my2bits

Don’t Blame Wall Street - At Least Not Completely

The people that are being foreclosed, primarily those who initially received subprime mortgages, should never have been given a loan to buy a house. These people were renters and will become renters again. Although it’s always tough to see somebody lose their home, the people being foreclosed on are not your typical American homeowners. They probably put a low or no down payment on the home, and had interest only payments probably not a lot different than they would have paid if they had continually rented.
The foreclosed houses are now flooding the market, and that excess inventory will be sold over time, then the normal supply and demand will work within the housing market.
This situation does not justify a $700,000,000,000 bailout for the banking institutions. The banking institutions that invested in these mortgages made a terrible mistake. The American System of capitalism allows people to make mistakes and go out of business. That’s the way the System Works.
If Congress agrees to the $700,000,000,000 bailout, this will bring the total government intervention to approximately one trillion dollars. This is a huge amount of money.
Forget any type of universal Health Care, look for downside adjustments in Social Security, Medicare and veterans benefits. There will now be significantly less money, for things we really need, like university education, infrastructure, dealing with catastrophic climate change, and all of the other things that we depended upon the Federal government to help finance.
Let’s give a thought to what would happen if the United States defaulted on its debt? I personally believe it’s not a question of if, it’s a question of when. Economic experts have predicted that the total cost of the war in Iraq, including long-term care of the seriously disabled veterans, will probably reach three trillion dollars. Plus you add the $700,000,000,000 bailout, to our already enormous debt, over $10,000,000,000,000. And of course we have the baby boomers starting to retire, this huge bubble in our population now starting to retire, will put a huge financial burden on Social Security and Medicare. I think we are in grave danger of not being able to afford even the interest payments on that debt, and default may be the ultimate answer. So if you believe the above scenario, now we are looking at a real financial disruption for the entire world economy.
As far as a lack of liquidity in our economic system, this basically means loans. Making loans to home buyers to and corporations is a profitable and legitimate business. There are many institutions in the world that are in the business of lending, they have sufficient liquidity to make the loans that America needs. We need to think globally in the global marketplace. Like it or not that is the reality of the world today.
Modern economics dictates that when bad decisions are made in business those businesses usually fail, and other businesses will take their place. Some will make it some will not. If there’s profit to be made, and capital available somewhere, capital will come and the job will be done.
Markets will prevail, we really do not need to bail out the rich guys one more time; on the backs of the working people and the taxpayers.
Neil Davis in Rocklin California
ronna_and_Neil @ hotmail.com

No Matter Who's Elected, Alternative Energy Wins

Our future economy and our competitive position in the world will depend on inexpensive and abundant energy. Energy is the basis of all of the world’s economies. The country that has the lowest cost of clean energy will have a significant leg up in the future world economy.

The primary source of energy for most of the economies in the world today is oil, coal and natural gas. These are commodities that are purchased on a worldwide market. We all pay the going rate and therefore we all have the same basic cost of energy.

We are currently faced with peak oil. In the next few years our existing oil will diminish and demand will increase. Supply and demand dictates that the world wide price of oil will continue to escalate.

A new paradigm for worldwide economic competition:
The country that has the lowest cost of energy will be able to supply goods and services to the world for a lower cost or a higher profit margin. This would also mean a higher standard of living and a more robust economy for a country that has the lowest cost of clean energy.

Sufficient amounts of clean energy, will probably necessitate constructing multiple large nuclear power plants. Wind, solar, geothermal, tide and wave power are all great and will probably not be enough to meet the realistic demands of our economy.
Basically we need to:
• Add a carbon tax or cap and trade system that will sufficiently add to the cost of those who pollute. Use the revenue from this tax to subsidize alternative energy.
• Carbon and pollution cost will also need to be added to imported goods.
• Fast track the construction of nuclear power plants and utilize the technology that will transfer large amounts of power for long distances with little or no line loss.
• Add a tax to gasoline that will gradually increase, on a timescale, to a very significant amount. This tax money will go into a fund that can only be used to subsidize the purchase of the cleanest most gasoline efficient cars.

The abundant power of the nuclear plants can also be used to generate hydrogen gas. The hydrogen gas can be used in many ways; a substitute for gasoline, diesel, home heating, etc.

The gasoline tax and subsidy for the purchase of small clean cars will dramatically change the cars that are produced. The manufacturers will be scrambling to create the cars that receive the greatest percentage of the subsidy. Theoretically one could buy the equivalent of a Toyota Prius and have the government pay for one half or more.

These are drastic economy shaking ideas.

The reality of our needing to eliminate our dependence on foreign oil and the immediate and real threat of catastrophic climate change, justify and demand drastic changes.

Creating our new energy environment, and fast tracking these changes, will invigorate our present economy. Fast tracking means, environmental impact report not needed and a moratorium on lawsuits. The environmental impact of the status quo is obvious.

Neil Davis in Rocklin Calif.
Ronna_and_neil@hotmail...












Our future economy and our competitive position in the world will depend on inexpensive and abundant energy. Energy is the basis of all of the world’s economies. The country that has the lowest cost of clean energy will have a significant leg up in the future world economy.

The primary source of energy for most of the economies in the world today is oil, coal and natural gas. These are commodities that are purchased on a worldwide market. We all pay the going rate and therefore we all have the same basic cost of energy.

We are currently faced with peak oil. In the next few years our existing oil will diminish and demand will increase. Supply and demand dictates that the world wide price of oil will continue to escalate.

A new paradigm for worldwide economic competition:
The country that has the lowest cost of energy will be able to supply goods and services to the world for a lower cost or a higher profit margin. This would also mean a higher standard of living and a more robust economy for a country that has the lowest cost of clean energy.

Sufficient amounts of clean energy, will probably necessitate constructing multiple large nuclear power plants. Wind, solar, geothermal, tide and wave power are all great and will probably not be enough to meet the realistic demands of our economy.
Basically we need to:
• Add a carbon tax or cap and trade system that will sufficiently add to the cost of those who pollute. Use the revenue from this tax to subsidize alternative energy.
• Carbon and pollution cost will also need to be added to imported goods.
• Fast track the construction of nuclear power plants and utilize the technology that will transfer large amounts of power for long distances with little or no line loss.
• Add a tax to gasoline that will gradually increase, on a timescale, to a very significant amount. This tax money will go into a fund that can only be used to subsidize the purchase of the cleanest most gasoline efficient cars.

The abundant power of the nuclear plants can also be used to generate hydrogen gas. The hydrogen gas can be used in many ways; a substitute for gasoline, diesel, home heating, etc.

The gasoline tax and subsidy for the purchase of small clean cars will dramatically change the cars that are produced. The manufacturers will be scrambling to create the cars that receive the greatest percentage of the subsidy. Theoretically one could buy the equivalent of a Toyota Prius and have the government pay for one half or more.

These are drastic economy shaking ideas.

The reality of our needing to eliminate our dependence on foreign oil and the immediate and real threat of catastrophic climate change, justify and demand drastic changes.

Creating our new energy environment, and fast tracking these changes, will invigorate our present economy. Fast tracking means, environmental impact report not needed and a moratorium on lawsuits. The environmental impact of the status quo is obvious.

Neil Davis in Rocklin Calif.
Ronna_and_neil@hotmail...

The U.S. Banking System is Effectively Insolvent

The people that are being foreclosed, primarily those who initially received subprime mortgages, should never have been given a loan to buy a house. These people were renters and will become renters again. Although it’s always tough to see somebody lose their home, the people being foreclosed on are not your typical American homeowners. They probably put a low or no down payment on the home, and had interest only payments probably not a lot different than they would have paid if they had continually rented.
The foreclosed houses are now flooding the market, and that excess inventory will be sold over time, then the normal supply and demand will work within the housing market.
This situation does not justify a $700,000,000,000 bailout for the banking institutions. The banking institutions that invested in these mortgages made a terrible mistake. The American System of capitalism allows people to make mistakes and go out of business. That’s the way the System Works.
If Congress agrees to the $700,000,000,000 bailout, this will bring the total government intervention to approximately one trillion dollars. This is a huge amount of money.
Forget any type of universal Health Care, look for downside adjustments in Social Security, Medicare and veterans benefits. There will now be significantly less money, for things we really need, like university education, infrastructure, dealing with catastrophic climate change, and all of the other things that we depended upon the Federal government to help finance.
Let’s give a thought to what would happen if the United States defaulted on its debt? I personally believe it’s not a question of if, it’s a question of when. Economic experts have predicted that the total cost of the war in Iraq, including long-term care of the seriously disabled veterans, will probably reach three trillion dollars. Plus you add the $700,000,000,000 bailout, to our already enormous debt, over $10,000,000,000,000. And of course we have the baby boomers starting to retire, this huge bubble in our population now starting to retire, will put a huge financial burden on Social Security and Medicare. I think we are in grave danger of not being able to afford even the interest payments on that debt, and default may be the ultimate answer. So if you believe the above scenario, now we are looking at a real financial disruption for the entire world economy.
As far as a lack of liquidity in our economic system, this basically means loans. Making loans to home buyers to and corporations is a profitable and legitimate business. There are many institutions in the world that are in the business of lending, they have sufficient liquidity to make the loans that America needs. We need to think globally in the global marketplace. Like it or not that is the reality of the world today.
Modern economics dictates that when bad decisions are made in business those businesses usually fail, and other businesses will take their place. Some will make it some will not. If there’s profit to be made, and capital available somewhere, capital will come and the job will be done.
Markets will prevail, we really do not need to bail out the rich guys one more time; on the backs of the working people and the taxpayers.
Neil Davis in Rocklin California
ronna_and_Neil @ hotmail.com

What is Hank Paulson Thinking?

The people that are being foreclosed, primarily those who initially received subprime mortgages, should never have been given a loan to buy a house. These people were renters and will become renters again. Although it’s always tough to see somebody lose their home, the people being foreclosed on are not your typical American homeowners. They probably put a low or no down payment on the home, and had interest only payments probably not a lot different than they would have paid if they had continually rented.
The foreclosed houses are now flooding the market, and that excess inventory will be sold over time, then the normal supply and demand will work within the housing market.
This situation does not justify a $700,000,000,000 bailout for the banking institutions. The banking institutions that invested in these mortgages made a terrible mistake. The American System of capitalism allows people to make mistakes and go out of business. That’s the way the System Works.
If Congress agrees to the $700,000,000,000 bailout, this will bring the total government intervention to approximately one trillion dollars. This is a huge amount of money.
Forget any type of universal Health Care, look for downside adjustments in Social Security, Medicare and veterans benefits. There will now be significantly less money, for things we really need, like university education, infrastructure, dealing with catastrophic climate change, and all of the other things that we depended upon the Federal government to help finance.
Let’s give a thought to what would happen if the United States defaulted on its debt? I personally believe it’s not a question of if, it’s a question of when. Economic experts have predicted that the total cost of the war in Iraq, including long-term care of the seriously disabled veterans, will probably reach three trillion dollars. Plus you add the $700,000,000,000 bailout, to our already enormous debt, over $10,000,000,000,000. And of course we have the baby boomers starting to retire, this huge bubble in our population now starting to retire, will put a huge financial burden on Social Security and Medicare. I think we are in grave danger of not being able to afford even the interest payments on that debt, and default may be the ultimate answer. So if you believe the above scenario, now we are looking at a real financial disruption for the entire world economy.
As far as a lack of liquidity in our economic system, this basically means loans. Making loans to home buyers to and corporations is a profitable and legitimate business. There are many institutions in the world that are in the business of lending, they have sufficient liquidity to make the loans that America needs. We need to think globally in the global marketplace. Like it or not that is the reality of the world today.
Modern economics dictates that when bad decisions are made in business those businesses usually fail, and other businesses will take their place. Some will make it some will not. If there’s profit to be made, and capital available somewhere, capital will come and the job will be done.
Markets will prevail, we really do not need to bail out the rich guys one more time; on the backs of the working people and the taxpayers.
Neil Davis in Rocklin California
ronna_and_Neil @ hotmail.com

BrightSource Energy Sounds Off on the Realities of U.S. Energy Policy

Our future economy and our competitive position in the world will depend on inexpensive and abundant energy. Energy is the basis of all of the world’s economies.

The country that has the lowest cost of clean energy will have a significant leg up in the future world economy.

The primary source of energy for most of the economies in the world today is oil, coal and natural gas. These are commodities that are purchased on a worldwide market. We all pay the going rate and therefore we all have the same basic cost of energy.

We are currently faced with peak oil. In the next few years our existing oil will diminish and demand will increase. Supply and demand dictates that the world wide price of oil will continue to escalate.

A new paradigm for worldwide economic competition:
The country that has the lowest cost of energy will be able to supply goods and services to the world for a lower cost or a higher profit margin. This would also mean a higher standard of living and a more robust economy for a country that has the lowest cost of clean energy.

Sufficient amounts of clean energy, will probably necessitate constructing multiple large nuclear power plants. Wind, solar, geothermal, tide and wave power are all great and will probably not be enough to meet the realistic demands of our economy.
Basically we need to:
• Add a carbon tax or cap and trade system that will sufficiently add to the cost of those who pollute. Use the revenue from this tax to subsidize alternative energy.
• Carbon and pollution cost will also need to be added to imported goods.
• Fast track the construction of nuclear power plants and utilize the technology that will transfer large amounts of power for long distances with little or no line loss.
• Add a tax to gasoline that will gradually increase, on a timescale, to a very significant amount. This tax money will go into a fund that can only be used to subsidize the purchase of the cleanest most gasoline efficient cars.

The abundant power of the nuclear plants can also be used to generate hydrogen gas. The hydrogen gas can be used in many ways; a substitute for gasoline, diesel, home heating, etc.

The gasoline tax and subsidy for the purchase of small clean cars will dramatically change the cars that are produced. The manufacturers will be scrambling to create the cars that receive the greatest percentage of the subsidy. Theoretically one could buy the equivalent of a Toyota Prius and have the government pay for one half or more.

These are drastic economy shaking ideas.

The reality of our needing to eliminate our dependence on foreign oil and the immediate and real threat of catastrophic climate change, justify and demand drastic changes.

Creating our new energy environment, and fast tracking these changes, will invigorate our present economy. Fast tracking means, environmental impact report not needed and a moratorium on lawsuits. The environmental impact of the status quo is obvious.


















nter your comment here

No Matter Who's Elected, Alternative Energy Wins

I believe that Rikiki is right on course.
Adding a significant tax on gasoline, and using that money only to subsidize the purchase of clean and fuel efficient cars will solve two major problems.
The worlds car manufactures would follow the demand and make a huge shift to producing the most subsidized cars.
The US would quickly reduce our oil imports.
Help to avoid catastrophic climate change.
here