Why should a person who doesnt own a house pay to help another person have a house? Doesnt that sound ridiculous to anyone? The person who doesnt own a house will probably never own one if this bill is passed. Jerky Paulson and his pinko friends (that would be Pelosi, Reid, Frank, Dodd and Bush who is no prize neither at this point) are leading us down the wrong path.
Where could the money come from besides the taxpayers, lets think hmmm, I have a few suggestions.
We could stop (or at least cut back) on giving money to other countries who hate our guts.
We could ask other countries to pay us back.
Congress and The House could cut back on their jet set lives and special priviledges, for instance the guy I saw on tv who kept opening the door for them, they cant open their own door?
They could cut jobs in the senate and the house. There are too many people in the senate and house who never get anything done anyway.
They could ask our allies in the middle east to hook us up with oil since we're fighting their battles.
We could cap ceo bonuses and salaries. These people arent worth all that money anyway. Im sure some people in the company would agree while some are being paid not enough to make ends meet.
We could regulate wall st. better.
We could get the people who have diplomatic immunity who abused the system to pay up.
We could generate jobs in this country and export our products instead of mostly importing. It feels like products are mostly coming in.
We could get rid of people who dont belong here which cost us zillions in healthcare alone. Clean up crime at the same time.
These are just a few examples on how we could generate money to get out of this mess without taxing the rest of us who had nothing to do with this and from what I hear taxing babies that arent even born yet. Uncle Sam wants your child. Anyway these people who wrote the bill have ulterior motives. They keep saying how we need this urgently, maybe we do, and how we the taxpayers have to pay. I dont like that talk, they have to push something through fast. It sounds like bad news down the road to me.
Robin Hood in Reverse: In Defense of the U.S. Taxpayer [View article]
I dont like this one way street arrangement. Why should I have to help bail out these people who created this mess, got fithy rich in the process and gets a government guarantee. Thats not fair. If my business went under and I asked the government to bail me out, they'd tell me to go shit in a hat. I dont want to help these people.
So heres what I propose, since all these filthy rich people all know each other either directly or indirectly and somehow benefited from all this corruption, I think its only fair for these people (the ones that left the companies with millions after driving them into the ground and the politicians who had a hand in all this) bail each other out and leave the rest of us out of this. If we cant benefit on the upside I dont see why we all have to be punished. If these politicians were really for the average american they would punish the rich crooks who sucked the system dry. The bloodsuckers. If it were reversed and average people committed such a crime of this magnitude, the bloodsuckers would convict them in a week. Mostly for interrupting their cushy jet set lives. Its not right. Elitism is alive and well in this country and this people are well above the law.
If you trade stocks you dont want the uptick rule, if you invest which most people do and which means holding more times than not, you want the uptick rule.
AIG Must Not Fail! - Cramer's Stop Trading! (9/15/08) [View article]
I love the way these people pick and choose who they are going to bail out. Ihave a problem with the whole bail out thing. It seems like the Feds are being bullied by the market, I dont know about the bullying with AIG but definitely with the rates.
I like Cramer, I've liked him for the past 10 years. He and Scott Bleier were the only ones who looked out for the individual investor during the internet bubble. He has a hard job, he has to sit on a fence between the individual investor and the powers that be in this business. He says he dont care about making enemies in this business but he dont mean it. I believe his heart is in the right place he doesn't want to hurt people, people just need to learn Cramer lingo and learn to read between his lines and if people did their homework people would understand him better. For example, when he did catch up the week in april he was trying to tell people that goog which was behind the market since the year started and was going to soar after earnings. He does things like that alot and if you did your homework and know the stock market people would get it. As for him being a clown, yeah he gets clownish at times but thats just for entertainment purposes.
Grand Energy Debate Warms Up in Washington
[View article]
It's amazing that these people keep getting elected, it's even more amazing that people actually vote for them. Some people just vote with their eyes closed, like playing pin the tail on the donkey (no pun intended to the democrats) but seriously folks people should get more involved. There are a group of people in congress that over stayed their welcome and stick around for self serving reasons that seem sinister at best.
How Long Until Housing Prices Stabilize? [View article]
Comparing the stock market bubble to the housing bubble might be like comparing apples to oranges but when the stock market bubble bursted in March of 2000, I think it was Sept. of 2001, when the bottom hit, so about a year and a half. Double that for housing at the least but it's probably going to take longer.
Bucyrus Offers Potential for Sustainable Long-term Growth [View article]
Bucy is a swinger, it will go up a few days then down a few days, thats how it's been lately anyway. When the market is finished going down I think this does have potential for growth.
So, Do We Own Fannie and Freddie or Don't We? [View article]
Thats a good one Schweizer and a very scary FACT very scary. Thats the next stage in their plan for socialism getting people by the balls so we have to submit to their brain washing for lack of a better word.
Regarding to users post, the people in congress, politicians and the big shots who hang out with them have an eye for stocks and uncanny timing for when to get out. For instance, Gore buys google BOOM google flys, aapl, whom i'm pretty sure was on the board, BOOM almost 200 in Jan 08, Pelosi buys clne BOOM stock goes to 19 and of course Bernie, you know the guy Guiliani's pal the police chief, I dont remember his title, is on the board of taser the stock goes up tremendously it swings wildly for a while I hear he made millions leaves the board and then BOOM the stock practically crashes. Geez, I wish I had these people's eye and luck.
This isn't over by a long shot we may get temporarily relief but all this corruption(and doesn't it almost always boil down to corruption?) has to get flushed out of the system, theres no quick fix here, and what will we find when the smoke clears? capitalism shot to hell???
First off, I love the title of this article, .....Fannie and Freddie Heist its perfect. What these people are doing is absolutely wrong. Its bad enough that the American people are supporting the whole world now this. Not to mention the double standards, if small businesses go under its tough luck for me and you. We're going to break soon and socialism will be there to welcome us with open arms. The architects of socialism are working extra hard to impliment their plan faster than we thought.
If the market goes up from here it will probably go up a bit but if the market makes a new low, its goodbye charlie since it made 2 new lows in the last couple of weeks.
Sort by:
Latest | Highest ratedWhat is Hank Paulson Thinking? [View article]
Where could the money come from besides the taxpayers, lets think hmmm, I have a few suggestions.
We could stop (or at least cut back) on giving money to other countries who hate our guts.
We could ask other countries to pay us back.
Congress and The House could cut back on their jet set lives and special priviledges, for instance the guy I saw on tv who kept opening the door for them, they cant open their own door?
They could cut jobs in the senate and the house. There are too many people in the senate and house who never get anything done anyway.
They could ask our allies in the middle east to hook us up with oil since we're fighting their battles.
We could cap ceo bonuses and salaries. These people arent worth all that money anyway. Im sure some people in the company would agree while some are being paid not enough to make ends meet.
We could regulate wall st. better.
We could get the people who have diplomatic immunity who abused the system to pay up.
We could generate jobs in this country and export our products instead of mostly importing. It feels like products are mostly coming in.
We could get rid of people who dont belong here which cost us zillions in healthcare alone. Clean up crime at the same time.
These are just a few examples on how we could generate money to get out of this mess without taxing the rest of us who had nothing to do with this and from what I hear taxing babies that arent even born yet. Uncle Sam wants your child. Anyway these people who wrote the bill have ulterior motives. They keep saying how we need this urgently, maybe we do, and how we the taxpayers have to pay. I dont like that talk, they have to push something through fast. It sounds like bad news down the road to me.
Robin Hood in Reverse: In Defense of the U.S. Taxpayer [View article]
So heres what I propose, since all these filthy rich people all know each other either directly or indirectly and somehow benefited from all this corruption, I think its only fair for these people (the ones that left the companies with millions after driving them into the ground and the politicians who had a hand in all this) bail each other out and leave the rest of us out of this. If we cant benefit on the upside I dont see why we all have to be punished. If these politicians were really for the average american they would punish the rich crooks who sucked the system dry. The bloodsuckers. If it were reversed and average people committed such a crime of this magnitude, the bloodsuckers would convict them in a week. Mostly for interrupting their cushy jet set lives. Its not right. Elitism is alive and well in this country and this people are well above the law.
Greenspan On Current Meltdown: Interview with an Arsonist [View article]
Why It's Time to Buy Google, Apple [View article]
SEC to Address Naked Shorts [View article]
AIG Must Not Fail! - Cramer's Stop Trading! (9/15/08) [View article]
Going Down? Cramer's Lightning Round (9/15/08) [View article]
Grand Energy Debate Warms Up in Washington [View article]
How Long Until Housing Prices Stabilize? [View article]
Bucyrus Offers Potential for Sustainable Long-term Growth [View article]
So, Do We Own Fannie and Freddie or Don't We? [View article]
Regarding to users post, the people in congress, politicians and the big shots who hang out with them have an eye for stocks and uncanny timing for when to get out. For instance, Gore buys google BOOM google flys, aapl, whom i'm pretty sure was on the board, BOOM almost 200 in Jan 08, Pelosi buys clne BOOM stock goes to 19 and of course Bernie, you know the guy Guiliani's pal the police chief, I dont remember his title, is on the board of taser the stock goes up tremendously it swings wildly for a while I hear he made millions leaves the board and then BOOM the stock practically crashes. Geez, I wish I had these people's eye and luck.
When Can We Start Breathing Again? [View article]
Apple: Leading the Way to a Total Tech Breakdown [View article]
More on the Fannie/Freddie Heist [View article]
Not to mention the double standards, if small businesses go under its tough luck for me and you. We're going to break soon and socialism will be there to welcome us with open arms. The architects of socialism are working extra hard to impliment their plan faster than we thought.
Garmin: Navigating to Nowhere [View article]