Tricky

'Speculators' Are Starting to Avoid Companies with Legacy Costs

^ exactly. They won't need financing from the private sector, they'll get all they want from the government

GM's Bondholder Pillaging Plan

I'm generally a fan Tyler, but I have to agree with this comment


On Apr 27 12:41 PM User 402966 wrote:

> Why does the US taxpayer have any responsibility to the GM bondholder?
> The outrage here is NOT the "pillaging" of the bondholder - it is
> the use of taxpayer money to bail them out. A viable GM can emerge
> from bankrupcy even if current bondholders are wiped out.
>
> DL

Buyer Beware: 30 Biggest Bankruptcy Risks

I am incredulous that someone would question whether authors should post negative news. Part of being an investor or trader is knowing what not to get into, what to get out of, what to short. What are you recommending as the alternative -- to hide news that could bite the investor later?

Unbelievable. I've seen some stupid comments on SA before, but those really have to be the worst.

If there is valid criticism about the motives or methology of an article, by all means, that's fair game to call them out. But to say "bad news should not be stated" is... unreal.