<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Tricky's Comments</title>
    <description>Tricky's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/265323/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Tesla's Ambitious SuperCharger Infrastructure Build Is SuperExpensive</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1476221/comments?source=feed#comment-19548951</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19548951</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Hmm.  If all the above is correct, it appears that TSLA is pursuing a model of (analogy to ICE) owning a lot of the gas stations and using a technology that will only fill up their cars?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 09:00:26 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hmm.  If all the above is correct, it appears that TSLA is pursuing a model of (analogy to ICE) owning a lot of the gas stations and using a technology that will only fill up their cars?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tesla's First Red Flag</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1443191/comments?source=feed#comment-19161451</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19161451</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[LOL.  How fortunate we are to have objective sources such as Auto Dealer Insider and Detroit News, to help us with our decision making re: TSLA.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:21:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[LOL.  How fortunate we are to have objective sources such as Auto Dealer Insider and Detroit News, to help us with our decision making re: TSLA.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Refining Canada&amp;rsquo;s oil sands produces petroleum coke, called "the dirtiest residue from the dirtiest oil on earth." It's piling up along the Detroit River, NYT reports, thanks to a Marathon Petroleum refinery that began refining Canadian oil sands in November. Detroit&amp;rsquo;s pile will not be the only one. Canada&amp;rsquo;s efforts to sell more products from oil sands to the U.S., which include transporting it through the proposed Keystone pipeline, are pulling more coking south to U.S. refineries, creating more waste product.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1033921?source=feed#comment-18983581</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18983581</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The article actually addressed that very question.<br/><br/>Too bad the commenter didn't read the article before commenting on it.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 12:50:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The article actually addressed that very question.<br/><br/>Too bad the commenter didn't read the article before commenting on it.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Refining Canada&amp;rsquo;s oil sands produces petroleum coke, called "the dirtiest residue from the dirtiest oil on earth." It's piling up along the Detroit River, NYT reports, thanks to a Marathon Petroleum refinery that began refining Canadian oil sands in November. Detroit&amp;rsquo;s pile will not be the only one. Canada&amp;rsquo;s efforts to sell more products from oil sands to the U.S., which include transporting it through the proposed Keystone pipeline, are pulling more coking south to U.S. refineries, creating more waste product.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1033921?source=feed#comment-18983401</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18983401</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[One alternative is to read the article and find out for yourself.  The easier one is to just fling out a  knee-jerk rant.<br/><br/>I don't know enough about the topic to know how much their facts are skewed, incorrect or leave out important facts that don't support the angle that the article wants to push.<br/><br/>I'm not commenting on whether or not the article is biased -- it certainly does have a point of view that it is pushing.  I'm laughing at all the comments that were clearly made without reading the article, because the article did anticipate some of these knee jerk rants and presented some facts to counter them.<br/><br/>So I'm just finding the whole thing entertaining.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 12:44:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[One alternative is to read the article and find out for yourself.  The easier one is to just fling out a  knee-jerk rant.<br/><br/>I don't know enough about the topic to know how much their facts are skewed, incorrect or leave out important facts that don't support the angle that the article wants to push.<br/><br/>I'm not commenting on whether or not the article is biased -- it certainly does have a point of view that it is pushing.  I'm laughing at all the comments that were clearly made without reading the article, because the article did anticipate some of these knee jerk rants and presented some facts to counter them.<br/><br/>So I'm just finding the whole thing entertaining.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Refining Canada&amp;rsquo;s oil sands produces petroleum coke, called "the dirtiest residue from the dirtiest oil on earth." It's piling up along the Detroit River, NYT reports, thanks to a Marathon Petroleum refinery that began refining Canadian oil sands in November. Detroit&amp;rsquo;s pile will not be the only one. Canada&amp;rsquo;s efforts to sell more products from oil sands to the U.S., which include transporting it through the proposed Keystone pipeline, are pulling more coking south to U.S. refineries, creating more waste product.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1033921?source=feed#comment-18981421</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18981421</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[So... did anyone read the article before commenting?<br/><br/>&quot;Coke, which is mainly carbon, is an essential ingredient in steelmaking as well as producing the electrical anodes used to make aluminum.<br/><br/>While there is high demand from both those industries, the small grains and high sulfur content of this petroleum coke make it largely unusable for those purposes, said Kerry Satterthwaite, a petroleum coke analyst at Roskill Information Services, a commodities analysis company based in London.<br/><br/>“It is worse than a byproduct,” Ms. Satterthwaite said.“It’s a waste byproduct that is costly and inconvenient to store, but effectively costs nothing to produce.” ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 11:15:31 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[So... did anyone read the article before commenting?<br/><br/>&quot;Coke, which is mainly carbon, is an essential ingredient in steelmaking as well as producing the electrical anodes used to make aluminum.<br/><br/>While there is high demand from both those industries, the small grains and high sulfur content of this petroleum coke make it largely unusable for those purposes, said Kerry Satterthwaite, a petroleum coke analyst at Roskill Information Services, a commodities analysis company based in London.<br/><br/>“It is worse than a byproduct,” Ms. Satterthwaite said.“It’s a waste byproduct that is costly and inconvenient to store, but effectively costs nothing to produce.” ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tesla's First Red Flag</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1443191/comments?source=feed#comment-18969821</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18969821</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I'm happy for Tesla.  But they *do* need the cash.  Cheers.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 21:30:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I'm happy for Tesla.  But they *do* need the cash.  Cheers.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tesla's First Red Flag</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1443191/comments?source=feed#comment-18953191</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18953191</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[And there is now an addition of assets (cash from the sale) to be split amongst those shares.  So the numerator rose too... by an amount that equals (or betters) the market value of the pre-secondary shares.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 13:46:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[And there is now an addition of assets (cash from the sale) to be split amongst those shares.  So the numerator rose too... by an amount that equals (or betters) the market value of the pre-secondary shares.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How things can change in a week. Tesla Motors (TSLA) CEO Elon Musk's response during a conference call (transcript) on a question over a capital increase was pretty definitive that the automaker had spent "no time" on the concept and a secondary offering would only be to ensure against an "unexpected supply interruption" or "risk event."&amp;nbsp; To be fair, an exec being coy is nothing new and shares of Tesla were only in 3rd gear at the time - but the response is still intriguing. (h/t SA contributor George Kesarios)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1032061?source=feed#comment-18951681</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18951681</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[So what is your point?  Elon makes a statement when the stock is at a certain price.  About a week later, the stock has an incredible run up, that no one could have foreseen and is a godsend to a financially fragile startup.  TSLA takes advantage of this godsend and stabilizes the company.   But this makes them... what is your point... dishonest?<br/><br/>So would it make you feel better if TSLA didn't so the secondary?  To what end?  Have you ever run a company?  Why would you NOT take advantage of this unbelievable manna that just fell out of the sky?<br/><br/>This whole conversation is beyond silly.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 13:17:51 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[So what is your point?  Elon makes a statement when the stock is at a certain price.  About a week later, the stock has an incredible run up, that no one could have foreseen and is a godsend to a financially fragile startup.  TSLA takes advantage of this godsend and stabilizes the company.   But this makes them... what is your point... dishonest?<br/><br/>So would it make you feel better if TSLA didn't so the secondary?  To what end?  Have you ever run a company?  Why would you NOT take advantage of this unbelievable manna that just fell out of the sky?<br/><br/>This whole conversation is beyond silly.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tesla's First Red Flag</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1443191/comments?source=feed#comment-18941601</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18941601</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[George -- my reply is this... yes, it is something to be happy about for TSLA longs.  Reason = TSLA is an interesting beast with high volatility option characteristics on BOTH the downside and the upside.  This secondary placement lowers the probability of downside (e.g., bankruptcy) scenarios and gives them a little warchest for lots of things.  Short term hit, long term gain.<br/><br/>I was saying they should have done it after it made its first 25% up move, post conference call.  If anything, the move was a little bit overdue, IMHO.  Cheers.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 10:07:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[George -- my reply is this... yes, it is something to be happy about for TSLA longs.  Reason = TSLA is an interesting beast with high volatility option characteristics on BOTH the downside and the upside.  This secondary placement lowers the probability of downside (e.g., bankruptcy) scenarios and gives them a little warchest for lots of things.  Short term hit, long term gain.<br/><br/>I was saying they should have done it after it made its first 25% up move, post conference call.  If anything, the move was a little bit overdue, IMHO.  Cheers.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tesla's First Red Flag</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1443191/comments?source=feed#comment-18938351</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18938351</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Let's rephrase the question -- what would it say for TSLA management if they didn't capitalize on an unforeseen and a rare event in business history?<br/><br/>You're way too deep in some irrelevant weeds on this issue and missing the bigger picture.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 09:05:21 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Let's rephrase the question -- what would it say for TSLA management if they didn't capitalize on an unforeseen and a rare event in business history?<br/><br/>You're way too deep in some irrelevant weeds on this issue and missing the bigger picture.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How things can change in a week. Tesla Motors (TSLA) CEO Elon Musk's response during a conference call (transcript) on a question over a capital increase was pretty definitive that the automaker had spent "no time" on the concept and a secondary offering would only be to ensure against an "unexpected supply interruption" or "risk event."&amp;nbsp; To be fair, an exec being coy is nothing new and shares of Tesla were only in 3rd gear at the time - but the response is still intriguing. (h/t SA contributor George Kesarios)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1032061?source=feed#comment-18937841</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18937841</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[More seriously, this is a mountain out of a mole hill.  I doubt even Elon would have guessed what would happen to the stock after he made those statements.  And now the situation is dramatically different.  What just happened is extremely rare and a godsend to the company.  They would be stupid and irresponsible to not take advantage of the situation to stablize what is still a somewhat fragile financial position.  When the world changes, one must react to the new circumstances.<br/><br/>Nothing to see here people, move along.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 08:56:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[More seriously, this is a mountain out of a mole hill.  I doubt even Elon would have guessed what would happen to the stock after he made those statements.  And now the situation is dramatically different.  What just happened is extremely rare and a godsend to the company.  They would be stupid and irresponsible to not take advantage of the situation to stablize what is still a somewhat fragile financial position.  When the world changes, one must react to the new circumstances.<br/><br/>Nothing to see here people, move along.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How things can change in a week. Tesla Motors (TSLA) CEO Elon Musk's response during a conference call (transcript) on a question over a capital increase was pretty definitive that the automaker had spent "no time" on the concept and a secondary offering would only be to ensure against an "unexpected supply interruption" or "risk event."&amp;nbsp; To be fair, an exec being coy is nothing new and shares of Tesla were only in 3rd gear at the time - but the response is still intriguing. (h/t SA contributor George Kesarios)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1032061?source=feed#comment-18937561</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18937561</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[There *was* an unexpected supply interruption... in the availability of stock on loan for shorting    ;-)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 08:52:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[There *was* an unexpected supply interruption... in the availability of stock on loan for shorting    ;-)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More on Tesla: The company announces it's offering 2.7M shares (current value of $244M) and $450M in convertible debt due 2018 in a public offering. Elon Musk plans to buy $100M worth of shares - $45M through the offering, $55M through a private placement. Tesla expects $830M in gross proceeds. TSLA now +6.8% AH.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1028051?source=feed#comment-18937441</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18937441</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[My specific point was that TSLA doesn't need to aim to &quot;be Ford&quot; in order to *eventually* have a market cap as large as Ford's.  In the near term, they will aim to be more like BMW, with respect to product margins.  But I certainly get *your* larger point -- right now, BMW is 265x the volume and 4.7x the market cap of TSLA... so perhaps the objective summary statement of the situation might be &quot;TSLA longs appear to be willing to pay for that upside very far in advance of it materializing.&quot;  Cheers.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 08:49:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[My specific point was that TSLA doesn't need to aim to &quot;be Ford&quot; in order to *eventually* have a market cap as large as Ford's.  In the near term, they will aim to be more like BMW, with respect to product margins.  But I certainly get *your* larger point -- right now, BMW is 265x the volume and 4.7x the market cap of TSLA... so perhaps the objective summary statement of the situation might be &quot;TSLA longs appear to be willing to pay for that upside very far in advance of it materializing.&quot;  Cheers.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More on Tesla: The company announces it's offering 2.7M shares (current value of $244M) and $450M in convertible debt due 2018 in a public offering. Elon Musk plans to buy $100M worth of shares - $45M through the offering, $55M through a private placement. Tesla expects $830M in gross proceeds. TSLA now +6.8% AH.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1028051?source=feed#comment-18925991</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18925991</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The better point of comparison is BMW.  Right now, says Yahoo Finance, the market values of F, BMW and TSLA are 58b, 47b and 10b respectively.  So BMW is in &quot;shooting distance&quot; of Ford with a target market that is closer to TSLA... or perhaps more accurately, where TSLA will be aiming for the near term.<br/><br/>Future execution issues aside, of course.  My point is that TSLA doesn't need to sell econoboxes to &quot;deserve&quot; a market cap on par with F.  Cheers.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 21:36:31 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The better point of comparison is BMW.  Right now, says Yahoo Finance, the market values of F, BMW and TSLA are 58b, 47b and 10b respectively.  So BMW is in &quot;shooting distance&quot; of Ford with a target market that is closer to TSLA... or perhaps more accurately, where TSLA will be aiming for the near term.<br/><br/>Future execution issues aside, of course.  My point is that TSLA doesn't need to sell econoboxes to &quot;deserve&quot; a market cap on par with F.  Cheers.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More on Tesla: The company announces it's offering 2.7M shares (current value of $244M) and $450M in convertible debt due 2018 in a public offering. Elon Musk plans to buy $100M worth of shares - $45M through the offering, $55M through a private placement. Tesla expects $830M in gross proceeds. TSLA now +6.8% AH.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1028051?source=feed#comment-18897941</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18897941</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Another way to think about why a secondary raise would (counter to the typical reaction) be cheered by TSLA longs.  Think of TSLA, pre secondary, as having a strong volatility component (both upside and downside), in terms of &quot;company could become a corporate titan&quot; or &quot;could crash and burn&quot;.  The secondary raise reduces the probability of the downside scenario, while increasing the probability of the upside scenario.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 11:01:47 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Another way to think about why a secondary raise would (counter to the typical reaction) be cheered by TSLA longs.  Think of TSLA, pre secondary, as having a strong volatility component (both upside and downside), in terms of &quot;company could become a corporate titan&quot; or &quot;could crash and burn&quot;.  The secondary raise reduces the probability of the downside scenario, while increasing the probability of the upside scenario.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More on Tesla: The company announces it's offering 2.7M shares (current value of $244M) and $450M in convertible debt due 2018 in a public offering. Elon Musk plans to buy $100M worth of shares - $45M through the offering, $55M through a private placement. Tesla expects $830M in gross proceeds. TSLA now +6.8% AH.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1028051?source=feed#comment-18870931</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18870931</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Disagree about the credibility issue.  The runup since that statement has been unreal, something that rarely comes along.  It would be downright stupid and irresponsible of TSLA management to *not* take advantage of it and raise more capital.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 18:04:41 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Disagree about the credibility issue.  The runup since that statement has been unreal, something that rarely comes along.  It would be downright stupid and irresponsible of TSLA management to *not* take advantage of it and raise more capital.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tesla Motors (TSLA -0.4%) trades level with a tease from Elon Musk that an announcement is coming this week (Supercharger network next week) adding just a whiff of concern a secondary offering could be teed up. Also affecting sentiment, Deutsche Bank reiterates its Hold rating and raises its price target to $50, but considering the Tesla rally was missed by the investment firm and the new PT implies a 40% drop in share price, that may be one research note for File 13.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1026801?source=feed#comment-18866391</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18866391</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Hi Samuel, I won't gloat  ;-)   because they probably did not intend to raise capital at that time, but that was obviously prior to this incredible run-up... they simply couldn't pass up the godsend opportunity.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 16:26:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hi Samuel, I won't gloat  ;-)   because they probably did not intend to raise capital at that time, but that was obviously prior to this incredible run-up... they simply couldn't pass up the godsend opportunity.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tesla Motors (TSLA -0.4%) trades level with a tease from Elon Musk that an announcement is coming this week (Supercharger network next week) adding just a whiff of concern a secondary offering could be teed up. Also affecting sentiment, Deutsche Bank reiterates its Hold rating and raises its price target to $50, but considering the Tesla rally was missed by the investment firm and the new PT implies a 40% drop in share price, that may be one research note for File 13.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1026801?source=feed#comment-18866331</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18866331</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;TSLA files mixed shelf&quot;.  Tricky = prophet, heh   ;-)<br/><br/>Very good move for the company]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 16:25:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;TSLA files mixed shelf&quot;.  Tricky = prophet, heh   ;-)<br/><br/>Very good move for the company]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Don't look now but the hedgies are betting on Fannie FNMA.OB +6.6% and Freddie FMCC.OB +7%. WSJ says Paulson &amp;amp; Co. and Perry Capital (among others) are buying preferred shares on the off-chance Washington has a change of heart and decides to recapitalize the companies and sell taxpayers' stake on the open market. With the White House overwhelmingly in favor of winding down the two entities, anyone betting on profiting from a potential recap is "placing a political bet &amp;hellip; that faces unimaginably long odds," former White House adviser Jim Parrott tells the Journal.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1026531?source=feed#comment-18854781</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18854781</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Agree that dynamic is not to be underestimated.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 12:36:23 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Agree that dynamic is not to be underestimated.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tesla Motors (TSLA -0.4%) trades level with a tease from Elon Musk that an announcement is coming this week (Supercharger network next week) adding just a whiff of concern a secondary offering could be teed up. Also affecting sentiment, Deutsche Bank reiterates its Hold rating and raises its price target to $50, but considering the Tesla rally was missed by the investment firm and the new PT implies a 40% drop in share price, that may be one research note for File 13.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1026801?source=feed#comment-18854601</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18854601</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[A secondary offering may not be enjoyable for TSLA longs in the short term, but I think it makes a lot of sense for the company to take advantage of the run-up and bolster the balance sheet and war chest, would be a good move for long-term health and being able to invest in a few crucial areas.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 12:33:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[A secondary offering may not be enjoyable for TSLA longs in the short term, but I think it makes a lot of sense for the company to take advantage of the run-up and bolster the balance sheet and war chest, would be a good move for long-term health and being able to invest in a few crucial areas.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tesla Motors (TSLA): Q1 EPS of $0.12 beats by $0.08. Revenue of $562M (+16% Y/Y) beats by $63M. Conference call scheduled for 5:30 PM EST. Shares +8.1% AH to $60.33. (PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1010891?source=feed#comment-18597271</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18597271</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Tesla is one of the Obama administration's and Dept of Energy's poster kids (and quite possibly heading toward &quot;shining stars&quot;).  Why would they want it to fail?  They'll at least want the loan paid back to DoE first.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 17:12:19 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Tesla is one of the Obama administration's and Dept of Energy's poster kids (and quite possibly heading toward &quot;shining stars&quot;).  Why would they want it to fail?  They'll at least want the loan paid back to DoE first.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sirius XM Reaches $3.39; Time To Take Profits?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1392761/comments?source=feed#comment-18354511</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18354511</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@gardmi -- howdy.  I'm not saying AAPL or GOOG *would* buy SIRI, but as far as &quot;why&quot; they might -- you are certainly correct that those two are already established on the devices mentioned.  But this would be an opportunity to: 1) establish themselves in the lead position for &quot;the connected car&quot; platform, which is one of the next big battlegrounds and still up for grabs IMHO, and 2) exclusive content -- of value to AAPL to cement the strength of iTunes, of value to GOOG to attack that strength and get a much better foothold in content<br/><br/>But that all supposes LMCA is even willing to sell -- they'll push a hard bargain.<br/><br/>In any event, it's all fun to watch.<br/>Cheers.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 10:21:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@gardmi -- howdy.  I'm not saying AAPL or GOOG *would* buy SIRI, but as far as &quot;why&quot; they might -- you are certainly correct that those two are already established on the devices mentioned.  But this would be an opportunity to: 1) establish themselves in the lead position for &quot;the connected car&quot; platform, which is one of the next big battlegrounds and still up for grabs IMHO, and 2) exclusive content -- of value to AAPL to cement the strength of iTunes, of value to GOOG to attack that strength and get a much better foothold in content<br/><br/>But that all supposes LMCA is even willing to sell -- they'll push a hard bargain.<br/><br/>In any event, it's all fun to watch.<br/>Cheers.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"There are less ways to cheat on a balance sheet than an income statement," says Bruce Berkowitz, explaining why he focuses on the one rather than the other (and why he'll probably never be a buyer of auto stocks). In this great 35-minute chat from late last year, he again makes his case for AIG and BAC - "it's the 90s all over again" - and SHLD - selling for the liquidation value of its merchandise; the brands and the real estate are free.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/976391?source=feed#comment-18188571</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18188571</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I too found it a bit odd that someone who says it's harder to cheat on balance sheets likes a sector (fin services) where it's easiest to do so?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 10:18:44 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I too found it a bit odd that someone who says it's harder to cheat on balance sheets likes a sector (fin services) where it's easiest to do so?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How And Why Zero Interest Rates Ended Last Time</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1363091/comments?source=feed#comment-18010451</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18010451</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Exactly my question -- this should definitely have been an Editor's Pick.  An analytical tour de force.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:45:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Exactly my question -- this should definitely have been an Editor's Pick.  An analytical tour de force.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The fertilizer plant explosion in Texas could prove a long-term benefit to some companies in the sector, since it could slow the building up of new nitrogen fertilizer capacity in the U.S. and provide a competitive boost to entrenched producers such as CF&amp;nbsp;Industries (CF +3%), Potash (POT +0.8%) and Agrium (AGU +1.1%), Citigroup says.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/952681?source=feed#comment-17810391</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17810391</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I'm long POT but this certainly isn't the way I like it to increase in price   :-(]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 18:24:19 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I'm long POT but this certainly isn't the way I like it to increase in price   :-(]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Regulators are investigating whether "a benchmark daily rate set by a group of banks" has been the subject of widespread manipulation. Sound familiar? The CFTC has issued multiple subpoenas in connection with its investigation into the possible manipulation of ISDAFIX, the rate referenced by $379T (that's "trillion") of interest-rate swaps which are used by "everyone from hedge funds to manufacturing companies &amp;hellip; to protect against fluctuations in funding costs."&amp;nbsp;</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/932111?source=feed#comment-17381781</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17381781</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[With a name like ISDAFIX, I mean, what did you expect?   ;-)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 21:31:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[With a name like ISDAFIX, I mean, what did you expect?   ;-)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The "widespread impression" is that "Texas is corrupt, callous, racist, theocratic, stupid, belligerent, and most of all, dangerous," writes Erica Greider in a new book. Greider sets out to counter this perception and explain why America should learn from the Lone Star State. The economy is thriving, helped by weak government, strict lending laws, Nafta, mass immigration and generous business incentives, not to mention lots of oil.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/929491?source=feed#comment-17330311</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17330311</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[No doubt, TX benefits whenever hydrocarbon revenues soar.  But TX is a lot more economically diverse than the 80's, when it lived and died on swings in crude prices.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 18:07:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[No doubt, TX benefits whenever hydrocarbon revenues soar.  But TX is a lot more economically diverse than the 80's, when it lived and died on swings in crude prices.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>With their healthcare costs ballooning, many companies have started to penalize fat employees with regards to healthcare coverage, raising all sorts of legal, privacy and discrimination questions. Michelin North America, for example, plans to cut healthcare credits for staff who fail to meet requirement for waistline and other metrics, and don't sign up to health programs. Other companies making similar moves include Mohawk (MHK), CVS and Honeywell (HON).</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/929481?source=feed#comment-17329781</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17329781</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@Agbug -- ha!  Good thing you did, I'm very litigious in protecting my trademarked catchphrases  ;-)<br/><br/>@ Geoff -- hmm.  McDonalds vs. Soylent Green.  Hmm.  Ethical issues aside, I'm not sure which meal would taste nastier (I'll make an exception for Egg McMuffins but everything else at McD's is disgusting... well, fries are okay too).]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 17:30:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@Agbug -- ha!  Good thing you did, I'm very litigious in protecting my trademarked catchphrases  ;-)<br/><br/>@ Geoff -- hmm.  McDonalds vs. Soylent Green.  Hmm.  Ethical issues aside, I'm not sure which meal would taste nastier (I'll make an exception for Egg McMuffins but everything else at McD's is disgusting... well, fries are okay too).]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>With their healthcare costs ballooning, many companies have started to penalize fat employees with regards to healthcare coverage, raising all sorts of legal, privacy and discrimination questions. Michelin North America, for example, plans to cut healthcare credits for staff who fail to meet requirement for waistline and other metrics, and don't sign up to health programs. Other companies making similar moves include Mohawk (MHK), CVS and Honeywell (HON).</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/929481?source=feed#comment-17321261</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17321261</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I'm that guy  ;-)<br/><br/>Time to fire up the soylent green program!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 11:33:51 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I'm that guy  ;-)<br/><br/>Time to fire up the soylent green program!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The "widespread impression" is that "Texas is corrupt, callous, racist, theocratic, stupid, belligerent, and most of all, dangerous," writes Erica Greider in a new book. Greider sets out to counter this perception and explain why America should learn from the Lone Star State. The economy is thriving, helped by weak government, strict lending laws, Nafta, mass immigration and generous business incentives, not to mention lots of oil.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/929491?source=feed#comment-17321211</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17321211</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I live in TX and have lived outside of it.  Like any other place on earth, it's a mixed bag.<br/><br/>Pros -- cheap, can-do, pro-business, hot women ;-)<br/><br/>Cons -- anti-science Christian fundamentalists nuts have taken over the school system.  Any politician that's been in office for a long time (D or R) becomes corrupt and the Perry administration is no exception.  Weather generally sucks.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 11:32:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I live in TX and have lived outside of it.  Like any other place on earth, it's a mixed bag.<br/><br/>Pros -- cheap, can-do, pro-business, hot women ;-)<br/><br/>Cons -- anti-science Christian fundamentalists nuts have taken over the school system.  Any politician that's been in office for a long time (D or R) becomes corrupt and the Perry administration is no exception.  Weather generally sucks.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
