Seeking Alpha

GDS » Comments |

Sort by:
Latest | Highest rated
  • The Pickens Plan Changes Its Strategy [View article]
    There is only one person that T. Boone cares about and that is T. BOONE! The media as usual swallows all his hype without and research into what is entailed with any of his plans.

    In the real world there are only 2 (two) insurance companies that insure the storage and distribution of LNG, CNG, Propane or any other form of natural gas. Guess what! Their cost are like medical malpractice insurance and for good reason. Accidents that involve this fuel have the highest mortality rate of any type of energy accident. Multiply that time 10's of thousands fueling points necessary to properly distribute natural gas products and you can see the dilemma.

    In the Authors last paragraph he mentions methanol. Methanol hasn't been used as a fuel additive for the masses in the US for at least 20 years. Groundwater contaminated with Methanol is almost impossible to clean up, No one in the industry willl touch it, except for limited uses.

    Nov 18 09:24 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Obama and McCain Square Off on Solar [View article]
    I agree with THE HAND as well! He boiled it down to the very basics. Now if we could just get both political parties to spend the time for energy, rather than continually trying to social engineer us to death.

    It's been 35 years since our first taste of how ENERGY could be used as a political weapon and they have done absolutey NOTHING!
    Nov 01 08:50 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Yesterday's Crude Spike: Most Cut-and-Dry Case of Speculation Yet [View article]
    Bullish on Oil my butt! Ike put the double whammy on the shorts, no crude, no delivery. This too will soon pass. You might say the shorts took it in the shorts.:)
    Sep 23 09:28 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Did Big Oil Take Advantage of Light, Sweet Crude? [View article]
    Charts are interesting, however most any data can be presented to support one's basic premise. You have failed to include the rack-to-retail (wholesale price paid versus the retail price it was sold for) spread of gasoline. Actually the EIA data is very limited to the rack-to-retail areas covered. A source like OPIS is much more detailed and accurate for the rack-to-retail spread. If you would have included a rack-to-retail study, you would find a margin squeeze when crude spikes and a spread as crude declines.

    I would imagine you could show the crude prices were the inverse to the financial sector during these same periods as players moved their money from one sector to the other, which I might suggest is more accurate. Just look at last week’s crude price spike. Using the EIA’s data would have indicated a big price drop, however the financials outlook outweighed crude inventories hence a short lived crude spike. That is not to say that crude won’t rise over the long run.

    One final point, the Big Oil Companies are not the largest retailers of gasoline in the USA. Branded as well as unbranded wholesalers have a much larger market share. Most branded i.e., Exxon-Mobile, Shell, Chevron, etc., retail units are owned and operated by independent wholesalers. Virtually all home heating oil is supplied by independent wholesalers. Very few of these companies are publicly traded.
    Aug 24 12:32 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
Comments by Ticker
GDS's
Comments Stats
4 comments
Rating: 0 (0 - 0 )