I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tesla Motors (TSLA -0.4%) trades level with a tease from Elon Musk that an announcement is coming this week (Supercharger network next week) adding just a whiff of concern a secondary offering could be teed up. Also affecting sentiment, Deutsche Bank reiterates its Hold rating and raises its price target to $50, but considering the Tesla rally was missed by the investment firm and the new PT implies a 40% drop in share price, that may be one research note for File 13.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1026801?source=feed#comment-18849891</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18849891</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[TSLA had its squeeze, and like most of its kind, it will probably fall back to earth just as quick.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 10:56:16 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[TSLA had its squeeze, and like most of its kind, it will probably fall back to earth just as quick.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Foam On Tesla's Wave</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1417611/comments?source=feed#comment-18612971</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18612971</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Nicely written Randy. I particularly liked the beach imagery. <br/><br/>I am long Tesla, for now, and as no surprise I don't think it's particularly fair to warrant the ZEV credits as &quot;sea foam&quot;. Now I do understand that it's very easy to say my claim is one of a Tesla fan boy but hold on, hear me out. The ZEV credits are fact. Yes Tesla does not manufacture &quot;ZEV&quot; credits but they are indeed a sort of byproduct that comes with building and selling the electric car and as such they warrant respect as income generating. <br/><br/>I do agree with your sea foam approach and love the illustrative table but the ZEV credits which make a 71% of the foam are real profits. The ecosystem in which Tesla operates has allowed it to be profitable through selling of these credits that come with selling of the car. So, yes this exact scenario cannot be expected to reoccur. The guidance towards 25% gross margin was reaffirmed in the shareholder letter and it should be interesting to see how sales play out next quarter.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 04:52:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Nicely written Randy. I particularly liked the beach imagery. <br/><br/>I am long Tesla, for now, and as no surprise I don't think it's particularly fair to warrant the ZEV credits as &quot;sea foam&quot;. Now I do understand that it's very easy to say my claim is one of a Tesla fan boy but hold on, hear me out. The ZEV credits are fact. Yes Tesla does not manufacture &quot;ZEV&quot; credits but they are indeed a sort of byproduct that comes with building and selling the electric car and as such they warrant respect as income generating. <br/><br/>I do agree with your sea foam approach and love the illustrative table but the ZEV credits which make a 71% of the foam are real profits. The ecosystem in which Tesla operates has allowed it to be profitable through selling of these credits that come with selling of the car. So, yes this exact scenario cannot be expected to reoccur. The guidance towards 25% gross margin was reaffirmed in the shareholder letter and it should be interesting to see how sales play out next quarter.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tesla Motors' CEO Discusses Q1 2013 Results - Earnings Call Transcript</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1416891/comments?source=feed#comment-18612451</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18612451</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Yes the reservation reporting is defintely a pertinent issue here. Further explanation as to why he no longer will report any kind of reservation info would be nice. Another thing I would have liked to hear more about is the lease effect on profits and the mention of how TESLA benefits from the partnership with the banks in terms of the interest generated. It seems that TSLA makes more in the long term per vehicle sold if the cars are leased due to the added benefit of the accrued interest. I'd love to hear more on that. Also the risk defaults could play on profits. Finally I think it's very interesting to hear about the small little trials Tesla has had to grapple with in terms of manufacturing quality or any kind of small hiccup like the small lead acid battery storage Elon's mentions and the handle sensors malfunctioning. This shows a great deal of strength and care on Tesla's part to come to the rescue instead of say a &quot;recall&quot; and subsequent issue of a Technical Service Bulletin like the other car manufacters. He really gets on the problem and solves it. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 03:51:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Yes the reservation reporting is defintely a pertinent issue here. Further explanation as to why he no longer will report any kind of reservation info would be nice. Another thing I would have liked to hear more about is the lease effect on profits and the mention of how TESLA benefits from the partnership with the banks in terms of the interest generated. It seems that TSLA makes more in the long term per vehicle sold if the cars are leased due to the added benefit of the accrued interest. I'd love to hear more on that. Also the risk defaults could play on profits. Finally I think it's very interesting to hear about the small little trials Tesla has had to grapple with in terms of manufacturing quality or any kind of small hiccup like the small lead acid battery storage Elon's mentions and the handle sensors malfunctioning. This shows a great deal of strength and care on Tesla's part to come to the rescue instead of say a &quot;recall&quot; and subsequent issue of a Technical Service Bulletin like the other car manufacters. He really gets on the problem and solves it. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Hedged Are Short Sellers Against A Potential Epic Squeeze In Tesla Motors?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1360391/comments?source=feed#comment-17989651</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17989651</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[An update as to the short interest for the first half of April should be available after 4PM on the 24th of April<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/Rq00Sr'>http://bit.ly/Rq00Sr</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:16:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[An update as to the short interest for the first half of April should be available after 4PM on the 24th of April<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/Rq00Sr'>http://bit.ly/Rq00Sr</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Hedged Are Short Sellers Against A Potential Epic Squeeze In Tesla Motors?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1360391/comments?source=feed#comment-17985191</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17985191</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Very good question Hjalmarsen. I'm not aware of any.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 12:52:57 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Very good question Hjalmarsen. I'm not aware of any.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Hedged Are Short Sellers Against A Potential Epic Squeeze In Tesla Motors?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1360391/comments?source=feed#comment-17985031</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17985031</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Exactly what I was meaning to say in my comment above haha. Thank you Stookdog for calling it what it is !]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 12:49:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Exactly what I was meaning to say in my comment above haha. Thank you Stookdog for calling it what it is !]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Hedged Are Short Sellers Against A Potential Epic Squeeze In Tesla Motors?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1360391/comments?source=feed#comment-17967931</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17967931</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you SouthWest Michigan Trader for adding new information about short positions and their vulnerability based on call options. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 06:12:41 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you SouthWest Michigan Trader for adding new information about short positions and their vulnerability based on call options. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tesla Model S Is Ready For Prime Time</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1346751/comments?source=feed#comment-17730821</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17730821</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[This article is nicely written and I enjoyed the read FLG. Much of what you have written here is based on fowrad looking statements without much regard to &quot;not so forward looking statements&quot;. I guess that makes sense though because your user name is after all,<br/>&quot;Forward Looking Guru&quot;]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 09:27:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[This article is nicely written and I enjoyed the read FLG. Much of what you have written here is based on fowrad looking statements without much regard to &quot;not so forward looking statements&quot;. I guess that makes sense though because your user name is after all,<br/>&quot;Forward Looking Guru&quot;]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Morgan Stanley thinks the decision by Tesla Motors (TSLA) to drop the short-range version of the Model S is the right move for the automaker. Though it's a minor blow to the concept of mass market EV adoption, consolidating production around demand makes sense. Only 4% of Model S customers selected the 40kWh battery option. What to watch: Tesla is due to make a dramatic announcement later today with opinion divided if a capital raise is in store, a major expansion of its charging network, or an Elon Musk wildcard. TSLA +1.1% premarket to $44.40, but stay tuned.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/919941?source=feed#comment-17111781</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17111781</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Yesterday was truly an exciting day with the massive rally TSLA experienced. I can only hope the rally continues after Elon's announcement today. Something tells me there's reason as to why the decision was made to have this announcement occur AFTER the announcement made yesterday about meeting... I'm sorry... BEATING their OWN production projections...  <br/><br/>Something's up... We'll find out soon enough what.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 10:50:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Yesterday was truly an exciting day with the massive rally TSLA experienced. I can only hope the rally continues after Elon's announcement today. Something tells me there's reason as to why the decision was made to have this announcement occur AFTER the announcement made yesterday about meeting... I'm sorry... BEATING their OWN production projections...  <br/><br/>Something's up... We'll find out soon enough what.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AMD Builds A Sexier Image</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1296541/comments?source=feed#comment-16702891</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16702891</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Great find Ashraf! The updated logos are a good refresh I agree but is it enough ?  Its almost if it was a &quot;no brainer&quot; move by AMD, something that had to be done regardless and is already very late.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 13:38:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Great find Ashraf! The updated logos are a good refresh I agree but is it enough ?  Its almost if it was a &quot;no brainer&quot; move by AMD, something that had to be done regardless and is already very late.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tesla Predicts A Profit, But Analysts Disagree</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1254281/comments?source=feed#comment-15964231</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15964231</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Succinct, concise and to the point. Great morning read for me Stone Fox Capital enjoyed it and believe you make a strong point in your analysis of the EPS trend and the over promising and constant misses. It will be interesting to see if the company continues to get the support it needs until it eventually makes a profit. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 04:38:18 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Succinct, concise and to the point. Great morning read for me Stone Fox Capital enjoyed it and believe you make a strong point in your analysis of the EPS trend and the over promising and constant misses. It will be interesting to see if the company continues to get the support it needs until it eventually makes a profit. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why I'm Buying Dell At $14</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1221841/comments?source=feed#comment-15530451</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15530451</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I believe it will be closer to $16 but that is not reason enough to ignore the possibility of the deal falling through. Every outcome must be considered before making an investment. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:34:56 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I believe it will be closer to $16 but that is not reason enough to ignore the possibility of the deal falling through. Every outcome must be considered before making an investment. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why I'm Buying Dell At $14</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1221841/comments?source=feed#comment-15492991</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15492991</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[As Adam Aloisi has said, &quot; ..if the deal does not get done, your comment regarding downside risk is off&quot; is a very significant point towards the downside risk potential for a position at even the current LBO price. <br/><br/>Remember Microsoft's bid for Yahoo?  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:00:30 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[As Adam Aloisi has said, &quot; ..if the deal does not get done, your comment regarding downside risk is off&quot; is a very significant point towards the downside risk potential for a position at even the current LBO price. <br/><br/>Remember Microsoft's bid for Yahoo?  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>It Will Be Bullish If Tesla Meets Its Goals</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1216601/comments?source=feed#comment-15367041</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15367041</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Enjoyed your article, &quot;Cautiously Optimistic&quot; is definitely called for when evaluating TSLA as an investment. This is a very risky stock given it's market cap and continuously growing debt. It's amazing there have not been any major faults in production or any other hiccups along the way. A faulty product once many of these cars hit the road would wreck havoc on the stock price. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 10:31:24 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Enjoyed your article, &quot;Cautiously Optimistic&quot; is definitely called for when evaluating TSLA as an investment. This is a very risky stock given it's market cap and continuously growing debt. It's amazing there have not been any major faults in production or any other hiccups along the way. A faulty product once many of these cars hit the road would wreck havoc on the stock price. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More on Tesla: A Q1 profit is now expected; company had previously guided for a late 2013 profit, and the Q1 EPS consensus is -$0.13. Over 2,750 Model S units were produced in Q4 vs.~350 in Q3. 2,400 units were delivered, up from 253 in Q3; 20K deliveries expected in 2013. Net reservations at end of Q4 totaled 15K, up 2K from end of Q3. Company plans to open 15-20 new stores/galleries and double service locations in 2013. Gross margin was 8% vs. -17% in Q3, expected to hit 25% in 2H. Opex +29% Y/Y to $114.7M. TSLA -5.7% AH. CC at 5:30PM ET (webcast). (PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/839971?source=feed#comment-15278041</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15278041</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Seems as though maybe the shareholder letter might have some news that is not exactly celebratory, $TSLA down more than 7% at time of writing <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/WaZPO7'>http://bit.ly/WaZPO7</a><br/><br/>&quot;Converting these reservations to firm, non-refundable orders increased cancellations, as expected. After deliveries and<br/>cancellations, our net reservations at year end, were over<br/>15,000, up from about 13,000 at the end of Q3. New<br/>reservations continue at a steady, although slower pace in<br/>Q1 2013, as compared to December, due in part to the pull<br/>ahead of reservations into Q4 by customers seeking to<br/>avoid the price increase. Q1 cancellations are likely to<br/>remain elevated as the remaining older reservation holders<br/>are invited to configure their vehicles within a set time frame<br/>or pay the higher price just like new reservation holders.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:17:12 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Seems as though maybe the shareholder letter might have some news that is not exactly celebratory, $TSLA down more than 7% at time of writing <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/WaZPO7'>http://bit.ly/WaZPO7</a><br/><br/>&quot;Converting these reservations to firm, non-refundable orders increased cancellations, as expected. After deliveries and<br/>cancellations, our net reservations at year end, were over<br/>15,000, up from about 13,000 at the end of Q3. New<br/>reservations continue at a steady, although slower pace in<br/>Q1 2013, as compared to December, due in part to the pull<br/>ahead of reservations into Q4 by customers seeking to<br/>avoid the price increase. Q1 cancellations are likely to<br/>remain elevated as the remaining older reservation holders<br/>are invited to configure their vehicles within a set time frame<br/>or pay the higher price just like new reservation holders.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tesla Motors (TSLA): Q4 EPS of -$0.65 misses by $0.13. Revenue of $306.3M beats by $7.4M. Shares  -2.8% AH. (PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/839841?source=feed#comment-15276261</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15276261</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Very good question JackB125. I'm wondering the same thing, looks like a typical straddle then sell off on earnings, down 6% after hours right now. <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/155NgcH'>http://bit.ly/155NgcH</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:54:04 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Very good question JackB125. I'm wondering the same thing, looks like a typical straddle then sell off on earnings, down 6% after hours right now. <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/155NgcH'>http://bit.ly/155NgcH</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CNBC automobile industry reporter Phil LeBeau acknowledges unanswered questions on the ability of the Tesla Motors (TSLA -1.4%) Model S to ever be a mass market vehicles exist, but comes back from a test drive thoroughly impressed by the car and sees the possibility of it being a game changer.  LeBeau on the Model S: "I am convinced that this car is proof a solely electric car can and ultimately will gain acceptance by American drivers."</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/839021?source=feed#comment-15264051</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15264051</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Tesla has proven it can make a very solid vehicle. The focus of Tesla now should be getting more people into Tesla made vehicles. A less expensive model would really propel this company forward. Today's earnings should hopefully provide more insight. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:17:05 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Tesla has proven it can make a very solid vehicle. The focus of Tesla now should be getting more people into Tesla made vehicles. A less expensive model would really propel this company forward. Today's earnings should hopefully provide more insight. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>An editor with The New York Times backs up Elon Musk's claims that a reporter's test drive of a Tesla Motors (TSLA) was flawed, saying "casual and imprecise notes" were taken during the trip. Though falling short of saying the reporter sabotaged the drive intentionally, it's a major win for Musk and the company in the high-profile PR battle .</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/834101?source=feed#comment-15243031</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15243031</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Mr. Petersen the passage you have selected makes more sense when it is viewed in it's greater context,<br/><br/>&quot;In addition, Mr. Broder left himself open to valid criticism by taking what seem to be casual and imprecise notes along the journey, unaware that his every move was being monitored. A little red notebook in the front seat is no match for digitally recorded driving logs, which Mr. Musk has used, in the most damaging (and sometimes quite misleading) ways possible, as he defended his vehicle’s reputation.&quot;<br/><br/>The sentence you have chosen does not back Mr. Musk's claims. Nor does the paragraph give any strong feeling of Margaret Sullivan &quot;siding&quot; with Elon Musk, but when you read the title of the article, <br/><br/>&quot;Problems With Precision and Judgment, but Not Integrity, in Tesla Test&quot;<br/><br/>and read the various other paragraphs brought to light by the comment above by Oz_Rob, I think the overall gist of the article clearly shows Margaret believes that John M. Broder could have exercised better judgement - in general. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 06:13:07 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Mr. Petersen the passage you have selected makes more sense when it is viewed in it's greater context,<br/><br/>&quot;In addition, Mr. Broder left himself open to valid criticism by taking what seem to be casual and imprecise notes along the journey, unaware that his every move was being monitored. A little red notebook in the front seat is no match for digitally recorded driving logs, which Mr. Musk has used, in the most damaging (and sometimes quite misleading) ways possible, as he defended his vehicle’s reputation.&quot;<br/><br/>The sentence you have chosen does not back Mr. Musk's claims. Nor does the paragraph give any strong feeling of Margaret Sullivan &quot;siding&quot; with Elon Musk, but when you read the title of the article, <br/><br/>&quot;Problems With Precision and Judgment, but Not Integrity, in Tesla Test&quot;<br/><br/>and read the various other paragraphs brought to light by the comment above by Oz_Rob, I think the overall gist of the article clearly shows Margaret believes that John M. Broder could have exercised better judgement - in general. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tesla's Obscenely Expensive Cure For Range Anxiety</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1187511/comments?source=feed#comment-15043491</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15043491</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[So by assuming the cost of the energy storing component of the Tesla Model S and then depreciating that (Still not made clear how you decided to depreciate it) and then tacking on the cost of the energy to be stored in the batteries we arrive at the equivalent cost for an individual to run the vehicle relative to a gasoline fueled car?<br/>I do not understand why you are including the battery pack in the cost of &quot;fueling&quot; the Tesla. When you buy a gasoline car are you calculating what Ford, GM, Chrysler charge you relative to the number of gallons the vehicle can carry? When comparing the two are you depreciating the cost of the fuel tank over 8 years as to be comparable to the Tesla Model S?  <br/><br/>Forgive me if I seem confused or am missing the strong points of your comparison due to my lack of background comparable to your own Mr. Petersen. I am not on a side here, and notice that within the comments sections of your Tesla articles you recieve a lot of &quot;heat&quot;.  I seek to understand the numbers, and reasoning behind comparison. Is a comparison even possible?  Do you not feel even though the Model S is a sedan built to transport people and their junk from point A to point B that maybe the company has actually revolutionized a few of the key concepts and that comparing this vehicle to gasoline vehicles is a bit of a stretch. Kind of like comparing the filament bulb to the gas charged incandescent lighting of today. They have different uses though their function is somewhat the same. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:58:56 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[So by assuming the cost of the energy storing component of the Tesla Model S and then depreciating that (Still not made clear how you decided to depreciate it) and then tacking on the cost of the energy to be stored in the batteries we arrive at the equivalent cost for an individual to run the vehicle relative to a gasoline fueled car?<br/>I do not understand why you are including the battery pack in the cost of &quot;fueling&quot; the Tesla. When you buy a gasoline car are you calculating what Ford, GM, Chrysler charge you relative to the number of gallons the vehicle can carry? When comparing the two are you depreciating the cost of the fuel tank over 8 years as to be comparable to the Tesla Model S?  <br/><br/>Forgive me if I seem confused or am missing the strong points of your comparison due to my lack of background comparable to your own Mr. Petersen. I am not on a side here, and notice that within the comments sections of your Tesla articles you recieve a lot of &quot;heat&quot;.  I seek to understand the numbers, and reasoning behind comparison. Is a comparison even possible?  Do you not feel even though the Model S is a sedan built to transport people and their junk from point A to point B that maybe the company has actually revolutionized a few of the key concepts and that comparing this vehicle to gasoline vehicles is a bit of a stretch. Kind of like comparing the filament bulb to the gas charged incandescent lighting of today. They have different uses though their function is somewhat the same. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tesla's Obscenely Expensive Cure For Range Anxiety</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1187511/comments?source=feed#comment-15040611</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15040611</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;CNNMoney drove a Tesla Model S from Washington, D.C. to Boston, recharging it twice at the Supercharger stations in Delaware and Connecticut.&quot;<br/><br/>link:<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://cnnmon.ie/12RiFRH'>http://cnnmon.ie/12RiFRH</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:15:41 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;CNNMoney drove a Tesla Model S from Washington, D.C. to Boston, recharging it twice at the Supercharger stations in Delaware and Connecticut.&quot;<br/><br/>link:<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://cnnmon.ie/12RiFRH'>http://cnnmon.ie/12RiFRH</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tesla's Obscenely Expensive Cure For Range Anxiety</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1187511/comments?source=feed#comment-15040281</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15040281</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[and in some places I hear you can recharge for free.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:12:15 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[and in some places I hear you can recharge for free.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tesla's Obscenely Expensive Cure For Range Anxiety</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1187511/comments?source=feed#comment-15039101</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15039101</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Dear Mr. John Petersen,<br/><br/>How/What method did you employ when depreciating the cost of the 40Kwh battery? How did you determine the cost for the battery itself?<br/><br/>The $0.10 cost for recharging the battery of a model S is an average? How did you factor in the free charges that an owner may incur. Is the 10 cents an average &quot;cost to the consumer of electricity required for the vehicle to run&quot;? ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:54:09 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Dear Mr. John Petersen,<br/><br/>How/What method did you employ when depreciating the cost of the 40Kwh battery? How did you determine the cost for the battery itself?<br/><br/>The $0.10 cost for recharging the battery of a model S is an average? How did you factor in the free charges that an owner may incur. Is the 10 cents an average &quot;cost to the consumer of electricity required for the vehicle to run&quot;? ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dell (DELL +0.8%) rises to $13.90 after sources tell dealReporter Michael Dell and Silver Laker might increase their LBO offer in response to growing shareholder opposition to the current $13.65/share deal. Count Topeka's Brian White among those who see a higher bid eventually arriving.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/824591?source=feed#comment-14936471</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14936471</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Doubt Micheal Dell will let this one fall through, the offer of $13.65 was too cheap, he knew it and low balled it so he could settle for Buying out at $15 vs offering $15 and receiving the same backlash as he is experiencing now. The art of a good bargain.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 11:55:29 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Doubt Micheal Dell will let this one fall through, the offer of $13.65 was too cheap, he knew it and low balled it so he could settle for Buying out at $15 vs offering $15 and receiving the same backlash as he is experiencing now. The art of a good bargain.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Microsoft And The Infinite Monkey Theorem Of R&amp;D Spending</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1161061/comments?source=feed#comment-14664951</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14664951</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Excellent Article Bill, really enjoyed reading your take on the R&amp;D spending and results of MSFT.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 16:52:05 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Excellent Article Bill, really enjoyed reading your take on the R&amp;D spending and results of MSFT.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
