dead elvis

When Should Sirius XM Implement a Reverse Split?

His name is Tuna Abundonza or Tuna Melt or Just Charlie and his ideas are underwater,

His predictions are on par w/Creamer


On Oct 20 10:09 AM Pell wrote:

> RAF, honestly and I do not wish to insult you. But did you sell open
> calls for January when SIRIXM was trading in 70s back in August?
>
>
> Because the real news will be did SIRI turn the corner in 3Q. The
> bonus would be a solid profit in 4Q.
>
> The gentleman (his name eludes me) from S&P believed SIRIXM will
> be at $1 by year end, do you disagree with his expertise in Media
> Stock. He has been correct since he stated the stock would hit $
> .50.
>
> Why would you risk any outside chance of bad news and not act on
> good news immediately?
>
> You confuse me. I can tell by your comments you are very intelligent,
> but on this point there is inconsistency in your comments.

When Should Sirius XM Implement a Reverse Split?

Todays lost article by the guys from sat waves vacationing in cabo.
I guess we will wait for them until the suntan oil and two carbon fragments run out.

WILL THE INCREASE IN I PHONE SALES BY APPLE AND THEIR RELEASE IN CHINA HAVE ANY IMPACT ON SIRI'S 3RD 4TH QUARTER CONFERENCE CALLS?


snooooooooze.

When Should Sirius XM Implement a Reverse Split?

no thank you

Marketing comes to the consumer sir- not the other way around.


On Oct 19 03:10 PM R A F wrote:

> If you want to see some effective marketing, go to Satwaves.com and
> you will be updated.

When Should Sirius XM Implement a Reverse Split?

no thank you

Marketing comes to the consumer sir- not the other way around.

When Should Sirius XM Implement a Reverse Split?

How can a company swallow the cost of a rocket/launch and not find the pennies to advertise.The entire thing makes no sense.

90 percent of the American public are clueless of this company

its true -try the public out

woundnt energy be better spent hounding/flooding them ie the company via email and phone calls to investor relations then jabbering re r/s?

i even saw a commercial this weekend for rapsody.com

pitiful

When Should Sirius XM Implement a Reverse Split?

All this is suspicious.

RAF for example- you perhaps are RAF 22 and have been seen writing on other sites for promotion of sirius product

Sirius doom may be aka wise one from msn etc

To make these discussions believable and not to dilute and waste others time, isnt it time for all of you/us to use disclosure yourselves as the initial author- Otherwise based on some of the comments- some of you are paid guns with ulterior motives and I fear you are quite bold about it.And, would just about sell your mothers wedding ring with it still attached to a pulsatile finger.

If any of you have a problem with this-and raise /or disagree/ your comments are worthless.

Whats with all the 7th grade secrecy?

When Should Sirius XM Implement a Reverse Split?

from the motley fool- that never well usually never writes good stuff re siri- today in fact-stop all your grumbling

a quote from their last line re monty python review this weekend
======================...
Sirius XM isn't as mangled as its stock price suggests. It's just a flesh wound.


My paraphrase-from MP

Lets finally look at the bright side of life. If not, go buy some shrubbery-For we are the knights who say" nich" . to shorts.

When Should Sirius XM Implement a Reverse Split?

Not one of you have predicted a thing this company has done correctly- But accordingly better off dead,I am obviously too stupid to render an actual opinion.

thank you cos1000 for the personal discount-who is really cos1600plus- whew

Of course insulting people is only part of your day job since it appears either you are unemployed in a job for yourself or you boss will axe your butt when he finds out that all you do is drool on your keyboard re this issue

I can not believe how you have all agonised over this issue-It didnt go BK in Feb, now did it?-

And if Mel said he didnt want an r/s unless needed- well i think you can take that to the bank as well

Day guy I agree with you but you give the company too much credit when you use the word management-

When you all break even, then what will you agonise over-

Far far too much emotion here- opps sorry Im dead.


On Oct 13 04:54 PM dayworker wrote:

> The issue is not a goal of $1.50. That was an example to show a comparison
> between spreads before and after a split. The best is to not reverse
> and have the p/s go to , $4,5, or 6. In order for the
> example of $1.50 to double their money it only has to go to $3. Otherwise
> on r/s the $15 has to go to $30 to double. When in the near future
> do you think it's going to $30? Isn't it more realistic, given better
> 3 and 4 q reports that it could go to more than $1.50.
> If the logic is that a r/s means bigger players will invest because
> the p/s is higher, but the fundamental of pe is actually the same
> percentage wise, then why risk greater capital to achieve more return
> when the resistance also increases. The logic fails because if there
> were no delisting pressure would the idea of r/s split be a better
> strategy on it's own merits to raise p/s. It doesn't. Again, it's
> only being discussed because of the delisting rule not the merits
> of
> market invetsment strategy. Think like management and you will see
> it from a different point of view.
> In regards to comparison of Priceline and other stocks with successful
> r/s, the difference is competence and honesty of management. SIRI
> management has not shown the competence to long term strategy, a
> good business model for share holders and
> future debt organization that didn't serve mangement. For instance,
> the high salaries and stock options they get, the outragoeus pay
> out
> to talent that caused extensive cash bleeding when the budget was
>
> deep in debt and they did nothing to cut the high talent outlay.
> The company is in trouble partly because of greedy management as
> well as the economic factors and the delayed merger. Other corp.'s
> that r/s successfully were under competent and honest management.

When Should Sirius XM Implement a Reverse Split?

Good Lord - whatever- Even Mel doesnt know what you just wrote
The putz ceo of enron didnt even know what zipcode the company was in. Do you really think that this Mel guy , this elder cigar smoking over tanned individual is knowledgable? No is the answer.

Regardless of all that..stuff-The fundamentals of the company have been lost

The premise- if you build it they will come- is a dead isssue

The company is floating on their product at best.

The questions during conference calls are lame and dont allow Mel to really state future guidance.

So once again- just dumb- or dumb like fox?

When Should Sirius XM Implement a Reverse Split?

Mr Pell

Interesting take- But I think it is up to the company to promote itself- a prime example is not selling their shares for cash - at least for now.

Any good company should
not rely on investors to buy up 3 billion of outstanding shares
so that management can reap rewards.

Like Ive said before either they are stupid or smart like fox-I think the latter- and they know something is in the wind, hense, they do absolutly nothing for promotion other then hire guys from alpha to stir an empty pot.

When Should Sirius XM Implement a Reverse Split?

So I see you didnt find the mute button

What price do you think is tempting to attract international attention?

$5.00, $10.00.$15.00?????

A buy is a buy at any price.Smart investors know that.

Many, pink sheeted stocks have done very very well

Dont get your point. Institutional investors dont like small stocks because the price percentage is too volitale on a day to day but so what - if it is worthy/ they will buy it.

Adios


On Oct 13 10:13 AM Pell wrote:

> Southern I didn't listen to Siri-Doom I heard what he was saying
> and put it into the right context. Siri-Doom was preaching a the
> split as bad, I am preaching it as good. The US Stock market with
> a weak US $ is ripe for international investors. SiriXM is trading
> at too low a price to attract attention not only from international
> investors but institutional investors. So think about it and then
> comment. SiriusXM is part of the market and doesn't have a life of
> its own. We need SiriusXM's stock to get in the game. I am a SIRI
> LONG with a good amount of shares and I am preaching to BUY BUY BUY
> while we all can still afford 1,000 share blocks (soon to be 100
> share blocks).
>
> So please read and comprehend my position then comment. Your comment
> was stricting emotional.

When Should Sirius XM Implement a Reverse Split?

There is a great four letter word you have on your remote called mute.

It silences annoying sounds.

And, gives peace to all sitting near it.

If all of the gagets released are functional by this company which you the writers(with pretty pictures) have hammered about for the last six months, the "Bobs Big Boy" satellite they shot up from Russia is functional, there are truely prospects in South America and in the far east, and they most importantly advertise for the holidays which includes Festivus-to sell this stuff-well.......Im waiting.....

In other words we dont need a waaambulance here for R/S if the company just does what it is supposed to.

An R/S gives little faith that the company can manage itself in spite of all the candy this company has to give out

End of story- go play the third round.
Wheres my remote?

When Should Sirius XM Implement a Reverse Split?

The person with the lowest aggregate score for the four days of golf decides the winner of the tournament.

That's how it works Brandon.

Could you at least wait until the third (Q3) round is over to project a winner?

There is plenty of time to write about this stuff before you get everyones panties in a wad

With articles as this you prompte yourself as Sirius Long.

Do you have enough shares to make one unit if it does split?

Speaking of wad...................

Sirius Can Avoid Bankruptcy

Sir Doom


We all know what the company needs to do in the future including that ugly word advertising But.........

Thank you for your answer but if you could...
Please tell me why the company hasnt done damage control? To the recent articles- why no statement?


On Oct 07 10:43 AM dead elvis wrote:

> Sir Doom-
>
> Why do you think that the company has not issued statements to do
> damage control, and allowed a free for all with the media.?
>
> Now, they are smart ,they arent marters, somewhat defiant, but it
> is our company- not theirs
>
> Whats your honest take without all the obvious rhetoric.?

Sirius Can Avoid Bankruptcy

Sir Doom-

Why do you think that the company has not issued statements to do damage control, and allowed a free for all with the media.?

Now, they are smart ,they arent marters, somewhat defiant, but it is our company- not theirs

Whats your honest take without all the obvious rhetoric.?