Jerrold Williams's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com http://seekingalpha.comuser/247454/comments http://seekingalpha.com/article/181320/comments?source=feed#comment-837462 837462
It's funny how some people that love SIRIUS XM want to believe that there is no competition for satellite radio. Do people forget that the reason SIRIUS XM exists as a combined company is because they had to prove there is competition from mp3 players, terrestrial radio, and yes internet radio! Now it is my opinion that SIRIUS XM is far superior than all other options. I feel the content is better and the service is more reliable than the internet can ever be. Sure, you may go into your garage or in a tunnel and lose signal. However, most people spend most of their drive time with a clear view of the sky. So, to say internet radio is No threat to satellite radio is too strong. It is competition....But so is terrestrial radio, cds, mp3s....EVEN TOTAL SILENCE IN YOUR CAR! The bottom line is CONTENT IS KING....weather you get it through satellite or the internet. Internet radio is nothing more than a Jukebox that anyone with a 8gb mp3 player can duplicate. Some will choose Internet radio over SIRIUS XM...Some people still have 8 disk cd changers in their cars, to each his own.These people that choose internet radio over SIRIUS XM won't like comedy, news, sports, or anything but a music jukebox. SIRIUS XM or any service will never be the perfect fit for everyone. That is why there are always alternatives. Internet radio is already here and has been available for years. Anyone with a cell phone and data plan can use. Some do...however, over 18 million and growing use SIRIUS XM instead.

Jerrold Williams
Thanks for your support]]> Thu, 07 Jan 2010 08:27:36 -0500
It's funny how some people that love SIRIUS XM want to believe that there is no competition for satellite radio. Do people forget that the reason SIRIUS XM exists as a combined company is because they had to prove there is competition from mp3 players, terrestrial radio, and yes internet radio! Now it is my opinion that SIRIUS XM is far superior than all other options. I feel the content is better and the service is more reliable than the internet can ever be. Sure, you may go into your garage or in a tunnel and lose signal. However, most people spend most of their drive time with a clear view of the sky. So, to say internet radio is No threat to satellite radio is too strong. It is competition....But so is terrestrial radio, cds, mp3s....EVEN TOTAL SILENCE IN YOUR CAR! The bottom line is CONTENT IS KING....weather you get it through satellite or the internet. Internet radio is nothing more than a Jukebox that anyone with a 8gb mp3 player can duplicate. Some will choose Internet radio over SIRIUS XM...Some people still have 8 disk cd changers in their cars, to each his own.These people that choose internet radio over SIRIUS XM won't like comedy, news, sports, or anything but a music jukebox. SIRIUS XM or any service will never be the perfect fit for everyone. That is why there are always alternatives. Internet radio is already here and has been available for years. Anyone with a cell phone and data plan can use. Some do...however, over 18 million and growing use SIRIUS XM instead.

Jerrold Williams
Thanks for your support]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/181065/comments?source=feed#comment-836684 836684 Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:48:20 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/181065/comments?source=feed#comment-836480 836480
Jerrold Williams
Thanks for your support. ]]> Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:45:57 -0500
Jerrold Williams
Thanks for your support. ]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/181065/comments?source=feed#comment-836419 836419 To qualify for the "trending up crew" you have to believe and post the following.

1. When SIRI loses over 20%, you must state using fancy language that it is "trending up"
2. When shown facts...You must then say you have some magical chart with some kind of "bands" that still says it is "trending up" when in fact people may be losing tens/hundreds of thousands of dollars.
3. You of course must support what RAF says, as he is the leader of this club.

In my opinion, about 95% of bloggers here are in with the con game to hype the stock with no realistic viewpoints.

Jerrold Williams
Thanks for your support
I apologize for the scarcity of my posts lately. ]]> Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:12:17 -0500 To qualify for the "trending up crew" you have to believe and post the following.

1. When SIRI loses over 20%, you must state using fancy language that it is "trending up"
2. When shown facts...You must then say you have some magical chart with some kind of "bands" that still says it is "trending up" when in fact people may be losing tens/hundreds of thousands of dollars.
3. You of course must support what RAF says, as he is the leader of this club.

In my opinion, about 95% of bloggers here are in with the con game to hype the stock with no realistic viewpoints.

Jerrold Williams
Thanks for your support
I apologize for the scarcity of my posts lately. ]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/181065/comments?source=feed#comment-836402 836402 At what point do people give up the dream of SIRI hitting $1.00 by March? Ok, unless they announce some miracle device this week at CES, what could possibly make this stock move big time? It moved well the last few days. However, the current levels have been seen in the last few months...only to dip back down to the mid to high $.50s. Maybe management knows something that they have managed to keep hidden from subscribers and investors. They seem to just be screwing the retail investor because they think they are just a bunch of idiots. They want to keep institutional investors out so they can screw the millions of "lower class" investors in SIRI. I just have a very bad feeling about what they are doing to current investors. Another "carrot" was just thrown for the new year for a bunch of new folks who will lose about 20% of their investment in the next 10 days. I see the same pattern. SIRI share price rises..propaganda about bullish catapult to $1.00...Then the crooks sell their share and new investors lose about 20%. I'm sick of that con game.
I look to make money on this mid 2010 or 2011after the R/S...Current shareholders are playing Russian roulette.

Jerrold Williams
Thanks for your support

PS...I personally visited Mr. Stupids coffee shop....You won't be hearing from him again. he was "taken care of".]]> Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:02:11 -0500 At what point do people give up the dream of SIRI hitting $1.00 by March? Ok, unless they announce some miracle device this week at CES, what could possibly make this stock move big time? It moved well the last few days. However, the current levels have been seen in the last few months...only to dip back down to the mid to high $.50s. Maybe management knows something that they have managed to keep hidden from subscribers and investors. They seem to just be screwing the retail investor because they think they are just a bunch of idiots. They want to keep institutional investors out so they can screw the millions of "lower class" investors in SIRI. I just have a very bad feeling about what they are doing to current investors. Another "carrot" was just thrown for the new year for a bunch of new folks who will lose about 20% of their investment in the next 10 days. I see the same pattern. SIRI share price rises..propaganda about bullish catapult to $1.00...Then the crooks sell their share and new investors lose about 20%. I'm sick of that con game.
I look to make money on this mid 2010 or 2011after the R/S...Current shareholders are playing Russian roulette.

Jerrold Williams
Thanks for your support

PS...I personally visited Mr. Stupids coffee shop....You won't be hearing from him again. he was "taken care of".]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/180735/comments?source=feed#comment-834451 834451 Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:23:30 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/180735/comments?source=feed#comment-834139 834139 Tue, 05 Jan 2010 13:09:50 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/180735/comments?source=feed#comment-834088 834088 What country are you from? If you are in the U.S and don't know anyone with satellite radio...you need more friends. There are over 18,000,000 subs. I cant even walk in a decent size parking lot and not notice at least a couple of satelite radio antennas on cars. People always will pay for premium products or services. If not, would people need to buy coke or pepsi? Water is cheaper...after all, they are both just something to drink....lol...water is actually healthier!]]> Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:36:19 -0500 What country are you from? If you are in the U.S and don't know anyone with satellite radio...you need more friends. There are over 18,000,000 subs. I cant even walk in a decent size parking lot and not notice at least a couple of satelite radio antennas on cars. People always will pay for premium products or services. If not, would people need to buy coke or pepsi? Water is cheaper...after all, they are both just something to drink....lol...water is actually healthier!]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/180735/comments?source=feed#comment-832351 832351 No question SIRI investors have been "rewarded" since the company almost filed for bankruptcy. I have said many times, I love the service and the future of the company. However, due to all the uncertainty at this point, the stock will remain stagnant. In fact it has lost a substantial amount since August 2009. All this technical strength talk is really foolish at this point. Explain the technical strength in going from $.78 in August 2009 down to just $.57 in the last few weeks. That is about a 28% downward move. I know your game, you will come back and say losing $.21 is not a big deal, it's only pennies. You will mention bands and a lot of useless jargon to impress those new to the site. Then use more fancy language to make people think losing 28% is no big deal. 28% is a big deal to me, especially when the overall market is doing well. Look at recent history, the last 3 months....As the March deadline gets closer....The more uncertainty...thus share holders will lose until this is addressed.

Sure uncertainty is a part of life. however some uncertainties are easily addressed. It is unjust to leave shareholders with so many questions left unanswered. When there is an issue, it is best to deal with it, rather than hoping or pushing it under the rug. That is what Mel Karmazin is doing at this point.]]> Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:33:07 -0500 No question SIRI investors have been "rewarded" since the company almost filed for bankruptcy. I have said many times, I love the service and the future of the company. However, due to all the uncertainty at this point, the stock will remain stagnant. In fact it has lost a substantial amount since August 2009. All this technical strength talk is really foolish at this point. Explain the technical strength in going from $.78 in August 2009 down to just $.57 in the last few weeks. That is about a 28% downward move. I know your game, you will come back and say losing $.21 is not a big deal, it's only pennies. You will mention bands and a lot of useless jargon to impress those new to the site. Then use more fancy language to make people think losing 28% is no big deal. 28% is a big deal to me, especially when the overall market is doing well. Look at recent history, the last 3 months....As the March deadline gets closer....The more uncertainty...thus share holders will lose until this is addressed.

Sure uncertainty is a part of life. however some uncertainties are easily addressed. It is unjust to leave shareholders with so many questions left unanswered. When there is an issue, it is best to deal with it, rather than hoping or pushing it under the rug. That is what Mel Karmazin is doing at this point.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/180735/comments?source=feed#comment-832175 832175 Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:27:25 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/180735/comments?source=feed#comment-832025 832025 Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:31:56 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/179291/comments?source=feed#comment-829990 829990 I have stated in the past that I don't post to get a "thumbs up". You have to realize that many people are SIRI long investors here and give thumbs up only to positive statements about the stock. Thus if I am a cheerleader for SIRI news, and only state the positive even if it is not true. I will have a high rating. I have made the pledge to my readers to tell them the truth even if it hurts them to read it. This stock has a large following of groupies that love to hear how they will get rich . Any realistic talk is seen as negative and gets thumbs down. So, if you have many thumbs up, it simply means you are a cheerleader. I speak the truth and don't even look at my ratings. Did you get a trophy for being top 100? Congratulations!
As far as SIRIUSMAN, I have no clue what you are referring to.


On Jan 02 06:57 PM R A F wrote:

> Jerrold/SIRIUSMAN/FRAUD - Liberty Staff may be relatively new
> to this site but he certainly knows a dud when he sees one.
> By the way - check out your ratings to see how you are viewed
> by your peers. When I just checked, you were riding close to the
> bottom with a rating of minus 97 after 369 posts.
>
> For someone who thinks your comments are as insightful as you state
> below, I would suggest you give these ratings some thought. This
> is an indication of how all others view your credibility -
> requires some introspection on your part and a realization that you
> have a lot of work to do to correct this in the new year.
>
> On Jan 02 06:34 PM Jerrold Williams wrote:]]> Sat, 02 Jan 2010 20:51:03 -0500 I have stated in the past that I don't post to get a "thumbs up". You have to realize that many people are SIRI long investors here and give thumbs up only to positive statements about the stock. Thus if I am a cheerleader for SIRI news, and only state the positive even if it is not true. I will have a high rating. I have made the pledge to my readers to tell them the truth even if it hurts them to read it. This stock has a large following of groupies that love to hear how they will get rich . Any realistic talk is seen as negative and gets thumbs down. So, if you have many thumbs up, it simply means you are a cheerleader. I speak the truth and don't even look at my ratings. Did you get a trophy for being top 100? Congratulations!
As far as SIRIUSMAN, I have no clue what you are referring to.


On Jan 02 06:57 PM R A F wrote:

> Jerrold/SIRIUSMAN/FRAUD - Liberty Staff may be relatively new
> to this site but he certainly knows a dud when he sees one.
> By the way - check out your ratings to see how you are viewed
> by your peers. When I just checked, you were riding close to the
> bottom with a rating of minus 97 after 369 posts.
>
> For someone who thinks your comments are as insightful as you state
> below, I would suggest you give these ratings some thought. This
> is an indication of how all others view your credibility -
> requires some introspection on your part and a realization that you
> have a lot of work to do to correct this in the new year.
>
> On Jan 02 06:34 PM Jerrold Williams wrote:]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/179291/comments?source=feed#comment-829930 829930
Jerrold Williams
Thanks for your support in 2010

On Jan 02 06:10 PM Liberty Staff wrote:

> How can something be continued that never was?
>
> The man
> ]]> Sat, 02 Jan 2010 18:34:51 -0500
Jerrold Williams
Thanks for your support in 2010

On Jan 02 06:10 PM Liberty Staff wrote:

> How can something be continued that never was?
>
> The man
> ]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/179291/comments?source=feed#comment-829838 829838
Jerrold Williams
Thanks for your continues support in 2010


On Jan 02 02:55 PM R A F wrote:


>
> By the way - I see your rating among your peers at Seeking Alpha
> is negative 1188 after 1640 comments. Does this reflect some
> sort of prevailing negative bias on your part?]]> Sat, 02 Jan 2010 17:03:22 -0500
Jerrold Williams
Thanks for your continues support in 2010


On Jan 02 02:55 PM R A F wrote:


>
> By the way - I see your rating among your peers at Seeking Alpha
> is negative 1188 after 1640 comments. Does this reflect some
> sort of prevailing negative bias on your part?]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/179291/comments?source=feed#comment-828348 828348 C'MON RAF....People in here are not that STUPID! YOUR GAME IS OVER!

Jerrold Williams
Thanks for your support


On Dec 31 02:06 PM R A F wrote:

> To clear up any misconceptions about the possibility of a stock buy
> back program sometime in the future, I would suggest readers go to
> Google and search under "Neil Cavuto Mel Karmazin 2009". "Mel Karmazin on Fox News (Neil Cavuto) Shabooty.com"]]> Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:57:47 -0500 C'MON RAF....People in here are not that STUPID! YOUR GAME IS OVER!

Jerrold Williams
Thanks for your support


On Dec 31 02:06 PM R A F wrote:

> To clear up any misconceptions about the possibility of a stock buy
> back program sometime in the future, I would suggest readers go to
> Google and search under "Neil Cavuto Mel Karmazin 2009". "Mel Karmazin on Fox News (Neil Cavuto) Shabooty.com"]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/179291/comments?source=feed#comment-826151 826151
"bond covenants prevent the company from buying back shares before the debt is repaid "

People are so afraid of the R/S that they are now pushing this buyback? This has never been an option! They have too much debt to even consider that opion!

I have to advise everyone besides gamblers, to sell at this point and wait for the R/S to buy back. Leave emotions and SIRI STOCK behind in 2009! Buy back in 2010 after the R/S....

Jerrold Williams
Thanks for your support in 2009]]> Wed, 30 Dec 2009 09:14:11 -0500
"bond covenants prevent the company from buying back shares before the debt is repaid "

People are so afraid of the R/S that they are now pushing this buyback? This has never been an option! They have too much debt to even consider that opion!

I have to advise everyone besides gamblers, to sell at this point and wait for the R/S to buy back. Leave emotions and SIRI STOCK behind in 2009! Buy back in 2010 after the R/S....

Jerrold Williams
Thanks for your support in 2009]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/179291/comments?source=feed#comment-819243 819243 Jerrold Williams has gone on vacation for the rest of the year. All further correspondence to Jerrold Williams and his staff will have to wait until January 2, 2010. Sorry for the inconvenience.

this is an auto response..

Jerrold Williams
Thanks for your support in 2009


On Dec 23 01:35 PM gayworker wrote:

> Jerry the fairy, tail between your legs. Get a life. No shares, no
> advicey, no talky bloggy.]]> Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:06:08 -0500 Jerrold Williams has gone on vacation for the rest of the year. All further correspondence to Jerrold Williams and his staff will have to wait until January 2, 2010. Sorry for the inconvenience.

this is an auto response..

Jerrold Williams
Thanks for your support in 2009


On Dec 23 01:35 PM gayworker wrote:

> Jerry the fairy, tail between your legs. Get a life. No shares, no
> advicey, no talky bloggy.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/179291/comments?source=feed#comment-819085 819085 1. Blackberry app, hopefully apps for all smart phones. Also, they need to retire the ridiculous blackberry plan that exists now...$7.99 for 20 channels. Only an idiot would sign up for that.

2. The re-signing of Howard Stern, also getting his mobile rights so he can be listened to on mobile phones...

a side note with Howard Stern. He may be the biggest personality on radio. However, I see an issue with his show. His show is one of those shows that has commercials on SIRIUS XM. He has an audience easily over 1 million per day. His freedom of speech is great for him and his fans....It is not good for advertisers though...it is tough to balance....letting him be free with speech or toning it down to get more "mainstream" advertisers...
Oh well...I guess they will have to settle for "cougar life" and pennystock advertisements....Howard Stern gets more subscribers to sign on, but a channel like Oprah Radio brings in a lot more advertising dollars...Would be great if numbers of listeners could ever be known....


3. Increasing of Brand recognition. Once that is done. People can get SIRIUS XM devices for the cheapest price in the history of satellite radio. Radios that can be self installed are available for as low as $49.99...low as $29.99 for existing customers..I think the lifetime package is great...If they could ever work out an installment plan for lifetime service...that would be good...they have a 4 month plan....I was thinking more like pay $399 over a 12 month period..example $34.00 a month for 12 months, many just can't get use to the idea of paying for radio on a permanent basis in my opinion...Pay for a year and be done with payments....

4. A dual marketing plan with Direct tv to offer a bundled package to the million of Direct tv subscribers. A similar plan should be worked with Dish network if possible.

And finally, a release of the term "paid blogger" from the bad word list of seeking alpha. That word did become one of my favorite terms of 2009! Ok, a little sarcasm at the end....best wishes to all....I think Jerrold Williams and staff will close shop for the rest of 2009...unless something weird happens or someone tries to degrade the name Jerrold Williams.

Best wishes
Jerrold Williams
Thanks for your support in 2009]]> Wed, 23 Dec 2009 13:06:37 -0500 1. Blackberry app, hopefully apps for all smart phones. Also, they need to retire the ridiculous blackberry plan that exists now...$7.99 for 20 channels. Only an idiot would sign up for that.

2. The re-signing of Howard Stern, also getting his mobile rights so he can be listened to on mobile phones...

a side note with Howard Stern. He may be the biggest personality on radio. However, I see an issue with his show. His show is one of those shows that has commercials on SIRIUS XM. He has an audience easily over 1 million per day. His freedom of speech is great for him and his fans....It is not good for advertisers though...it is tough to balance....letting him be free with speech or toning it down to get more "mainstream" advertisers...
Oh well...I guess they will have to settle for "cougar life" and pennystock advertisements....Howard Stern gets more subscribers to sign on, but a channel like Oprah Radio brings in a lot more advertising dollars...Would be great if numbers of listeners could ever be known....


3. Increasing of Brand recognition. Once that is done. People can get SIRIUS XM devices for the cheapest price in the history of satellite radio. Radios that can be self installed are available for as low as $49.99...low as $29.99 for existing customers..I think the lifetime package is great...If they could ever work out an installment plan for lifetime service...that would be good...they have a 4 month plan....I was thinking more like pay $399 over a 12 month period..example $34.00 a month for 12 months, many just can't get use to the idea of paying for radio on a permanent basis in my opinion...Pay for a year and be done with payments....

4. A dual marketing plan with Direct tv to offer a bundled package to the million of Direct tv subscribers. A similar plan should be worked with Dish network if possible.

And finally, a release of the term "paid blogger" from the bad word list of seeking alpha. That word did become one of my favorite terms of 2009! Ok, a little sarcasm at the end....best wishes to all....I think Jerrold Williams and staff will close shop for the rest of 2009...unless something weird happens or someone tries to degrade the name Jerrold Williams.

Best wishes
Jerrold Williams
Thanks for your support in 2009]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/179291/comments?source=feed#comment-818575 818575 You can review all of Jerrold Williams blogs to see I called this stocks fluctuations at about a 90% accuracy. You seem to have a lot of anger. I hope I helped you by being the outlet to let off your steam. Jerrold Williams wishes you the best with your "advanced" trading strategy that is way over my head. I have no need to have a conversation with someone with so much anger. Bad Karma. I wish you the best gayworker. I apologize for pointing out your "typo" that you repeatedly had on the same word. If I have any typos, pardon me as well.


Jerrold Williams
Thanks for your support


On Dec 22 11:08 PM gayworker wrote:

> Jerrold, you sold your shares at .63 and you are still here blogging.................]]> Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:21:36 -0500 You can review all of Jerrold Williams blogs to see I called this stocks fluctuations at about a 90% accuracy. You seem to have a lot of anger. I hope I helped you by being the outlet to let off your steam. Jerrold Williams wishes you the best with your "advanced" trading strategy that is way over my head. I have no need to have a conversation with someone with so much anger. Bad Karma. I wish you the best gayworker. I apologize for pointing out your "typo" that you repeatedly had on the same word. If I have any typos, pardon me as well.


Jerrold Williams
Thanks for your support


On Dec 22 11:08 PM gayworker wrote:

> Jerrold, you sold your shares at .63 and you are still here blogging.................]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/179291/comments?source=feed#comment-817880 817880 If you don't believe in a company's management and you feel the service isn't in demand.....DON'T BUY, DON'T BUY
If you feel the stock will tank....SELL! SELL! SELL!
Don't buy "many shares" of a company you don't believe in!
Maybe I am the idiot. I should read where Warren Buffet would buy many shares of a stock of a company he says has bad management, outdated technology and whose stock is headed down. Then as an intelligent investor, you predict it will keep going down but you still hold on to "many shares", that will help your diversified portfolio?. That is just dumb, idiotic, foolish, etc.......what do I know.I need training on how to pick stocks I feel have bad management and whose stock I feel will tank, I need to find the benefit of investing in that company's' stock and watch it lose value as you do.....I can understand those that hold and expect a turnaround, they can speculate...but you say it will keep going down because of failing management and competition, yet you still hold "many shares". So, my point is you try to give yourself credibility by saying you hold "many shares" and then try to bash the company. I had to set you straight. I had to point to the inconsistency of your B.S. That's all...By the way, Don't claim I am trying to start an "arguement"!. Don't try to use words you cant even spell!
"argument", I believe is the correct spelling...But I am the idiot...lol
Dayworker, once again you have been set straight by Jerrold Williams.

You are dismissed, You do not deserve further comments from Jerrold Williams!

Jerrold Williams
Thanks for your support

On Dec 22 05:19 PM dayworker wrote:

> Jerrold, as I've said before to you. You're about as dumb as they
> come. No use exchanging with you, you're on the lower side of dumb
> and dumber. You just want start arguements and not talk business.
>
> Probably because you really know little about investing and have
> a small undiversified porfolio. Selling is a timing issue that not
> only relates
> to the investment but a total portfolio plan that takes into account
> certain tax strategy issues and leveraging with in context to one's
> whole portfolio. You're just an investor idiot and nightmare. There's
> right time to sell and a right time to buy and good investor's know
>
> when to play their hand. Something you just don't get. You have no
> idea about how much I've already sold and at what price i'm buying.
> You just make up arguements because you have nothing better to do
> than strike out with negativity at people. Try writing some good
> business investment information. Idiot, idiot, idiot.]]> Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:09:11 -0500 If you don't believe in a company's management and you feel the service isn't in demand.....DON'T BUY, DON'T BUY
If you feel the stock will tank....SELL! SELL! SELL!
Don't buy "many shares" of a company you don't believe in!
Maybe I am the idiot. I should read where Warren Buffet would buy many shares of a stock of a company he says has bad management, outdated technology and whose stock is headed down. Then as an intelligent investor, you predict it will keep going down but you still hold on to "many shares", that will help your diversified portfolio?. That is just dumb, idiotic, foolish, etc.......what do I know.I need training on how to pick stocks I feel have bad management and whose stock I feel will tank, I need to find the benefit of investing in that company's' stock and watch it lose value as you do.....I can understand those that hold and expect a turnaround, they can speculate...but you say it will keep going down because of failing management and competition, yet you still hold "many shares". So, my point is you try to give yourself credibility by saying you hold "many shares" and then try to bash the company. I had to set you straight. I had to point to the inconsistency of your B.S. That's all...By the way, Don't claim I am trying to start an "arguement"!. Don't try to use words you cant even spell!
"argument", I believe is the correct spelling...But I am the idiot...lol
Dayworker, once again you have been set straight by Jerrold Williams.

You are dismissed, You do not deserve further comments from Jerrold Williams!

Jerrold Williams
Thanks for your support

On Dec 22 05:19 PM dayworker wrote:

> Jerrold, as I've said before to you. You're about as dumb as they
> come. No use exchanging with you, you're on the lower side of dumb
> and dumber. You just want start arguements and not talk business.
>
> Probably because you really know little about investing and have
> a small undiversified porfolio. Selling is a timing issue that not
> only relates
> to the investment but a total portfolio plan that takes into account
> certain tax strategy issues and leveraging with in context to one's
> whole portfolio. You're just an investor idiot and nightmare. There's
> right time to sell and a right time to buy and good investor's know
>
> when to play their hand. Something you just don't get. You have no
> idea about how much I've already sold and at what price i'm buying.
> You just make up arguements because you have nothing better to do
> than strike out with negativity at people. Try writing some good
> business investment information. Idiot, idiot, idiot.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/179291/comments?source=feed#comment-817647 817647 Let me give you some advice, if you think the stock won't break out and will only go lower....DON'T KEEP "A LOT OF SIRI STOCK!! SELL! WHY ARE YOU THROWING YOUR MONEY AWAY!
I SOLD AT $.63, you should have sold back in November if you felt it was going down back then! WTF!?

Jerrold Williams
Thanks for your support]]> Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:13:48 -0500 Let me give you some advice, if you think the stock won't break out and will only go lower....DON'T KEEP "A LOT OF SIRI STOCK!! SELL! WHY ARE YOU THROWING YOUR MONEY AWAY!
I SOLD AT $.63, you should have sold back in November if you felt it was going down back then! WTF!?

Jerrold Williams
Thanks for your support]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/179291/comments?source=feed#comment-817617 817617 Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:51:47 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/179291/comments?source=feed#comment-817581 817581

On Dec 22 03:27 PM Mr . Stupid wrote:]]> Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:33:38 -0500

On Dec 22 03:27 PM Mr . Stupid wrote:]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/179291/comments?source=feed#comment-817541 817541 PENNY STOCKS ARE CONSIDERED HIGH RISK "LOTTERY TICKET" INVESTMENTS! WHY DOES MEL KARMAZIN WANT TO KEEP SIRI A A PENNY STOCK! HE WANTS AN EXCEPTION TO ALLOW SIRI TO TRADE UNER A $1.00!? WHY!?
He knows by keeping this a penny stock he keeps out many institutional investors. My question is why does he want to fight to continue this? Think deeply about this....It will save you a lot of money!]]> Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:03:52 -0500 PENNY STOCKS ARE CONSIDERED HIGH RISK "LOTTERY TICKET" INVESTMENTS! WHY DOES MEL KARMAZIN WANT TO KEEP SIRI A A PENNY STOCK! HE WANTS AN EXCEPTION TO ALLOW SIRI TO TRADE UNER A $1.00!? WHY!?
He knows by keeping this a penny stock he keeps out many institutional investors. My question is why does he want to fight to continue this? Think deeply about this....It will save you a lot of money!]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/179291/comments?source=feed#comment-817521 817521
Jerrold Williams
Thanks for your support.]]> Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:48:34 -0500
Jerrold Williams
Thanks for your support.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/179291/comments?source=feed#comment-816958 816958
Thinking more out of the box on the Howard Stern issue. From a marketing standpoint. It will be wise to drag this out for the whole year. I know it hurts now, but the speculation will start to build as we get closer to December 2010. The mass media will be all over it...Will Howard Stern retire, will he return to regular radio, etc...His signing at that point can be a big a story as it was 5 years ago! This will once again be great publicity for SIRIUS XM if it works out that way. I would look for National headlines and coverage. If he re-signed "early" the story would lose a lot of it's impact. As far as how much he is paid, Mel K is great at working that out. Howard Stern is the leading source that gives satellite radio credibility in media. Losing H. Stern and not having him as an ally of satellite radio would be a disaster for SIRIUS XM. Mel K has said that Howard Stern is one of the few personalities that definitely paid for himself long ago! They could change the XM "best of SIRIUS" package to the Howard Stern package....He might have paid for himself just from those numbers...I don't know if they were ever released...


On Dec 22 08:58 AM orlik7 wrote:

> The truth is haward stern in number one pervert. It's not funny how
> he perverted the whole nation. Siri was trading at $2.5 before ha
> came. 500 million dollars a year for one guy? Are you kidding me?for
> what? Give him basic salary like everyone esle. He might be the reason
> siri became a penny stock. How they even come up with such number?500
> mil.
> Let him go , Mel.
> Use this money to buy back stock.]]> Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:23:06 -0500
Thinking more out of the box on the Howard Stern issue. From a marketing standpoint. It will be wise to drag this out for the whole year. I know it hurts now, but the speculation will start to build as we get closer to December 2010. The mass media will be all over it...Will Howard Stern retire, will he return to regular radio, etc...His signing at that point can be a big a story as it was 5 years ago! This will once again be great publicity for SIRIUS XM if it works out that way. I would look for National headlines and coverage. If he re-signed "early" the story would lose a lot of it's impact. As far as how much he is paid, Mel K is great at working that out. Howard Stern is the leading source that gives satellite radio credibility in media. Losing H. Stern and not having him as an ally of satellite radio would be a disaster for SIRIUS XM. Mel K has said that Howard Stern is one of the few personalities that definitely paid for himself long ago! They could change the XM "best of SIRIUS" package to the Howard Stern package....He might have paid for himself just from those numbers...I don't know if they were ever released...


On Dec 22 08:58 AM orlik7 wrote:

> The truth is haward stern in number one pervert. It's not funny how
> he perverted the whole nation. Siri was trading at $2.5 before ha
> came. 500 million dollars a year for one guy? Are you kidding me?for
> what? Give him basic salary like everyone esle. He might be the reason
> siri became a penny stock. How they even come up with such number?500
> mil.
> Let him go , Mel.
> Use this money to buy back stock.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/179291/comments?source=feed#comment-816936 816936 I also have to disagree with you big time. To say the content isn't good is just silly. XM has over 170 channels, none are good? that is insane. I don't know what XM music stations you listened to, but if you were bored, CHANGE THE STATION....I would be bored by the ELVIS station, or any other Rock n Roll station...so, I don't listen to them, I personally prefer SHADE45, and HIP HOP NATION...to each his own! There are over 170 channels. To say that many listen only 1 or 2 hours a day and the price isn't worth it is also ridiculous. If $.50 a day for 1 or 2 hours a day of entertainment is out of your budget, i understand. However, How many hours a day do you watch tv? how much is your cable or satellite bill? How much do you talk on the phone,,how much is your cell phone bill? ...So, bottom line. Some people will always prefer free service over pay...However, to say it is a sub par product when they have over 18 million subscribers is silly. Their churn rate is one of the lowest in the subscription service industry so most people that try it must love it. Your 4gig or even a 128 gig mp3 player lacks one important thing....the ability to get live and fresh content. it will just be a big jukebox of songs you put on there and heard already....That is good for sometimes...but for most that gets boring fast....Plus, who wants to take the time to update songs everyday...Let the pros do it..and spend your time more efficiently...
By the way...lol...If a 4gb mp3 player for $30.00 is adequate entertainment for you...You don't need SIRIUS XM.....You are just a cheap person with limited needs in entertainment. You and your wife enjoy your great 4gb MP3 player.....You probably still use a VCR instead of paying for DVR service....You can get a VCR for $5.00 and no monthly charge....Keep using your old limited technology.....

Jerrold Williams
Thanks for your support


On Dec 22 07:19 AM tdw wrote:

> You've forgotten one important element--the content has to be GOOD.
> My wife and I subscribed to XM for two years, but the DJ's had no
> imagination and kept playing the same songs over and over, no matter...................]]> Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:14:13 -0500 I also have to disagree with you big time. To say the content isn't good is just silly. XM has over 170 channels, none are good? that is insane. I don't know what XM music stations you listened to, but if you were bored, CHANGE THE STATION....I would be bored by the ELVIS station, or any other Rock n Roll station...so, I don't listen to them, I personally prefer SHADE45, and HIP HOP NATION...to each his own! There are over 170 channels. To say that many listen only 1 or 2 hours a day and the price isn't worth it is also ridiculous. If $.50 a day for 1 or 2 hours a day of entertainment is out of your budget, i understand. However, How many hours a day do you watch tv? how much is your cable or satellite bill? How much do you talk on the phone,,how much is your cell phone bill? ...So, bottom line. Some people will always prefer free service over pay...However, to say it is a sub par product when they have over 18 million subscribers is silly. Their churn rate is one of the lowest in the subscription service industry so most people that try it must love it. Your 4gig or even a 128 gig mp3 player lacks one important thing....the ability to get live and fresh content. it will just be a big jukebox of songs you put on there and heard already....That is good for sometimes...but for most that gets boring fast....Plus, who wants to take the time to update songs everyday...Let the pros do it..and spend your time more efficiently...
By the way...lol...If a 4gb mp3 player for $30.00 is adequate entertainment for you...You don't need SIRIUS XM.....You are just a cheap person with limited needs in entertainment. You and your wife enjoy your great 4gb MP3 player.....You probably still use a VCR instead of paying for DVR service....You can get a VCR for $5.00 and no monthly charge....Keep using your old limited technology.....

Jerrold Williams
Thanks for your support


On Dec 22 07:19 AM tdw wrote:

> You've forgotten one important element--the content has to be GOOD.
> My wife and I subscribed to XM for two years, but the DJ's had no
> imagination and kept playing the same songs over and over, no matter...................]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/179042/comments?source=feed#comment-816286 816286
Jerrold Williams
Thanks for your support


On Dec 21 04:40 PM JPearce wrote:

> We finally agree on Stern. Howard has pulled this act before threatening
> to retire. Siri has gone overboard to accommodate Stern almost to
> the brink of Bankruptcy. Im sure Mel knows his worth which is alot
> less that what Stern thinks he is worth. Stern is a selling point
> to some but I definitely think he is over rated. We will find out
> what type of man he is and if he has any loyalty to a company that
> was on the brink of bankruptcy by signing such a over lucrative deal
> with Stern in the first place. With the guidance of Mel and Co. We
> are finally seeing light at the end of the tunnel.
> Im Siri Long!]]> Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:01:47 -0500
Jerrold Williams
Thanks for your support


On Dec 21 04:40 PM JPearce wrote:

> We finally agree on Stern. Howard has pulled this act before threatening
> to retire. Siri has gone overboard to accommodate Stern almost to
> the brink of Bankruptcy. Im sure Mel knows his worth which is alot
> less that what Stern thinks he is worth. Stern is a selling point
> to some but I definitely think he is over rated. We will find out
> what type of man he is and if he has any loyalty to a company that
> was on the brink of bankruptcy by signing such a over lucrative deal
> with Stern in the first place. With the guidance of Mel and Co. We
> are finally seeing light at the end of the tunnel.
> Im Siri Long!]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/179042/comments?source=feed#comment-816003 816003 Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:30:14 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/179042/comments?source=feed#comment-815660 815660 Good luck to you!

Jerrold Williams


On Dec 21 10:18 AM JPearce wrote:

> Perhaps you and Pell are right. But with a declining stock price.(We)
> need to think of accumulating more stock. With the decrease of the
> stock and more certainty of a R/S. I do not see the reasoning not
> to purchase more stock.
> Im Siri Long! I really do appreciate hearing both sides of the
> arguments,discussions and assumptions. Ii remember after the delisting
> notice the stock tanked to 0.50 but then rebounded to the mid $0.65.
> Now we are on the way down again when all information shows our stock
> price should be catapulting forward with a positive 4th quarter.
> Purchasing cheaper stock at the right time will be beneficial in
> the long run.
> Thanks RAF,Pell, Jerrold I learn alot from your post. Yo Soy JPearce!
>
>
>
> On Dec 21 10:02 AM Jerrold Williams wrote:]]> Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:25:21 -0500 Good luck to you!

Jerrold Williams


On Dec 21 10:18 AM JPearce wrote:

> Perhaps you and Pell are right. But with a declining stock price.(We)
> need to think of accumulating more stock. With the decrease of the
> stock and more certainty of a R/S. I do not see the reasoning not
> to purchase more stock.
> Im Siri Long! I really do appreciate hearing both sides of the
> arguments,discussions and assumptions. Ii remember after the delisting
> notice the stock tanked to 0.50 but then rebounded to the mid $0.65.
> Now we are on the way down again when all information shows our stock
> price should be catapulting forward with a positive 4th quarter.
> Purchasing cheaper stock at the right time will be beneficial in
> the long run.
> Thanks RAF,Pell, Jerrold I learn alot from your post. Yo Soy JPearce!
>
>
>
> On Dec 21 10:02 AM Jerrold Williams wrote:]]>