<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Moon Kil Woong's Comments</title>
    <description>Moon Kil Woong's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/265539/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Oncothyreon A Speculative Buy</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1444841/comments?source=feed#comment-18971131</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18971131</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Actually, given the looseness of news leaks these days, I figure that perhaps someone knows some aspect of the study isn't going well. I'd avoid until the next batch of results is released.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:37:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Actually, given the looseness of news leaks these days, I figure that perhaps someone knows some aspect of the study isn't going well. I'd avoid until the next batch of results is released.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Confidence Boom?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1444801/comments?source=feed#comment-18971001</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18971001</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[This sentiment is usually in response to the stock market not a response to actual economic improvement. This may in fact be illusionary.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:32:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[This sentiment is usually in response to the stock market not a response to actual economic improvement. This may in fact be illusionary.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gold miners (GDX -3.2%) take another beating as gold continues to lose its allure amid disclosures of reduced bets by hedge funds, a World Gold Council report showing gold demand at a three-year low, and a surging dollar. For the miners, it's an ugly world of lower production, higher costs and falling prices. At least nine miners hit 52-week lows: NEM -3%, GG -2.7%, AUY -4.8%, HMY -6.3%, AU -2.5%, BVN -1.1%, ANV -7.4%, NG -2.7%, GSS -5.8%.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1033421?source=feed#comment-18970871</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18970871</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The Federal Reserve can create deflation just as easily as they did with the great depression if their investment in QE starts to go stale from higher interest rates. Given QE they can make a depression much worse than the great depression now that they truly do control money supply with no restraints at all. We are all foolish to let Congress give away our rights to control money supply. Without a fair method of creating and distributing money supply (or at least democratic) we can not call this monetary system capitalism at all.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:26:46 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The Federal Reserve can create deflation just as easily as they did with the great depression if their investment in QE starts to go stale from higher interest rates. Given QE they can make a depression much worse than the great depression now that they truly do control money supply with no restraints at all. We are all foolish to let Congress give away our rights to control money supply. Without a fair method of creating and distributing money supply (or at least democratic) we can not call this monetary system capitalism at all.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Most Misleading Words In Investing: You Can't Go Broke Taking A Profit</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1444861/comments?source=feed#comment-18970311</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18970311</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I agree that selling your winners and keeping your losers will eventually leave you with nothing but a bunch of poorly performing or straight out loser stocks.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 21:56:58 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I agree that selling your winners and keeping your losers will eventually leave you with nothing but a bunch of poorly performing or straight out loser stocks.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>It's Official: Gold Is Now The Most Hated Asset Class</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1444851/comments?source=feed#comment-18970181</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18970181</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It is interesting, the growth in paper gold and gold in the last decade exceeds the growth in money supply. The fall of gold due to a glut of paper backed by nothing is not a surprise, in fact it is largely inevitable and I'm sure the ones writing it were counting on it since they obviously had no intention of ever fulfilling even a large fraction of the paper contracts with real gold (their simply isn't enough of it in the world).]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 21:51:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It is interesting, the growth in paper gold and gold in the last decade exceeds the growth in money supply. The fall of gold due to a glut of paper backed by nothing is not a surprise, in fact it is largely inevitable and I'm sure the ones writing it were counting on it since they obviously had no intention of ever fulfilling even a large fraction of the paper contracts with real gold (their simply isn't enough of it in the world).]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Advanced Micro Devices: Is Goldman Sachs Right?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1442881/comments?source=feed#comment-18967771</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18967771</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Certainly if GS wants to downgrade AMD they should downgrade Intel as well if not the whole segment. I don't find their single targeting plausible, however if AMD goes down in a cyclical downturn they are likely to tout how right they are even if they are wrong still recommending the rest of the semi equipment sector. I would call this selective hedging so they can't be too wrong no matter how this segment goes (plus it does a lot for kissing up to Intel).]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 19:30:12 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Certainly if GS wants to downgrade AMD they should downgrade Intel as well if not the whole segment. I don't find their single targeting plausible, however if AMD goes down in a cyclical downturn they are likely to tout how right they are even if they are wrong still recommending the rest of the semi equipment sector. I would call this selective hedging so they can't be too wrong no matter how this segment goes (plus it does a lot for kissing up to Intel).]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Applied Materials' CEO Discusses F2Q 2013 Results - Earnings Call Transcript</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1442021/comments?source=feed#comment-18924881</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18924881</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I believe it's very wrong to buy semi equipment at this point of time given a semi downturn is all but inevitable. Coupled with weak PC sales and no new revolutionary developments in networking or handsets, the downturn looks to be a nasty one when it comes.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 21:03:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I believe it's very wrong to buy semi equipment at this point of time given a semi downturn is all but inevitable. Coupled with weak PC sales and no new revolutionary developments in networking or handsets, the downturn looks to be a nasty one when it comes.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Zynga: A Safer Bet Now?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1438921/comments?source=feed#comment-18885121</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18885121</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Cash is not Zynga's problem, their risk is they become irrelevant in the market and lose their faddishness as fast as Facebook is. Simply put, the old social media is dying due to their faddishness. Remember Friendster? Remember Myspace? Facebook may share their fate and along with it those who spawned from them such as Zynga. Sure Zynga has moved away from them but the rotting smell is still attached to them, esp since Facebook spams their customers and asks them to play games incessantly.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 02:51:39 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Cash is not Zynga's problem, their risk is they become irrelevant in the market and lose their faddishness as fast as Facebook is. Simply put, the old social media is dying due to their faddishness. Remember Friendster? Remember Myspace? Facebook may share their fate and along with it those who spawned from them such as Zynga. Sure Zynga has moved away from them but the rotting smell is still attached to them, esp since Facebook spams their customers and asks them to play games incessantly.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco After Earnings: The Good, The Bad And The Ugly</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1439051/comments?source=feed#comment-18884561</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18884561</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[There has been nothing new or exciting at Cisco for years even though cloud computing and SaaS has been on a tear. Stability is good but sooner or later, without much change their lunch and margins will be eaten by Asian and domestic competitors selling at more affordable prices. I don't know anyone who has bought Cisco for years now. Simply put, they are overpriced with no technology to justify the price anymore. <br/><br/>This helps fund keeping some of the most expensive real estate in the US to house even their most basic functions. As I mentioned years ago when they started doing bad, all I see is waste and more waste crossed with bad management that never changes. Entrenched management is the worst.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 02:09:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[There has been nothing new or exciting at Cisco for years even though cloud computing and SaaS has been on a tear. Stability is good but sooner or later, without much change their lunch and margins will be eaten by Asian and domestic competitors selling at more affordable prices. I don't know anyone who has bought Cisco for years now. Simply put, they are overpriced with no technology to justify the price anymore. <br/><br/>This helps fund keeping some of the most expensive real estate in the US to house even their most basic functions. As I mentioned years ago when they started doing bad, all I see is waste and more waste crossed with bad management that never changes. Entrenched management is the worst.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Vivus - Mild Drama Continues</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1436491/comments?source=feed#comment-18884451</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18884451</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Yawn another weight loss drug.... In the drug market partners are golden, especially when you haven't been in a market. Management is greedy and the ramp will be slow and arduous even if the stuff works. There simply are way too many alternatives in this market. It's all up to marketing hype.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 01:58:17 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Yawn another weight loss drug.... In the drug market partners are golden, especially when you haven't been in a market. Management is greedy and the ramp will be slow and arduous even if the stuff works. There simply are way too many alternatives in this market. It's all up to marketing hype.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gold (GLD -2.1%), (IAU -2.2%) sinks back below $1,400 as the bounce since mid-April is officially over. At work here, suggests RBC Capital, is the strong stock market. To participate, foreign investors sell gold, buy dollars (UUP is up big in May), and call their stockbrokers. Commerzbank notes gold ETF outflows were another 6 tons yesterday, bringing the total since early April to 230 tons. Silver (SLV -3.1%) tags along.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1026971?source=feed#comment-18880531</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18880531</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[We don't know where gold is heading because we don't know what the Fed now wants? Will they let the US slip into another recession or print loads more funny money to prop it up? The first may bode for weak commodities. The second will reflate commodities. The first will help the Federal Reserve keep its QE status and 0 interest policy that helps them and bankers. The second will help enrich bankers by the Federal Reserve buying up their bonds and giving them more free money to buy up more of the public's assets.<br/><br/>Another words, a QE will only help bankers no matter what is done. That's why QE = the country enters a nightmare of economic doom. Money is made without regards to economic fact and wealth is created for the select few without taking on risk or paying for it. However, worst of all, banks interest now run counter to the public good.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 23:03:43 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[We don't know where gold is heading because we don't know what the Fed now wants? Will they let the US slip into another recession or print loads more funny money to prop it up? The first may bode for weak commodities. The second will reflate commodities. The first will help the Federal Reserve keep its QE status and 0 interest policy that helps them and bankers. The second will help enrich bankers by the Federal Reserve buying up their bonds and giving them more free money to buy up more of the public's assets.<br/><br/>Another words, a QE will only help bankers no matter what is done. That's why QE = the country enters a nightmare of economic doom. Money is made without regards to economic fact and wealth is created for the select few without taking on risk or paying for it. However, worst of all, banks interest now run counter to the public good.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gold: Over-Leveraged Portfolios Unwinding, Watch Out Below</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1428201/comments?source=feed#comment-18747811</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18747811</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;Remember, it was gold and commodity ETFs beginning in early 2000 that were responsible for raising the price of gold near $2000, and it will be the unwinding of all these commodity funds that will bring gold down again.&quot; This is an unproven argument of cause and effect. It can be argued these were released due to the rise of gold not the cause of it.<br/><br/>Likewise the indication that these ETFs and ETNs will unwind is also a fallacy. The only way they are really unwound is by someone buying them and closing the position or by converting them to physical. In both cases this means there is a buyer and a seller or just someone converting. By doing either, it decreases the amount of paper gold and theoretical supply drops but not necessarily demand which may increase prices not decrease them. <br/><br/>Hedge funds getting out of a position tend to have a short term effect and lead to more stability not less in the future. I'd be a holder of gold if no hedge fund held gold anymore, not the inverse. <br/><br/>It's all about perspective. I personally disagree with the author's rendition of the effect of less fund managers loving paper gold. A argument there will be less paper gold is also shaky, because one of the main causes of April's gold drop was DB's choice to mint a whole slew more of silver and gold ETNs. As we can see, more paper gold makes the price drop, so cancellation of paper gold would usually have an inverse effect.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 23:19:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;Remember, it was gold and commodity ETFs beginning in early 2000 that were responsible for raising the price of gold near $2000, and it will be the unwinding of all these commodity funds that will bring gold down again.&quot; This is an unproven argument of cause and effect. It can be argued these were released due to the rise of gold not the cause of it.<br/><br/>Likewise the indication that these ETFs and ETNs will unwind is also a fallacy. The only way they are really unwound is by someone buying them and closing the position or by converting them to physical. In both cases this means there is a buyer and a seller or just someone converting. By doing either, it decreases the amount of paper gold and theoretical supply drops but not necessarily demand which may increase prices not decrease them. <br/><br/>Hedge funds getting out of a position tend to have a short term effect and lead to more stability not less in the future. I'd be a holder of gold if no hedge fund held gold anymore, not the inverse. <br/><br/>It's all about perspective. I personally disagree with the author's rendition of the effect of less fund managers loving paper gold. A argument there will be less paper gold is also shaky, because one of the main causes of April's gold drop was DB's choice to mint a whole slew more of silver and gold ETNs. As we can see, more paper gold makes the price drop, so cancellation of paper gold would usually have an inverse effect.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Much Is Apple's Cash Really Worth?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1427791/comments?source=feed#comment-18747631</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18747631</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Apple like so many other companies have no intention of ever bringing their cash back to the US and is one big reason why the money supply in the US keeps hemorrhaging so badly the federal Reserve decided just to buy bonds and print as much funny money as it can. Apple's move is just proof that they have no intention of doing so.<br/><br/>If anything the US should tax corporations on money going out of the country not coming in. Of course Apple may argue that they don't need domestic cash because all their costs are overseas which just adds to the point that many US multinational companies are employing more people overseas and using more of their money overseas than they use in the US. Rather than a benefit to the US they are somewhat of a drain on the economy as they rush to export as much cash from the US as they can.<br/><br/>Personally, I agree you should discount the value of foreign cash holdings by international corporations but that will never happen for the same reason as all derivatives contracts of a bank will never be disclosed. The system supports those that lobby and give money to politicians, not what is good for America.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 23:06:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Apple like so many other companies have no intention of ever bringing their cash back to the US and is one big reason why the money supply in the US keeps hemorrhaging so badly the federal Reserve decided just to buy bonds and print as much funny money as it can. Apple's move is just proof that they have no intention of doing so.<br/><br/>If anything the US should tax corporations on money going out of the country not coming in. Of course Apple may argue that they don't need domestic cash because all their costs are overseas which just adds to the point that many US multinational companies are employing more people overseas and using more of their money overseas than they use in the US. Rather than a benefit to the US they are somewhat of a drain on the economy as they rush to export as much cash from the US as they can.<br/><br/>Personally, I agree you should discount the value of foreign cash holdings by international corporations but that will never happen for the same reason as all derivatives contracts of a bank will never be disclosed. The system supports those that lobby and give money to politicians, not what is good for America.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>19 Things I Like About Dividends</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1146471/comments?source=feed#comment-18747391</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18747391</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I used to like bank dividends too but now they figured out they can keep your money without paying dividends as well as get money without interest from the Federal Reserve so then they can loan it out and pay themselves the handsome amount of money you used to make. That is why there is an increasing amount of people flocking to the stock market for the potential to make even the slightest returns without regard to risk.<br/><br/>The stock market ramp up is not due to a healthy market. It's due to capitulation that the economy and interest rates may never return a decent rate again thanks the Federal Reserve and QE.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 22:49:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I used to like bank dividends too but now they figured out they can keep your money without paying dividends as well as get money without interest from the Federal Reserve so then they can loan it out and pay themselves the handsome amount of money you used to make. That is why there is an increasing amount of people flocking to the stock market for the potential to make even the slightest returns without regard to risk.<br/><br/>The stock market ramp up is not due to a healthy market. It's due to capitulation that the economy and interest rates may never return a decent rate again thanks the Federal Reserve and QE.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Spyglass Resources: With A 15.5% Yield The Market Wrongly Expects Certain Failure</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1423691/comments?source=feed#comment-18726181</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18726181</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I fail to see how three indebted poorly performing entities can do much better, especially with a limited credit line and a large payout ratio. The dividends will evaporate as will the stock, esp. since N. America is swimming in too much natural gas exploration.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 02:51:31 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I fail to see how three indebted poorly performing entities can do much better, especially with a limited credit line and a large payout ratio. The dividends will evaporate as will the stock, esp. since N. America is swimming in too much natural gas exploration.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Has The Future Changed That Much For Tesla Motors?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1427331/comments?source=feed#comment-18726161</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18726161</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Tesla is going the right direction. It's just that the car market is not usually the place you want to put your money or bet on. Most likely, its only long term hope is to do badly and get bought out like so many other auto manufacturers before it. Add to it a constantly changing battery technology and this becomes just too unpredictable.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 02:48:03 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Tesla is going the right direction. It's just that the car market is not usually the place you want to put your money or bet on. Most likely, its only long term hope is to do badly and get bought out like so many other auto manufacturers before it. Add to it a constantly changing battery technology and this becomes just too unpredictable.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cellceutix Corporation: The Next Generation Of Cancer Treatment Has Arrived</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1422381/comments?source=feed#comment-18724981</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18724981</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you for really looking at the science. Actually the whole article is somewhat misfounded. Kevetrin is one of many Histone Deacetylase inhibitors which affect P21 and P53 probably through epigenetic pathways. Vornostat and Romidepsin are already approved and 19 are in preclinical to Phase III with the FDA. <br/><br/>Other HDACs are trichostatin A, Trapoxin B, Benzamides, Valproic Acid, and phenylbutyrate all which bind to the zinc containing catalytic domain of HDAC. <br/><br/>This is certainly a field that is under heavy study and Kevetrin is the most recent and arguably the furthest behind in clinical trials being it is the oly one in Preclinical. There is no doubt affecting HDAC can have a positive impact on cancers. The big issue will be its safety, efficacy, and if it is markedly better than what is already approved. That will be a high hurdle to clear as more get approved in front of Kevetrin.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 00:38:25 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you for really looking at the science. Actually the whole article is somewhat misfounded. Kevetrin is one of many Histone Deacetylase inhibitors which affect P21 and P53 probably through epigenetic pathways. Vornostat and Romidepsin are already approved and 19 are in preclinical to Phase III with the FDA. <br/><br/>Other HDACs are trichostatin A, Trapoxin B, Benzamides, Valproic Acid, and phenylbutyrate all which bind to the zinc containing catalytic domain of HDAC. <br/><br/>This is certainly a field that is under heavy study and Kevetrin is the most recent and arguably the furthest behind in clinical trials being it is the oly one in Preclinical. There is no doubt affecting HDAC can have a positive impact on cancers. The big issue will be its safety, efficacy, and if it is markedly better than what is already approved. That will be a high hurdle to clear as more get approved in front of Kevetrin.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>On the surface, today's selloff in gold has all the earmarks of a dollar-related move. After all, the Dollar Index has risen nearly 2% over the past two days. Couple that with the standard Friday jitters, its only natural for support levels to be breached today. However, Oppenheimer's chief market technician Carter Worth says today's action all part of a bigger technical move. "A multi-year bull market has transitioned to a bear market," Worth says, and "the backing and filling of late is the normal setup for the next leg down."</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1019801?source=feed#comment-18723821</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18723821</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I honestly don't know how much more paper gold mostly un-backed by the physical thing the market can handle. Demand for it is waning because there is tons of supply even as gold reserves themselves are being tapped. I guess banks don't really care about getting ruined by not being able to cover their ETF and ETNs with real gold. That may be because they have the blessing of the Fed or they figure if it goes to the moon they simply will declare a state of economic crisis and make the public bail them out again. <br/><br/>The simple fact is... no one in the world could supply as much gold as their is paper written for it. That means banks and others are hoping to buy it back and close the position without delivery making them the big shorters and issuing the paper against their clients much like Goldman Sacs did with home mortgage bonds.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 23:04:06 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I honestly don't know how much more paper gold mostly un-backed by the physical thing the market can handle. Demand for it is waning because there is tons of supply even as gold reserves themselves are being tapped. I guess banks don't really care about getting ruined by not being able to cover their ETF and ETNs with real gold. That may be because they have the blessing of the Fed or they figure if it goes to the moon they simply will declare a state of economic crisis and make the public bail them out again. <br/><br/>The simple fact is... no one in the world could supply as much gold as their is paper written for it. That means banks and others are hoping to buy it back and close the position without delivery making them the big shorters and issuing the paper against their clients much like Goldman Sacs did with home mortgage bonds.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intel: Haswell Release On June 3rd Could Be Huge</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1383261/comments?source=feed#comment-18723741</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18723741</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The tablet and handset market are about to get bloody fast. Intel is only now coming out with competitive product right when the margins will be sapped out of the market. The undoubtedly will do a typical Intel and dump into the market, so don't expect anyone's income statement to look wonderful in the coming few years on the sub-pc arena.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 22:59:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The tablet and handset market are about to get bloody fast. Intel is only now coming out with competitive product right when the margins will be sapped out of the market. The undoubtedly will do a typical Intel and dump into the market, so don't expect anyone's income statement to look wonderful in the coming few years on the sub-pc arena.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is This The Market Top? How To Best Position For A Sell-Off</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1412791/comments?source=feed#comment-18611131</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18611131</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It is very hard for most people to be market short. But taking some short positions as a hedge is not a bad policy anytime besides a market bottom (When most want to hedge. Funny how that is). ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 01:59:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It is very hard for most people to be market short. But taking some short positions as a hedge is not a bad policy anytime besides a market bottom (When most want to hedge. Funny how that is). ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lessons From Earnings Season And The Dog That Did Not Bark</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1417321/comments?source=feed#comment-18611121</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18611121</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The market is being propped up by people having nowhere else to get a decent return on their money and even some is now slopping into real estate again. That is a sign that the Feds low interest QE policy is working. Gamble, gamble with your money to get poor returns and then loose on the next downside which is most likely very near.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 01:57:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The market is being propped up by people having nowhere else to get a decent return on their money and even some is now slopping into real estate again. That is a sign that the Feds low interest QE policy is working. Gamble, gamble with your money to get poor returns and then loose on the next downside which is most likely very near.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The End Of The Consumer? What The Long-Term Decline Of Consumption Means For Investors</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1416211/comments?source=feed#comment-18609491</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18609491</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It is natural that stocks that offer dividends or grow consistently increase in value as bond rates drop due to artificial means by the Federal Reserve. Given the low rates even weak stocks look good in terms of generating income as interest rates get floored. There is a giant transfer of wealth going from those who have assets and now can't generate interest and income to those who print money and give it out to themselves at zero interest and charge miniscule rates for the free money they get (the Federal Reserve and their TBTF bank cronies that run it).<br/><br/>Americans need to see the farce for what it is. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 00:04:18 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It is natural that stocks that offer dividends or grow consistently increase in value as bond rates drop due to artificial means by the Federal Reserve. Given the low rates even weak stocks look good in terms of generating income as interest rates get floored. There is a giant transfer of wealth going from those who have assets and now can't generate interest and income to those who print money and give it out to themselves at zero interest and charge miniscule rates for the free money they get (the Federal Reserve and their TBTF bank cronies that run it).<br/><br/>Americans need to see the farce for what it is. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Threats To The AT&amp;T And Verizon Duopoly</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1413641/comments?source=feed#comment-18604091</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18604091</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[In the end there is no reason to have a &quot;phone&quot; at all. Internet voice is much easier than half the image based junk you get on your phone already. WiFi providers should roll out en mass and make carriers obsolete. <br/><br/>I opined for WiMax but in the end the market downturn destroyed the fledgling concept of low cost publically provided WiMax throughout the nation.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 20:43:13 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[In the end there is no reason to have a &quot;phone&quot; at all. Internet voice is much easier than half the image based junk you get on your phone already. WiFi providers should roll out en mass and make carriers obsolete. <br/><br/>I opined for WiMax but in the end the market downturn destroyed the fledgling concept of low cost publically provided WiMax throughout the nation.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Molycorp Earnings Preview: What To Look For</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1411421/comments?source=feed#comment-18580471</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18580471</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[On top of that that is just the ore which is RE oxides along with other stuff (and that's just estimated). Do you know how many tons of earth must be moved to reach the given ore... tons more. <br/><br/>As for China, Molycorp has operations there too and buys ore from Russia and still can't meet its production target. It also has been fined for leaking wastewater into the ground already.<br/><br/>Sadly Molycorp does not disclose the total tonnage of earth and ore mined to get its production and it is strange that they mix production in with Chinese and Russian ore so you can't tell exactly what grade or content their own mining produces alone. Also all their percent of RE in their mined material is estimates no actual figures even though they've been operating for quite a while. If it was a gold silver or copper mining company they would have been sued by now (they have been by the way). <br/><br/>I'm still waiting for the facts. But generally speaking you get a few ounces of good sellable purified RE product per ton of earth mined. I'm waiting for Moly to show its tons of earth to RE production.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 11:40:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[On top of that that is just the ore which is RE oxides along with other stuff (and that's just estimated). Do you know how many tons of earth must be moved to reach the given ore... tons more. <br/><br/>As for China, Molycorp has operations there too and buys ore from Russia and still can't meet its production target. It also has been fined for leaking wastewater into the ground already.<br/><br/>Sadly Molycorp does not disclose the total tonnage of earth and ore mined to get its production and it is strange that they mix production in with Chinese and Russian ore so you can't tell exactly what grade or content their own mining produces alone. Also all their percent of RE in their mined material is estimates no actual figures even though they've been operating for quite a while. If it was a gold silver or copper mining company they would have been sued by now (they have been by the way). <br/><br/>I'm still waiting for the facts. But generally speaking you get a few ounces of good sellable purified RE product per ton of earth mined. I'm waiting for Moly to show its tons of earth to RE production.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Molycorp Earnings Preview: What To Look For</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1411421/comments?source=feed#comment-18578801</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18578801</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[RE makers are all trying to make more of the downstream product because there is more supply than demand. That is why China is trying to artificially limit the supply going out and pushing it to go out as component level product. Secondary, the proposal to make America a place where mining results in environmental catastrophe as well is not a good idea either. <br/><br/>Sooner or later Moly will run into the wrong side of environmental regulators and or their neighbors. There's not a big enough hole to dump all their processed waste (esp. the water and if they evaporate it all the energy cost is absurd). Water dumped in a big hole tends to seep into one water table or another along with heavy metals, etc. Last I read even Molycorp states the environmental risks in their reporting. It doesn't help that for a long time it was hard pressed to get the technical experts with even an inkling of real world RE processing to join them. I certainly wouldn't since they will be the first to blame in such an incident (can you say patsy).<br/><br/>Moly is a great story but the particulars under the story are very ugly.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 11:09:39 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[RE makers are all trying to make more of the downstream product because there is more supply than demand. That is why China is trying to artificially limit the supply going out and pushing it to go out as component level product. Secondary, the proposal to make America a place where mining results in environmental catastrophe as well is not a good idea either. <br/><br/>Sooner or later Moly will run into the wrong side of environmental regulators and or their neighbors. There's not a big enough hole to dump all their processed waste (esp. the water and if they evaporate it all the energy cost is absurd). Water dumped in a big hole tends to seep into one water table or another along with heavy metals, etc. Last I read even Molycorp states the environmental risks in their reporting. It doesn't help that for a long time it was hard pressed to get the technical experts with even an inkling of real world RE processing to join them. I certainly wouldn't since they will be the first to blame in such an incident (can you say patsy).<br/><br/>Moly is a great story but the particulars under the story are very ugly.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Molycorp Earnings Preview: What To Look For</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1411421/comments?source=feed#comment-18578231</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18578231</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Please read... ore is not the final processed stuff. It is the ore with enough of the RE to process.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 10:59:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Please read... ore is not the final processed stuff. It is the ore with enough of the RE to process.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Akram's Razor: Short CommVault Now</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1409041/comments?source=feed#comment-18559761</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18559761</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Good long term call. The issue is with a thinly traded stock bankers can push it up on an up market just to exit it which is probably happening now. This is a good stock to bet against when the market falls but so is 75% of the market.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 20:39:47 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Good long term call. The issue is with a thinly traded stock bankers can push it up on an up market just to exit it which is probably happening now. This is a good stock to bet against when the market falls but so is 75% of the market.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Molycorp Earnings Preview: What To Look For</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1411421/comments?source=feed#comment-18558031</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18558031</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;I expect additional operating losses, negative cash outflows and asset write-offs during Molycorp's earnings release.&quot; good call. For years now I've been saying RE mining in the US is insane. You have to process tons of ore and dump it somewhere. That means the best place to mine is somewhere no one cares about water contamination (mainly China these days). That's why RE mining stopped in the US for decades and probably shouldn't have restarted.<br/><br/>Molycorp in my mind is a scammy way of suckering in people to pay rich salaries to the founders on something they know will never be profitable unless they can scare the government into adding them into the government tax dole by scaring them into thinking third world countries own all the RE in the world. There is RE everywhere. RE means that it is a small percent of total earth mined not that it is located in only a few places like gold. That means tons of ore processed just to get a few ounces of the stuff. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 19:41:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;I expect additional operating losses, negative cash outflows and asset write-offs during Molycorp's earnings release.&quot; good call. For years now I've been saying RE mining in the US is insane. You have to process tons of ore and dump it somewhere. That means the best place to mine is somewhere no one cares about water contamination (mainly China these days). That's why RE mining stopped in the US for decades and probably shouldn't have restarted.<br/><br/>Molycorp in my mind is a scammy way of suckering in people to pay rich salaries to the founders on something they know will never be profitable unless they can scare the government into adding them into the government tax dole by scaring them into thinking third world countries own all the RE in the world. There is RE everywhere. RE means that it is a small percent of total earth mined not that it is located in only a few places like gold. That means tons of ore processed just to get a few ounces of the stuff. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Barron's Takes Another Swipe At Linn Energy</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1406881/comments?source=feed#comment-18537571</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18537571</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Personally, I'd be unsettled by using a distribution system who buys out the producers of what it distributes with the profits and capital it raises. That's what Rockefeller did. It means inevitably you will sell out to them or get screwed in the future. If I was an oil producer I'd never use their system unless I absolutely had to.<br/><br/>Last, if their distribution system was so great they wouldn't need to buy oil production to fill their pipeline. Barron's may not be right but there is good reason the be suspicious.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 11:43:06 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Personally, I'd be unsettled by using a distribution system who buys out the producers of what it distributes with the profits and capital it raises. That's what Rockefeller did. It means inevitably you will sell out to them or get screwed in the future. If I was an oil producer I'd never use their system unless I absolutely had to.<br/><br/>Last, if their distribution system was so great they wouldn't need to buy oil production to fill their pipeline. Barron's may not be right but there is good reason the be suspicious.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Taking Profits On First Solar As 'Promises, Promises' Begins To Be The New Theme</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1408711/comments?source=feed#comment-18537081</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18537081</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Demand for better efficiency in solar panels will make the solar industry tough for some time. First solar has quite a ways to go to make their solar efficiency noteworthy. Fortunately they are large or they'd be dead already. I think their best bet is to have enough cash to buy any new technology or get supply from it because their R&amp;D is pretty sad.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 11:36:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Demand for better efficiency in solar panels will make the solar industry tough for some time. First solar has quite a ways to go to make their solar efficiency noteworthy. Fortunately they are large or they'd be dead already. I think their best bet is to have enough cash to buy any new technology or get supply from it because their R&amp;D is pretty sad.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
