6 Dividend Stocks for Current Income [View article]
Although I do agree with the comment that an EFT does hold a large selection of stocks thus mitigating specific risk, I have to comment that EFTs also are not so well healed as many might think. The comment was made that PFM holds 282 companies. Yes, but they do not hold them in equal proportions. Their largest holding is GE at 4.7% of assets. I will not comment on whether or not GE is a good company to hold, but I would not wish to hold it. Ten companies account for about 44% of their assets. The top 25 account for 67% of their holdings. The bottom 100 holdings account for less than 2% of their assets. This is not particularly my idea of having a sound dividend investment strategy. If I am going to hold 44% of my assets in 10 companies, I would rather be the one choosing those 10 companies rather than some computer somewhere based on some screw ball algorithm dreamed up by some screw ball on Wall Street.
Bank of America's Gain Is Taxpayers' Loss [View article]
Just another case of a gullible inept government. Geez, what's the big deal. They have always been so and will continue to always be so. BAC probably promised someone some fat campaign contributions in return.
Gold Is Still the Opportunity of a Lifetime [View article]
We perhaps loose track of why gold is in fact doing so well. It seems to me it is because people are loosing confidence in the government. People who have a few dollars and there are not all that many these days are exchanging them for gold while they still are able to. Too bad world governments are so inept.
Some Graham and Dodd Type Thoughts on Stocks vs. Bonds [View article]
There is a difference that you neglected to mention. That is the tax treatment of stocks vs bonds. With the preferred tax treatment of capital gains and currently dividends too, the in your pocket returns of stocks are greater than bonds.
Unwise to Tax the Rich to Pay for Health Care [View article]
Well heck, if you are going to raise taxes it seems logical that the place to raise them is on those that have the money to pay them. I remember back when the economy was really growing back in the 50s. Back then the marginal tax rate on the rich was about 90%. I wonder if there is some correlation there somewhere.
Sort by:
Latest | Highest rated6 Dividend Stocks for Current Income [View article]
How Washington's Policymakers Are Damaging the U.S. Economy [View article]
Should You Invest in Banking Stocks? [View article]
Why anyone would buy either of those worthless piles of crap is beyond me.
Bank of America's Gain Is Taxpayers' Loss [View article]
AIG Needs Dissolving [View article]
Yahoo: Can We Please Have Jerry Back? [View article]
How Low Can the Dollar Go? [View article]
Gold Is Still the Opportunity of a Lifetime [View article]
I have to go buy a few more ounces of gold now.
Sure It’s Legal … But Is It Right? [View article]
Colonial Bank Failure Highlights the Problem [View article]
Some Graham and Dodd Type Thoughts on Stocks vs. Bonds [View article]
Unwise to Tax the Rich to Pay for Health Care [View article]
The Fed Does See Those Green Shoots [View article]
The Dollar Is Doomed [View article]
90% AIG Tax Rate: Back to the 1950s [View article]