Seeking Alpha

mediapro » Comments » Single Comment |

  • 'U.S. Banking System Is Effectively Insolvent' - Soros [View article]
    And we have James Baker to thank for orchestrating the takeover of the U.S. electoral process which led to the culmination of Friedmanomics' wacky trickle-down (gimme all your money and I'll decide what to do with it) scheme.

    Why should one listen to someone who led the coup d'etat?


    On Apr 08 02:15 PM dcb wrote:

    > How Washington can prevent 'zombie banks'
    >
    > By James Baker
    >
    > Published: March 2 2009 02:00 | Last updated: March 2 2009 02:00
    >
    >
    > Beginning in 1990, Japan suffered a collapse in real estate and stock
    > market prices that pushed major banks into insolvency. Rather than
    > follow America's tough recommendation - and close or recapitalise
    > these banks - Japan took an easier approach. It kept banks marginally
    > functional through explicit or implicit guarantees and piecemeal
    > government bail-outs. The resulting "zombie banks" - neither alive
    > nor dead - could not support economic growth.
    >
    > A period of feeble economic performance called Japan's "lost decade"
    > resulted.
    >
    > Unfortunately, the US may be repeating Japan's mistake by viewing
    > our current banking crisis as one of liquidity and not solvency.
    > Most proposals advanced thus far assume that, once confidence in
    > financial markets is restored, banks will recover.
    >
    > But if their assumption is wrong, we risk perpetuating US zombie
    > banks and suffering a lost American decade.
    >
    > Evidence - a mountain of toxic assets, housing market declines, a
    > sharp economic recession, rising unemployment and increasing taxpayer
    > exposure through guarantees, loans, and infusion of capital - strongly
    > suggests that some American banks face a solvency problem and not
    > merely a liquidity one.
    >
    > We should act decisively. First, we need to understand the scope
    > of the problem. The Treasury department - working with the Federal
    > Reserve - must swiftly analyse the solvency of big US banks. Treasury
    > secretary Timothy Geithner's proposed "stress tests" may work. Any
    > analyses, however, should include worst-case scenarios. We can hope
    > for the best but should be prepared for the worst.
    >
    > Next, we should divide the banks into three groups: the healthy,
    > the hopeless and the needy. Leave the healthy alone and quickly close
    > the hopeless. The needy should be reorganised and recapitalised,
    > preferably through private investment or debt-to-equity swaps but,
    > if necessary, through public funds. It is time for triage.
    >
    > To prevent a bank run, all depositors of recapitalised banks should
    > be fully guaranteed, even if their deposit exceeds the Federal Deposit
    > Insurance Corporation maximum of $250,000 (€197,000, £175,000). But
    > bank boards of directors and senior management should be replaced
    > and, unfortunately, shareholders will lose their investment. Optimally,
    > bondholders would be wiped out, too. But the risk of a crash in the
    > bond market means that bondholders may receive only a haircut. All
    > of this is harsh, but required if we are ultimately to return market
    > discipline to our financial sector.
    >
    > This is not a call for nationalisation but rather for a temporary
    > injection of public funds to clean up problem banks and return them
    > to private ownership as soon as possible. As president Ronald Reagan's
    > secretary of the Treasury, I abhor the idea of government ownership
    > - either partial or full - even if only temporary. Unfortunately,
    > we may have no choice. But we must be very careful. The government
    > should hold equity no longer than necessary to restructure the banks,
    > resume normal lending and recoup at least a portion of taxpayer investment.
    >
    >
    > After replacing bank management with new private managers, the government
    > should have no say in banks' day-to-day operations.
    >
    > The FDIC can assist. Just this year, it has placed over a dozen American
    > banks - admittedly all small - into receivership. We might also consider
    > setting up something akin to the Resolution Trust Corporation, created
    > in 1989 to liquidate the assets of failed savings and loans. The
    > RTC eventually disposed of nearly $400bn in assets of more than 700
    > insolvent thrifts.
    >
    > To avoid bank runs and contain market disruption, the Treasury should
    > announce its decisions at one time. Washington will also need to
    > co-ordinate its actions with other major capitals, especially in
    > western Europe and east Asia. At best, this will encourage other
    > countries to take similar steps with their own banking systems. At
    > a minimum, other governments can prepare for the financial turmoil
    > associated with the announcement.
    >
    > This approach is not pretty or easy. It will cost a lot of money,
    > with the lion's share coming from US taxpayers, at least in the short
    > to medium term. But the alternative - a piecemeal pumping of more
    > public money into insolvent banks in the vague hope that things will
    > improve down the road - could truly be historic folly.
    >
    > Eventually our banks and economy will start to recover. When they
    > do, we would be wise to avoid another Japanese mistake - raising
    > taxes. To counter mounting debt created by government stimulus packages,
    > Japan increased taxes in 1997. Consumption dropped and the country's
    > economy collapsed.
    >
    > Our ad hoc approach to the banking crisis has helped financial institutions
    > conceal losses, favoured shareholders over taxpayers, and protected
    > senior bank managers from the consequences of their mistakes. Worst
    > of all, it has crippled our credit system just at a time when the
    > US and the world need to see it healthy.
    >
    > Many are to blame for the current situation. But we have no time
    > for finger-pointing or partisan posturing. This crisis demands a
    > pragmatic, comprehensive plan. We simply cannot continue to muddle
    > through it with a Band-Aid approach.
    >
    > During the 1990s, American officials routinely urged their Japanese
    > counterparts to kill their zombie banks before they could do more
    > damage to Japan's economy. Today, it would be irresponsible if we
    > did not heed our own advice.
    >
    > James A. Baker III was chief of staff and Treasury secretary for
    > President Ronald Reagan and secretary of State for President George
    > H.W. Bush
    >
    > Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2009
    Apr 08 19:49 pm |Rating: +3 -2
All Comments by mediapro »
Comments by Ticker
mediapro's
Comments Stats
178 comments
Rating: -15 (135 - 150 )