The Hopefully Not So Great Next Depression [View article]
"Useless and pretentious" - Like your entire post?
On Feb 01 09:24 AM Ferdinand E. Banks wrote:
> Interesting and informative, except for the use of the word "depression". > > There isn't going to be any depression. I tell people that I am the > leading academic energy economist in the world, which I probably > am, but I once taught a lot of macro too. I quit teaching it though > because I thought that most of it was useless - useless and pretentious > - but even so I think that I learned enough to know that if the high > and mighty keep their wits about them, they can get us out of this > thing. > > Keeping their wits about them begins with getting out of Irak and > Afghanistan. Wasn't it enough to win both of those wars? What's the > point in continuing to fight a war that was won. Where's the payoff? > > > Of course I recognize that for many people in this forum, a failure > by Obama is wish fulfillment. After all, if he and his team turn > the economy around in a couple of years, the democrats might be looking > at 16 years in the White House. Anybody want to tell me the odds > on a turnaround?
The Hopefully Not So Great Next Depression [View article]
PrudentMan, thanks for winding up the LibTards. Reading the frenzied and rambling responses to your comment made me laugh my butt off! Democrats are a strange breed, indeed.
The Hopefully Not So Great Next Depression [View article]
On Feb 01 09:24 AM Ferdinand E. Banks wrote:
> Interesting and informative, except for the use of the word "depression".
>
> There isn't going to be any depression. I tell people that I am the
> leading academic energy economist in the world, which I probably
> am, but I once taught a lot of macro too. I quit teaching it though
> because I thought that most of it was useless - useless and pretentious
> - but even so I think that I learned enough to know that if the high
> and mighty keep their wits about them, they can get us out of this
> thing.
>
> Keeping their wits about them begins with getting out of Irak and
> Afghanistan. Wasn't it enough to win both of those wars? What's the
> point in continuing to fight a war that was won. Where's the payoff?
>
>
> Of course I recognize that for many people in this forum, a failure
> by Obama is wish fulfillment. After all, if he and his team turn
> the economy around in a couple of years, the democrats might be looking
> at 16 years in the White House. Anybody want to tell me the odds
> on a turnaround?
The Hopefully Not So Great Next Depression [View article]
Why the Stimulus Plan Won't Work [View article]
On Jan 11 09:50 AM bosun.j wrote:
> He wasn't a war hero. He was an actor. He was the second worst president
> in American history.