Seeking Alpha

shorty_is_screwed

shorty_is_screwed
Send Message
View as an RSS Feed
View shorty_is_screwed's Comments BY TICKER:
Latest  |  Highest rated
  • Energy Storage: Cheap Is Still Beating Cool [View article]
    Hey John,

    Curious what your thoughts are on ZBB's PECC technology.....something they co-developed with EATON Corp. A game changer, or something that anyone could copy if they wanted.

    Thanks and happy new year.
    Jan 2 03:34 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • Russell Rebalance: Are There Potential Buys in This Downturn? [View article]
    Very nice article......thanks.

    I would add AXTI to this list.

    Check them out.
    May 28 04:02 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Energy Storage is Not Needed for Renewables Integration [View instapost]
    Engstudent, the NREL isnt the one thats actually going to IMPLEMENT AES (Advanced Energy Storage). Its the utilities, like PG&E and DUKE energy that ARE CURRENTLY implementing AES. This is from PG&E's SGIP program:
    www.pge.com/includes/d...
    California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) rebate program initiated in 2001 to reduce peak demand on the grid
    Scheduled to continue accepting applications through 2012
    Provides incentives for the installation of new, qualifying self-generation equipment installed to meet all or a portion of the electric energy needs of a facility (Large Wind, Fuel Cell, and Advanced Energy Storage Systems)
    Program Administrators: 1. Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) 2. Southern California Edision (SCE) 3. Southern California Gas (SoCal Gas) 4. California Center for Sustainable Energy (CCSE) for San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E)

    Now, you have to ask yourself........why would they not only create a subsidy for AES but create an entire program around it, if they thought AES when it isnt needed?

    Now....since the utilities will likely be the ones buying and implementing AES, I guess it doesnt really matter what the NREL thinks.


    On Aug 28 12:14 PM engstudent wrote:

    > John, I'm more persuaded by NREL's quantitative studies than by Imre
    > Gyuk's arguments. EPRI published a report this month on storage ($10,000!)
    > the abstract of which stated:
    >
    > "To achieve commercialization, both distributed generation and energy
    > storage must address several key issues such as lower installed costs,
    > increased lifetime, and low maintenance costs."
    >
    > my.epri.com/portal/ser...
    >
    >
    > That doesn't sound like a ringing endorsement but you may have heard
    > differently. Is there anything online you could point me towards?
    >
    >
    > BTW, I came across a PHEV battery report ($10k) published this week
    > which you may be aware of: "Evaluation of Emerging Battery Technologies
    > for Plug-in Hybrid Vehicles". It states:
    >
    > "The cost of lithium batteries remains high ($500-1000 /kWh) when
    > purchased in relative small quantities, but detailed cost modeling
    > of batteries done at Argonne National Laboratory for the various
    > chemistries indicate that in high production volume (greater than
    > 100,000 packs per year), the costs to the OEMs of all chemistries
    > can be in the range of $250-400/kWh depending on the battery size
    > (kWh energy stored). The lithium titanate chemistry is projected
    > to have the highest cost, but it also will have the longest cycle
    > life."
    Dec 18 06:55 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Is Emcore Blinded By the Light? [View article]
    Nice...."Disclosure: Author is short EMKR"...no kidding!!! Up all night frantically trying to save his a$$.....too funny.
    Sep 19 08:52 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
COMMENTS STATS
4 Comments
1 Like