Seeking Alpha

JohnAl » Comments » DIA

  • As Goes GM, So Goes the Country [View article]
    Excellent article!

    It remains to be seen how GM will fare after it's bailout bankruptcy. The crony capitalist manner in which this went down has also disturbed many potential buyers. I wonder how many will now swear off GM, and how that sentiment may damage their future.
    Jun 03 05:36 am |Rating: +3 0 |Link to Comment
  • Nothing About This Economy Is Surprising [View article]
    “The doorstep to the temple of wisdom is a knowledge of our own ignorance.”
    - Benjamin Franklin

    Our problem is that we are not being led by wise men.

    We're being led by men and women who think that they are smarter and more knowledgeable than our ancestors, and thus that history cannot teach us anything.

    If there is even one among us today who possesses the insights of Thomas Jefferson, then he is staying well hidden. Yet even the average Joes, not to mention the arrogant politicians, dismiss Jefferson's warnings about central banking as quaint. "Things are different now", they rationalize.

    But things are actually the same. People will always try to find ways to exert power over others and steal from them. When you get right down to it, while we walk around in well tailored clothing and put men on the moon, we're just a bunch of well dressed uberchimps with the ability to build things.

    History tells us that human liberty to the degree experienced in this country only comes around rarely. I count myself fortunate to have experienced it, even if only at the tail end of the run.

    I'm afraid it's gone though, and won't be seen again in this country for a very long time.

    Apr 30 08:19 am |Rating: +7 -1 |Link to Comment
  • What Will This Crisis Lead to? [View article]
    "Obama is better than the other guy, and by extension Obama's choice of Bernanke and Geithner is almost certainly better than the team the other guy would have installed. Let me change that: NOT ALMOST CERTAINLY BETTER, BUT DEFINITELY BETTER! "

    F.E.B., you seem to see the world, as so many amazingly still do, as strictly D vs R. Anyone critical of D must be a proponent of R and vise versa, when in fact, many of us critical of Obama recognize that both McCain and Obama were terrible choices because both are big government proponents neither of whom has ever seen a problem that he didn't think the federal government should attempt to solve.

    I may be way wrong, but I sense that there is a true political realignment taking place. The D v R alignment is being replaced by Big v Small federal government political sides. The big banker bailout last fall was the shock that many of us on both the right and left needed in order to clearly see the US federal government for what it truly has become - an oligarchy controlled by large, favored corporations.

    The tea parties and future like protests are in large part reactions to this 21st century fascism.
    Apr 22 13:43 pm |Rating: +9 -2 |Link to Comment
  • Are We at the Beginning of the Next Bull Market? Probably Not [View article]
    "Let put the record straight. The Great Depression started on October 29, 1929 (Republican Hoover in power). February, 1930 Treasury Sec. Andrew Mellon announces that the Fed will standby as the market works itself out. This philosophy continued through 1931. By 1932 over 10,000 banks failed and 80% of the markets value is lost. Hoover did little to late and FDR won the election and took over in 1933. By 1934 the markets began to recover. "

    toobad41, you really need to reread your history. Looking at this as a Democrat vs Republican issue is missing reality entirely. Hoover wasn't the free marketer that he's made out to be by history teachers in the gubmint schools, he was a classic economic interventionist. In an attempt to spend the country out of the depression Hoover increased federal spending and the deficit so dramatically that FDR railed against it in the 1932 campaign. He also pressured business to prop up wage rates and it was he, not FDR, who started the depression era public works programs.

    The Hoover/FDR to Bush/Obama parallels are astounding. Just as Bush was no free marketer, neither was Hoover. And just as FDR turned out to be Hoover on steroids, so it appears that Obama is Bush on steroids.

    The Hoover/FDR interventionism stifled the recovery and kept the country in depression for a decade and a half. Let's just hope America comes to it's senses and we don't suffer the same fate in today's Bush/Obama depression.
    Apr 20 20:05 pm |Rating: +2 0 |Link to Comment
  • Grand Illusion: The Federal Reserve (Part 3) [View article]
    "Someday Americans will understand that Federal Reserve bankers have no magic ability – and certainly no legal or moral right – to decide how much money should exist and what the cost of borrowing money should be." (Ron Paul, July 11, 2006)

    Man oh man, Dr. Paul, I do wish Americans would understand sooner rather than later!
    Mar 10 19:18 pm |Rating: +2 -2 |Link to Comment
  • Stop Trying to Jump-Start the Consumer - Barron's Interview [View article]
    Mr. Albertson is right.

    Time will heal the economy. What we are experiencing today, after all, is nothing more than the economy readjusting to the malinvestments made during the growth of the artificially created credit bubble. The government's attempt to reflate the credit bubble is the wrong medicine at the wrong time and will only prolong the readjustment period.
    Feb 16 18:15 pm |Rating: +3 0 |Link to Comment
  • Economy Watch: What if Stocks Were Priced in Gold? [View article]
    Mr. Ahlgren, another well thought out and well written article. Thanks.

    Your reasoning is sound. Like you, I've lost confidence in the dollar, but it appears that we're either wrong or early. I'm in gold, but I'm still hedging my bets. They may be able to patch this thing up one more time. People want to believe in the dollar, which comes down to belief in the US government. Obama popularity polls may be the best indicator out there. The expectations are high that he's going to be able to fix things. To the degree his popularity wanes that's an indication that "hope and change" are on the decline. That's an indication that it's time to buy more gold.

    Gdog, your's was a very interesting comment. Especially this:

    "Productive ideas, innovation, intellectual capital, these are the things the are important in a knowledge economy, in any economy. This is where uninhibited scare resources always flow.

    Investment in the US is all that matters. New technologies, new energy, wonderfully productive things yet thought of that will change and shape our lives. This is what the US does. It is what we are very good at.

    ... Come on people. Believe in this country!"

    I agree, but for the life of me I don't see how sound money, based on gold or something else, is incompatible with this. I don't see how sound money doesn't help this country.

    Why do you think fiat currency is good for the US or any country?
    Feb 02 19:12 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Orwellian Finance: Is 1984 Happening in 2009?  [View article]
    "Economic Recovery Program – This is Barrack Obama’s first contribution to Newspeak."

    erp... kinda sounds like the sound my dog makes when she's puking.
    Jan 19 17:33 pm |Rating: 0 -1 |Link to Comment
  • Orwellian Finance: Is 1984 Happening in 2009?  [View article]
    Great piece of writing Mr. Quinn, and some excellent commentary as well.

    I'm the world's biggest pessimist, but I'm starting to think that there IS hope for this country. There is a growing groundswell of opinion, at least as expressed here at SA, that we are off the tracks.
    Jan 19 17:31 pm |Rating: 0 -1 |Link to Comment
  • Here Comes the Foreclosure Cavalry [View article]
    Oops, I should have mentioned that I did find the article to be informative. Thx
    Dec 07 04:59 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Here Comes the Foreclosure Cavalry [View article]
    "The administration's blind eye to the impending crisis is emblematic of its governing philosophy, which trusted market forces and discounted the value of government intervention in the economy. Its belief ironically has ushered in the most massive government intervention since the 1930s. (yes, talk about IRONY!)"

    i'm getting tired of correcting this oft repeated falsehood but hey, somebody's gotta do it, so here goes.

    The mess was hardly a failure of capitalism. Anything but.

    First, everybody's playing with fiat, government created currency, in a play world where the interest rate has been manipulated via fractional reserve banking to be far lower than the reality that lenders would otherwise require in a free market financial system.

    Second, the lending came from GSEs that wouldn't exist in a free market, and the money found it's way into housing thanks to various government incentives.

    Yes, wall street's creation of the nasty derivatives could be considered capitalist, but in the bizarro world that discounts risk due to the false sense of security caused by over regulation and the accompanying belief that these investments are safe because the government's looking out for us, people actually bought this crap without worrying about the underlying investments. And other people, faked out by the same false sense of security insured the crap.

    And so now almost everybody believes that the fix is even more regulation and more intervention into the market until... until what? Until the whole thing implodes because anybody with any sense has moved all of their wealth into gold or tried looking for investment opportunities in less manipulated markets elsewhere.
    Dec 07 04:31 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Four Myths About the Free Market and Its 'Demise' [View article]
    "Would the free market do it better?"

    For crissake... we wouldn't even HAVE this mess if we had a free market.
    Oct 01 13:57 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
More on DIA by JohnAl
Comments by Ticker
JohnAl's
Comments Stats
99 comments
Rating: 323 (426 - 103 )