Seeking Alpha

James Biringer » Comments » XLF

  • The Anatomy of a Bear Market [View article]
    Good article, Eben. Here's a blurb I sent out kinda along the same thoughts you had. I'm no expert or guru, but I think I'm smart enough to think for myself and make my own decisions.


    >>>>
    Dear Investors,

    Maybe it's me, but I got a nagging thought
    rolling around in my head the last few months.
    And I heard a quick mention of a similar thought
    on Fast Money tonight.

    Let me see if I got this right. I'll try my best to put
    my thoughts into some type of cohesive essay.


    ----------------------...


    The investment banks are marking down drastically
    their assets in the CDO and CMO funds they put together.
    Investors bought into these vehicles through bonds and
    bond funds made up of all these SIV's.

    Alright, let's see now. I got a slice of a bond fund made
    up of a mix of prime, alt a, and subprime mortgages.
    There's all kinds of hullabaloo going around, and I have
    to mark to market my bond fund CMO's.

    Wait a minute. There's no market for my bond fund of CMO's
    because of a high level of fear by investors. Shoot. I have to
    market to a market that barely exists at this point. Alright.
    I mark to market my fund of CMO's and find I'm 70% down
    right now. This asset, according to the market is worth 70%
    less than what it was worth last year, or whenever.

    But...is it really worth 70% less?? I would argue no. Because,
    if I ride this out, that same market, imho, will give me true value
    in a year or two. And not for nuthin', true value, not market value,
    is the real worth of the asset I'm holding right now.

    For instance, if I put a real negative number on my CMO, I'd have
    to say that 20% of my mortgages in the CMO are non performing.
    But the market is marking down my bond fund of CMO's by 70%.
    And another thing, those NPA's are still worth something. This is
    real estate. Okay, let's say it's devalued by, I don't know, 20%
    for pete's sake. Well 20% ain't 70%. That's a lot different.

    I know, to unscramble the NPA's out of the bond fund of CMO's is
    gonna bear some cost for admin, foreclosure, and general nuisance
    fees.

    But 70%??

    I'm not seeing it.


    ----------------------...


    I guess what I'm saying is some of this is getting overblown
    in my book. Could be wrong. But I think, that at the margin,
    there's definately two sides to this plug nickel. If that makes
    any sense.



    Thank You,
    James Biringer
    Co - Moderator - Intelligent Investors Group
    finance.groups.yahoo.c.../
    Owner - Verizon401k Newsgroup
    finance.groups.yahoo.c.../

    The opinions expressed in this email are
    those of James Biringer. They are not
    intended to be recommendations of any
    security, only his opinion. As always,
    investors should do their own
    due diligence and research, and invest with
    caution. James Biringer reserves the
    right to change orders at the last minute,
    cancel the order entirely, and add orders
    not advanced to the group, due to time
    constraints and changing market conditions.
    Feb 26 20:20 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
More on XLF by James Biringer
Comments by Ticker
James Biringer's
Comments Stats
18 comments
Rating: 0 (0 - 0 )