<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>David at Imperial Beach's Comments</title>
    <description>David at Imperial Beach's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/2656291/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Gold slides 1.1% amidst the World Gold Council reporting an 11% Y/Y decline in Q3 demand to 1.1K metric tons. Central banks remained steady buyers, but investment demand - ETPs, bars, coins - was off 16% Y/Y. The WGC notes 2011 Q3 is a tough comparison, and demand remains well above the 5-year average of 984.7 metric tons.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/667901?source=feed#comment-11642541</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11642541</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Apparently the Fed has announced a QE++ plan and then fallen short on the implementation. We simply should not be seeing this much market weakness if new money was flooding in from their interventions. Today practically everything is down, including the dollar. This tells me we are experiencing deflation, which in turn tells me that the Fed is not doing its job as per its last announcement. I just pulled the plug on the last of my investments. If I do anything for the rest of the year, it will be to take short positions.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:29:26 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Apparently the Fed has announced a QE++ plan and then fallen short on the implementation. We simply should not be seeing this much market weakness if new money was flooding in from their interventions. Today practically everything is down, including the dollar. This tells me we are experiencing deflation, which in turn tells me that the Fed is not doing its job as per its last announcement. I just pulled the plug on the last of my investments. If I do anything for the rest of the year, it will be to take short positions.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gold slides 1.1% amidst the World Gold Council reporting an 11% Y/Y decline in Q3 demand to 1.1K metric tons. Central banks remained steady buyers, but investment demand - ETPs, bars, coins - was off 16% Y/Y. The WGC notes 2011 Q3 is a tough comparison, and demand remains well above the 5-year average of 984.7 metric tons.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/667901?source=feed#comment-11642041</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11642041</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Divinecomedy, you make no sense. Stop drinking that &quot;cold medicine&quot; before you grace us with your comments.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:21:21 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Divinecomedy, you make no sense. Stop drinking that &quot;cold medicine&quot; before you grace us with your comments.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intel: The No-Nonsense Reason It's Down</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1008941/comments?source=feed#comment-11637231</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11637231</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Mediumterm seems to be the one with the myopia. Isn't what you said exactly what Ashraf said? So why should he eat humble pie ,and why do you accuse him of myopia?<br/><br/>Personally, I am of the humble opinion that instruction set is important, and ARM has already won the war in the cell phone market. If Intel wants to compete at the commodity end of the market it's going to need an ARM chip.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 09:54:50 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Mediumterm seems to be the one with the myopia. Isn't what you said exactly what Ashraf said? So why should he eat humble pie ,and why do you accuse him of myopia?<br/><br/>Personally, I am of the humble opinion that instruction set is important, and ARM has already won the war in the cell phone market. If Intel wants to compete at the commodity end of the market it's going to need an ARM chip.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intel: The No-Nonsense Reason It's Down</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1008941/comments?source=feed#comment-11636771</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11636771</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[In what way does a stock buyback unfairly help senior managers and ex-shareholders? As a shareholder of a growth stock, I want to see the stock price appreciate in value. Dividends are a somewhat annoying plus in that they benefit my stock broker who gets another commission when I reinvest and my government who taxes dividends higher than capital appreciation. I don't see any combination of salary, stock and options that unfairly benefit management in this equation. You too, can purchase options if you are feeling jealous of option holders.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 09:46:42 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[In what way does a stock buyback unfairly help senior managers and ex-shareholders? As a shareholder of a growth stock, I want to see the stock price appreciate in value. Dividends are a somewhat annoying plus in that they benefit my stock broker who gets another commission when I reinvest and my government who taxes dividends higher than capital appreciation. I don't see any combination of salary, stock and options that unfairly benefit management in this equation. You too, can purchase options if you are feeling jealous of option holders.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Algae Fuel For Regular Diesel Prices? Solazyme Makes It Happen</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1005961/comments?source=feed#comment-11590891</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11590891</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[While it's nice to know that we've got another alternative to petroleum in the works, it doesn't look like now is a good time to buy. Nobody likes to try to catch a falling knife.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 10:47:38 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[While it's nice to know that we've got another alternative to petroleum in the works, it doesn't look like now is a good time to buy. Nobody likes to try to catch a falling knife.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Just Sell Apple If You Are Nervous</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1005821/comments?source=feed#comment-11589891</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11589891</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Bambooman, I agree with your analysis and would add that a large part of Apple margins come at the cost of its suppliers. This is not a good business strategy for the long term. Eventually Chinese producers will figure out that they need to raise their bids in order to make a profit on Apple jobs. So add that as a large cost that will increase in future years. <br/><br/>Also, labor costs in developing countries are not stable. As workers become more educated in western economics, and as job availability increases, the workers demand more pay. I remember when I was working for a software company that was outsourcing part of its workforce to India. That area of India was seeing a rapid rise in job availability. We started to see a big employee retention problem right away. Often a new hire would simply fail to show up for work as they had gotten a better job offer between the time they accepted our offer and the  first day of work.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 10:29:14 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Bambooman, I agree with your analysis and would add that a large part of Apple margins come at the cost of its suppliers. This is not a good business strategy for the long term. Eventually Chinese producers will figure out that they need to raise their bids in order to make a profit on Apple jobs. So add that as a large cost that will increase in future years. <br/><br/>Also, labor costs in developing countries are not stable. As workers become more educated in western economics, and as job availability increases, the workers demand more pay. I remember when I was working for a software company that was outsourcing part of its workforce to India. That area of India was seeing a rapid rise in job availability. We started to see a big employee retention problem right away. Often a new hire would simply fail to show up for work as they had gotten a better job offer between the time they accepted our offer and the  first day of work.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Just Sell Apple If You Are Nervous</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1005821/comments?source=feed#comment-11589301</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11589301</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Djohnsonhot, you're not buying American when you're buying Apple products. Don't you know that they're made in China?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 10:17:45 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Djohnsonhot, you're not buying American when you're buying Apple products. Don't you know that they're made in China?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inside GLD: Q&amp;A With Tim Coyne Of State Street</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1000991/comments?source=feed#comment-11550431</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11550431</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[So the short answer is that when presented with the question of the difference in expense ratios versus (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iau' title='iShares Gold Trust ETF'>IAU</a>), they obfuscate and reply by raising other issues, issues which are of possible importance only to large institutional investors. For small investors, IAU is clearly the better choice.<br/><br/>On the question of the gold being in the vaults, I don't think there's any reason to believe that there are too few bars in the allocated account. Such an obvious shortfall would be too easy to detect during an audit. The real question is one that a physical inventory can't answer. Are any of those bars in any way hypothecated by the custodian? The custodian is, after all, a bank, and banks lend based upon the assets under their control. In fact, through fractional reserve lending banks lend many times as much as the assets under their control and use those reserve assets to cover any liquidity requirements implied by those loans.<br/><br/>One final question is what is being done about counterfeit bars. We know that gold-plated titanium bars have made it into the bullion bank vaults. This is not too surprising since the custodian relies on the assay report provided by the bar's producer in the normal case. When a titanium bar is discovered, what are the procedures? Are other bars from that producer checked? Are other bars entered into storage with that bar checked? Are any bars ever checked at random?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:55:32 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[So the short answer is that when presented with the question of the difference in expense ratios versus (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iau' title='iShares Gold Trust ETF'>IAU</a>), they obfuscate and reply by raising other issues, issues which are of possible importance only to large institutional investors. For small investors, IAU is clearly the better choice.<br/><br/>On the question of the gold being in the vaults, I don't think there's any reason to believe that there are too few bars in the allocated account. Such an obvious shortfall would be too easy to detect during an audit. The real question is one that a physical inventory can't answer. Are any of those bars in any way hypothecated by the custodian? The custodian is, after all, a bank, and banks lend based upon the assets under their control. In fact, through fractional reserve lending banks lend many times as much as the assets under their control and use those reserve assets to cover any liquidity requirements implied by those loans.<br/><br/>One final question is what is being done about counterfeit bars. We know that gold-plated titanium bars have made it into the bullion bank vaults. This is not too surprising since the custodian relies on the assay report provided by the bar's producer in the normal case. When a titanium bar is discovered, what are the procedures? Are other bars from that producer checked? Are other bars entered into storage with that bar checked? Are any bars ever checked at random?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>HP's Next Chance: High-End Tablets</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1002251/comments?source=feed#comment-11547811</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11547811</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Actually, I had a high-end HP all-in-one printer. I worked with HP customer service for nearly a month to resolve the software issues with the advanced features of the device before I gave up and exchanged it for a more bare bones model. So I know they do have customer service. But customer service can't fix profoundly broken software that never should have been shipped in the first place. HP has no quality control to speak of. They probably have such a department, but it is entirely impotent.<br/><br/>My printer was just one example I observed. I also worked as a software developer on a product that supported the HP Unix (HPUX) operating system as well as 2 other Unix brands. HPUX always had the most bugs that had to be worked around. It was the least popular brand of Unix and gave us the most problems. If it were not for one particular customer that insisted on it being supported, we would surely have dropped support for it.<br/><br/>Even when HP software works more or less as intended, it is bloated junk that hogs the machine and is overly difficult to install because HP insists on providing their own installation procedures instead of using the approved vendor install procedure. In short, HP management shows themselves incapable of successfully managing a software project.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:13:27 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Actually, I had a high-end HP all-in-one printer. I worked with HP customer service for nearly a month to resolve the software issues with the advanced features of the device before I gave up and exchanged it for a more bare bones model. So I know they do have customer service. But customer service can't fix profoundly broken software that never should have been shipped in the first place. HP has no quality control to speak of. They probably have such a department, but it is entirely impotent.<br/><br/>My printer was just one example I observed. I also worked as a software developer on a product that supported the HP Unix (HPUX) operating system as well as 2 other Unix brands. HPUX always had the most bugs that had to be worked around. It was the least popular brand of Unix and gave us the most problems. If it were not for one particular customer that insisted on it being supported, we would surely have dropped support for it.<br/><br/>Even when HP software works more or less as intended, it is bloated junk that hogs the machine and is overly difficult to install because HP insists on providing their own installation procedures instead of using the approved vendor install procedure. In short, HP management shows themselves incapable of successfully managing a software project.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What's Driving The Market And Where Do We Go From Here?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1001711/comments?source=feed#comment-11546481</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11546481</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It seemed to me that the market should have had a dramatic fall earlier in the year. Instead we got an on-again off-again, funky market that declined some months and rose other months, depending mostly on whether the dollar or the euro was winning the race to worthlessness. In the end, of course, we know that both are just paper and are equally worth exactly as much as the politicians who control them. My question is did the Plunge Protection Team prevent the expected dramatic fall, and if so, does it have sufficient power to continue to prevent it?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:52:02 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It seemed to me that the market should have had a dramatic fall earlier in the year. Instead we got an on-again off-again, funky market that declined some months and rose other months, depending mostly on whether the dollar or the euro was winning the race to worthlessness. In the end, of course, we know that both are just paper and are equally worth exactly as much as the politicians who control them. My question is did the Plunge Protection Team prevent the expected dramatic fall, and if so, does it have sufficient power to continue to prevent it?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>With U.S. Expected To Be Largest Oil Producer By 2017, Is It Time To Buy Energy Stocks?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1001061/comments?source=feed#comment-11518561</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11518561</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[If we've really got as much oil and NG coming online as the IEA says we do, then it's best to stay with (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy' title='SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF'>SPY</a>) instead of switching to (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xle' title='Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF'>XLE</a>). The producers are already having a hard time keeping the glut of NG from pricing itself below the cost to produce. If domestic oil gets to be as abundant then you want to be on the buying side (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy' title='SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF'>SPY</a>), not the producing side (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xle' title='Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF'>XLE</a>).]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:58:58 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[If we've really got as much oil and NG coming online as the IEA says we do, then it's best to stay with (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy' title='SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF'>SPY</a>) instead of switching to (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xle' title='Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF'>XLE</a>). The producers are already having a hard time keeping the glut of NG from pricing itself below the cost to produce. If domestic oil gets to be as abundant then you want to be on the buying side (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy' title='SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF'>SPY</a>), not the producing side (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xle' title='Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF'>XLE</a>).]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>General Mills: The Technically Risk-Free Stock?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/990401/comments?source=feed#comment-11432291</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11432291</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Canuck1, you are confusing a beta of 1 with a beta of 0. Beta = 1 means the stock has a 1:1 exposure to the systemic risk. Beta = 0 means the stock has negligible exposure to the systemic risk. Beta expresses no opinion about risks other than the systemic risk. In other words, there are certain risks associated with the S&amp;P 500 (the usual benchmark for computing beta). (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gis' title='General Mills, Inc.'>GIS</a>) with a beta at or very near 0 is supposedly insulated from those risks. However, there might be other risks that affect GIS that the S&amp;P 500 is immune to.<br/><br/>In particular, GIS might logically have exposure to grains and sugar commodity prices which would have negligible effect on the S&amp;P 500.<br/><br/>How can GIS be immune to the usual market forces that affect nearly all S&amp;P 500 stocks? GIS is a major beneficiary of the food stamps program. People don't stop buying Cheerios when they lose their job. They get food stamps and keep right on eating their favorite sugary breakfast cereals.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 15:27:59 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Canuck1, you are confusing a beta of 1 with a beta of 0. Beta = 1 means the stock has a 1:1 exposure to the systemic risk. Beta = 0 means the stock has negligible exposure to the systemic risk. Beta expresses no opinion about risks other than the systemic risk. In other words, there are certain risks associated with the S&amp;P 500 (the usual benchmark for computing beta). (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gis' title='General Mills, Inc.'>GIS</a>) with a beta at or very near 0 is supposedly insulated from those risks. However, there might be other risks that affect GIS that the S&amp;P 500 is immune to.<br/><br/>In particular, GIS might logically have exposure to grains and sugar commodity prices which would have negligible effect on the S&amp;P 500.<br/><br/>How can GIS be immune to the usual market forces that affect nearly all S&amp;P 500 stocks? GIS is a major beneficiary of the food stamps program. People don't stop buying Cheerios when they lose their job. They get food stamps and keep right on eating their favorite sugary breakfast cereals.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Eagle Has Dropped For All The Wrong Reasons</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/992981/comments?source=feed#comment-11430141</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11430141</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[In truth, (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aeo' title='American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.'>AEO</a>) is unlikely to maintain 40% growth in the coming quarters simply because 40% is an unrealistically high bar and the economy is going to provide a strong headwind. Apple, too, has been significantly discounted because it is unlikely to maintain its same pace going forward, no matter how much young people want to be seen holding Apple iPhones and wearing AE clothing. In my neighborhood everybody wears Hollister anyway because of their surfing theme. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 14:46:23 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[In truth, (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aeo' title='American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.'>AEO</a>) is unlikely to maintain 40% growth in the coming quarters simply because 40% is an unrealistically high bar and the economy is going to provide a strong headwind. Apple, too, has been significantly discounted because it is unlikely to maintain its same pace going forward, no matter how much young people want to be seen holding Apple iPhones and wearing AE clothing. In my neighborhood everybody wears Hollister anyway because of their surfing theme. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is It Time To Buy Gold Again?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/995421/comments?source=feed#comment-11429121</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11429121</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[No matter how irresponsible US politicians and bankers get, it seems that they can't hold a candle to those in Europe. Euro holders have been bidding up the dollar all year, and it looks like they will do it again next year too. Gold may well rise in spite of that headwind, but a strong dollar is bearish in the short term for gold. <br/><br/>I'm not that convinced that the fiscal cliff will be all that bullish for gold. It will definitely send stocks lower, and investors this year have been treating gold more like a &quot;risk on&quot; investment than a &quot;risk off&quot; one. Gold may fall in sympathy with stocks, or simply stay put as the two forces (the &quot;inflation haven&quot; versus the &quot;risk on&quot;) conflict with each other.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 14:21:37 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[No matter how irresponsible US politicians and bankers get, it seems that they can't hold a candle to those in Europe. Euro holders have been bidding up the dollar all year, and it looks like they will do it again next year too. Gold may well rise in spite of that headwind, but a strong dollar is bearish in the short term for gold. <br/><br/>I'm not that convinced that the fiscal cliff will be all that bullish for gold. It will definitely send stocks lower, and investors this year have been treating gold more like a &quot;risk on&quot; investment than a &quot;risk off&quot; one. Gold may fall in sympathy with stocks, or simply stay put as the two forces (the &quot;inflation haven&quot; versus the &quot;risk on&quot;) conflict with each other.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Protected Principal Retirement Strategy: Royalty Trusts Redux</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/985761/comments?source=feed#comment-11425111</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11425111</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The oil industry never goes too long without a crisis. (I seem to remember at least one each spring and fall that causes the price of gas at the pump to rise.) There ought to be plenty of opportunities to sell oil at their $100 target price in the future. And 3% is less than the real rate of inflation, so I think those projections are actually rather conservative. Looking at the price ratio of gold to oil, it doesn't seem to me that we've seen any effects from peak oil yet.<br/><br/>I do worry a bit that production is being pulled forward from the projections because I know these wells are shallow and have relatively short lifetimes as it is. If I recall, the projection calls for production to begin it's decline almost immediately after the last well is drilled. But right now the stock is acting like the last well was already drilled six months ago.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 12:56:11 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The oil industry never goes too long without a crisis. (I seem to remember at least one each spring and fall that causes the price of gas at the pump to rise.) There ought to be plenty of opportunities to sell oil at their $100 target price in the future. And 3% is less than the real rate of inflation, so I think those projections are actually rather conservative. Looking at the price ratio of gold to oil, it doesn't seem to me that we've seen any effects from peak oil yet.<br/><br/>I do worry a bit that production is being pulled forward from the projections because I know these wells are shallow and have relatively short lifetimes as it is. If I recall, the projection calls for production to begin it's decline almost immediately after the last well is drilled. But right now the stock is acting like the last well was already drilled six months ago.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Daily State Of The Markets: Things Don't Matter Until They Do, But Then...</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/994511/comments?source=feed#comment-11423341</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11423341</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Sometimes things matter, and matter again, and then matter some more. This particular market decline has been ongoing all year, with a brief respite when the euro oscillated upward after their sovereign bonds got a break from the politicians. Now the euro is oscillating lower again, and pushing the dollar higher as a result. It's hard for other investments to compete against a rising dollar. <br/><br/>But long term, the dollar must go lower. Uncle Ben keeps coloring more paper green, making all the other pretty green-colored paper worth less as a result.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 12:24:05 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sometimes things matter, and matter again, and then matter some more. This particular market decline has been ongoing all year, with a brief respite when the euro oscillated upward after their sovereign bonds got a break from the politicians. Now the euro is oscillating lower again, and pushing the dollar higher as a result. It's hard for other investments to compete against a rising dollar. <br/><br/>But long term, the dollar must go lower. Uncle Ben keeps coloring more paper green, making all the other pretty green-colored paper worth less as a result.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Daily State Of The Markets: Things Don't Matter Until They Do, But Then...</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/994511/comments?source=feed#comment-11422431</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11422431</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Not only that, but he's manic/depressive and he frequently forgets to take his medicine.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 12:02:56 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Not only that, but he's manic/depressive and he frequently forgets to take his medicine.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Today In Commodities: Lots Of Moving Parts In Currencies</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/993141/comments?source=feed#comment-11422031</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11422031</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It looks like you meant &quot;wondering&quot; where you wrote &quot;wandering&quot;.<br/><br/>It seems hard to justify much optimism in the dollar with the fiscal cliff looming and the Fed's determination to debase. Congress and POTUS haven't changed, so politics as usual, and plenty of it. That's more bearish than bullish in my book. Makes metals look all the more attractive.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 11:54:27 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It looks like you meant &quot;wondering&quot; where you wrote &quot;wandering&quot;.<br/><br/>It seems hard to justify much optimism in the dollar with the fiscal cliff looming and the Fed's determination to debase. Congress and POTUS haven't changed, so politics as usual, and plenty of it. That's more bearish than bullish in my book. Makes metals look all the more attractive.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What If Apple Weren't A Tech Stock?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/991571/comments?source=feed#comment-11420571</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11420571</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You also can't use it as a skateboard unless you've got really tiny feet, and even then, without wheels, you aren't going anywhere.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 11:28:20 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You also can't use it as a skateboard unless you've got really tiny feet, and even then, without wheels, you aren't going anywhere.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What If Apple Weren't A Tech Stock?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/991571/comments?source=feed#comment-11420391</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11420391</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;... this company should be rationally trading at a PE ratio somewhere between 20 to 25 times earnings.&quot; There's really no need to read the article further than this. Even a PE of 20 is getting irrational! No company can keep growing indefinitely at a compounded growth rate of 20 percent or more. That Apple has done so until it is the largest company by market cap in the entire market is a tribute to its success, but sadly, it is simply not sustainable. If you don't believe me, figure out for yourself how long it would take for Apple to consume the entire GDP of the US at this rate. Since people need to eat as well, Apple can't simply assume that a never-ending supply of consumers with a never-ending supply of ready cash for luxury goods will continue to exist in the future. Exponential growth curves always end. Period. They are not sustainable.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 11:24:39 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;... this company should be rationally trading at a PE ratio somewhere between 20 to 25 times earnings.&quot; There's really no need to read the article further than this. Even a PE of 20 is getting irrational! No company can keep growing indefinitely at a compounded growth rate of 20 percent or more. That Apple has done so until it is the largest company by market cap in the entire market is a tribute to its success, but sadly, it is simply not sustainable. If you don't believe me, figure out for yourself how long it would take for Apple to consume the entire GDP of the US at this rate. Since people need to eat as well, Apple can't simply assume that a never-ending supply of consumers with a never-ending supply of ready cash for luxury goods will continue to exist in the future. Exponential growth curves always end. Period. They are not sustainable.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Protected Principal Retirement Strategy: Royalty Trusts Redux</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/985761/comments?source=feed#comment-11387051</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11387051</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I own (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/per' title='SandRidge Permian Trust'>PER</a>) and feel that the yield should be attracting more investor interest and support than it is. It's clearly the best of the lot, yet it has performed poorly this last quarter. The majority of their production is hedged to an oil price of approximately $100 per barrel, significantly above the current WTIC. What gives? Is the market unable to distinguish between distributions which outperform from those which underperform?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 16:06:12 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I own (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/per' title='SandRidge Permian Trust'>PER</a>) and feel that the yield should be attracting more investor interest and support than it is. It's clearly the best of the lot, yet it has performed poorly this last quarter. The majority of their production is hedged to an oil price of approximately $100 per barrel, significantly above the current WTIC. What gives? Is the market unable to distinguish between distributions which outperform from those which underperform?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Invest Like A Jedi And Sell Before The Fiscal Cliff</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/989601/comments?source=feed#comment-11376491</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11376491</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Maybe Republicans will learn their lesson and not nominate a fox to guard the hen-house again. (Probably won't though.)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 12:36:05 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Maybe Republicans will learn their lesson and not nominate a fox to guard the hen-house again. (Probably won't though.)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Finding Bank Of America's True Value: Legacy Assets And Legal Risks Continue To Weigh Heavily On Its Market Price</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/985341/comments?source=feed#comment-11323931</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11323931</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[mweaver,<br/><br/>Punishment has not been swift or sure and it is only now that we are starting to see what could be an ongoing series.<br/><br/>If anything DOJ has shone great favoritism to the banks. BAC has done unspeakable crimes that have damaged the economies of not just the US, but the entire world, all because a megalomaniac in North Carolina went on a wild and cancerous acquisition and lending spree.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 10:58:31 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[mweaver,<br/><br/>Punishment has not been swift or sure and it is only now that we are starting to see what could be an ongoing series.<br/><br/>If anything DOJ has shone great favoritism to the banks. BAC has done unspeakable crimes that have damaged the economies of not just the US, but the entire world, all because a megalomaniac in North Carolina went on a wild and cancerous acquisition and lending spree.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Speculating Bernanke has taken the lead in exit polls, ZH notes gold has gone vertical in the past few minutes (chart). GLD +2%. SLV +3.1%. Oil is on the move as well, USO +2.6%.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/644281?source=feed#comment-11292031</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11292031</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The surge &quot;just happened&quot; to come at noon EST, which &quot;just happens&quot; to be the time that the afternoon gold fix is done in London. It has nothing to do with POTUS politics or potential POTUS influence on the Fed, though that's always a good story, especially on election day. The morning and afternoon gold fixes often &quot;just happen&quot; to differ by $30-40 dollars, which is (you guessed it) about 2% of $1700. So this fluctuation is well within the normal range.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 14:02:17 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The surge &quot;just happened&quot; to come at noon EST, which &quot;just happens&quot; to be the time that the afternoon gold fix is done in London. It has nothing to do with POTUS politics or potential POTUS influence on the Fed, though that's always a good story, especially on election day. The morning and afternoon gold fixes often &quot;just happen&quot; to differ by $30-40 dollars, which is (you guessed it) about 2% of $1700. So this fluctuation is well within the normal range.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google: We Got Act I Right, How About Act II?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/981871/comments?source=feed#comment-11290321</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11290321</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Google is the next Xerox, for better or worse. Xerox invested in lots of new technologies, most notably they developed the Smalltalk programming language and the Star, precursor of the Apple Lisa and MacIntosh. They weren't always able to cash in on them, though. Likewise Google has invested in lots of projects that they may never be able to capitalize on, except that it earns them goodwill.<br/><br/>Unfortunately, Google has also squandered that goodwill and made it clear that they don't value and respect customer's privacy rights. I, for one, avoid using google's search engine because I know that they retain those searches and use them for their own purposes and also make them available to government agencies on demand. Not what I have in mind happening when I enter a search term! What if I happen to enter something that is meaningful slang to a drug enforcement agency, or even worse, an anti-terrorist security agency of the US government. I may find myself being forced to lie on the ground at gunpoint while my house is ransacked looking for contraband or evidence of terrorist activity all because google didn't respect my right to reasonable privacy.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 13:25:45 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Google is the next Xerox, for better or worse. Xerox invested in lots of new technologies, most notably they developed the Smalltalk programming language and the Star, precursor of the Apple Lisa and MacIntosh. They weren't always able to cash in on them, though. Likewise Google has invested in lots of projects that they may never be able to capitalize on, except that it earns them goodwill.<br/><br/>Unfortunately, Google has also squandered that goodwill and made it clear that they don't value and respect customer's privacy rights. I, for one, avoid using google's search engine because I know that they retain those searches and use them for their own purposes and also make them available to government agencies on demand. Not what I have in mind happening when I enter a search term! What if I happen to enter something that is meaningful slang to a drug enforcement agency, or even worse, an anti-terrorist security agency of the US government. I may find myself being forced to lie on the ground at gunpoint while my house is ransacked looking for contraband or evidence of terrorist activity all because google didn't respect my right to reasonable privacy.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gold Bullion ETFs, Closed-End Funds, Or Gold Mining Stocks - Which Is The Best Investment?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/980651/comments?source=feed#comment-11287031</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11287031</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Noneleft makes a valid point that this article ignored an alternative that many investors would find attractive. Personally I favor (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gdx' title='Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF'>GDX</a>) or its 3x alternative (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nugt' title='Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 3x Shares ETF'>NUGT</a>) because they tend to follow the price of bullion better than any individual miner stock. They tend to act as leveraged plays on the price of gold because they are actually plays on the spread between the price of gold and the cost of mining it. However, gold is a depleting asset, so the costs of mining do increase over time. Long term, you're better off owning (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iau' title='iShares Gold Trust ETF'>IAU</a>) or physical metal in your own or a rented vault.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 12:07:05 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Noneleft makes a valid point that this article ignored an alternative that many investors would find attractive. Personally I favor (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gdx' title='Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF'>GDX</a>) or its 3x alternative (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nugt' title='Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 3x Shares ETF'>NUGT</a>) because they tend to follow the price of bullion better than any individual miner stock. They tend to act as leveraged plays on the price of gold because they are actually plays on the spread between the price of gold and the cost of mining it. However, gold is a depleting asset, so the costs of mining do increase over time. Long term, you're better off owning (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iau' title='iShares Gold Trust ETF'>IAU</a>) or physical metal in your own or a rented vault.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How The Monetary System And Government Spending Impact Investment</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/980881/comments?source=feed#comment-11286121</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11286121</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Inflation (as distinct from higher interest rates) favors all debt because in diluting the currency you are devaluing the unit in which  the debt is denominated, thus making it easier to pay back. Think of it as borrowing a slice of pie when there is only one pie, and then someone new arrives at the picnic and contributes a second pie. There are now twice as many slices of pie, so it is now twice as easy to acquire one slice and pay back your debt.<br/><br/>If lenders decide they want more interest because they want an inflation premium to make up for the difference in value between the old and new dollars (or pie slices), that will disadvantage borrowers if they have to refinance, but they can avoid that disadvantage by paying off the debt on schedule.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 11:46:11 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Inflation (as distinct from higher interest rates) favors all debt because in diluting the currency you are devaluing the unit in which  the debt is denominated, thus making it easier to pay back. Think of it as borrowing a slice of pie when there is only one pie, and then someone new arrives at the picnic and contributes a second pie. There are now twice as many slices of pie, so it is now twice as easy to acquire one slice and pay back your debt.<br/><br/>If lenders decide they want more interest because they want an inflation premium to make up for the difference in value between the old and new dollars (or pie slices), that will disadvantage borrowers if they have to refinance, but they can avoid that disadvantage by paying off the debt on schedule.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How The Monetary System And Government Spending Impact Investment</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/980881/comments?source=feed#comment-11285191</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11285191</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[In reality the monetary scheme of the US is much more complicated than the analysis above. First off, as Dorky pointed out in his comment, the Fed, a private banking institution, issues US dollars, not the US government. Therefore, when you hold US dollars, you hold &quot;bonds&quot; of a private bank, said bonds not giving any interest, but subject to dilution without notice. This dilution may or may not occur if the US government runs a deficit, the decision being entirely at the arbitrary discretion of the Fed. The US government is not as sovereign as it appears to the uneducated. The US government is sovereign only so long as the Fed chooses to perpetuate the myth.<br/><br/>When the US government issues bonds, they are issuing a true debt instrument. An investor in such bonds is granted no equity stake in the government or the economy through these instruments. Without additional Fed action, these bonds compete with other bonds in the marketplace for the bond investor's dollar on a preferential basis. Thus, excessive US government bond issuance tends to inhibit the economy by blocking more productive debt issuance. The Fed often chooses, as in the current economy, to monetize these bonds by issuing a similar amount of currency. This, however, is by no means automatic or mandatory. Nor is it perfect. The Fed is only indirectly in control of the money supply and it often overshoots or undershoots its targets. (There is obviously more to the story but it is being deliberately simplified at this point.)<br/><br/>In the usual case where the Fed is accommodative to US government debt, bond holders do, indeed, suffer a dilution effect as the article suggests, but it is indirect. Bonds are denominated in Fed dollars, pay Fed dollars as interest, and pay off the principle in Fed dollars. If Fed dollars are diluted, the value of US bonds will be diluted by a like amount.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 11:27:35 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[In reality the monetary scheme of the US is much more complicated than the analysis above. First off, as Dorky pointed out in his comment, the Fed, a private banking institution, issues US dollars, not the US government. Therefore, when you hold US dollars, you hold &quot;bonds&quot; of a private bank, said bonds not giving any interest, but subject to dilution without notice. This dilution may or may not occur if the US government runs a deficit, the decision being entirely at the arbitrary discretion of the Fed. The US government is not as sovereign as it appears to the uneducated. The US government is sovereign only so long as the Fed chooses to perpetuate the myth.<br/><br/>When the US government issues bonds, they are issuing a true debt instrument. An investor in such bonds is granted no equity stake in the government or the economy through these instruments. Without additional Fed action, these bonds compete with other bonds in the marketplace for the bond investor's dollar on a preferential basis. Thus, excessive US government bond issuance tends to inhibit the economy by blocking more productive debt issuance. The Fed often chooses, as in the current economy, to monetize these bonds by issuing a similar amount of currency. This, however, is by no means automatic or mandatory. Nor is it perfect. The Fed is only indirectly in control of the money supply and it often overshoots or undershoots its targets. (There is obviously more to the story but it is being deliberately simplified at this point.)<br/><br/>In the usual case where the Fed is accommodative to US government debt, bond holders do, indeed, suffer a dilution effect as the article suggests, but it is indirect. Bonds are denominated in Fed dollars, pay Fed dollars as interest, and pay off the principle in Fed dollars. If Fed dollars are diluted, the value of US bonds will be diluted by a like amount.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Platinum Is Becoming Popular In India: What It Means For The White Metal</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/978411/comments?source=feed#comment-11254701</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11254701</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[This is supposedly an article on platinum. Why is the only chart one for gold? Why not at least put in the corresponding chart for platinum? I'd like to see the numbers and see just how dependent platinum really is on the auto industry. My understanding is that they can substitute palladium for platinum in auto catalysts. Where they really need it is diesel catalysts.<br/><br/>In any case, this is the first I've heard of Indians substituting platinum for gold, which is good news for platinum if true. The disadvantage of using platinum in jewelry is, of course, that it's hard to tell platinum from the cheaper palladium and even cheaper silver. Gold does not have that problem.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:49:21 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[This is supposedly an article on platinum. Why is the only chart one for gold? Why not at least put in the corresponding chart for platinum? I'd like to see the numbers and see just how dependent platinum really is on the auto industry. My understanding is that they can substitute palladium for platinum in auto catalysts. Where they really need it is diesel catalysts.<br/><br/>In any case, this is the first I've heard of Indians substituting platinum for gold, which is good news for platinum if true. The disadvantage of using platinum in jewelry is, of course, that it's hard to tell platinum from the cheaper palladium and even cheaper silver. Gold does not have that problem.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Commodity Chart Of The Day: Natural Gas</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/979011/comments?source=feed#comment-11253561</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11253561</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You give useful trading advice, but I hate these &quot;chart of the day&quot; articles because I know I'm going to have to struggle to see anything on these charts with their thin colored lines on black backgrounds. Without enlargement all I can see are the black background and (if I squint) a couple of the lighter moving averages and horizontal lines. I can't read any of the labels or any of the darker (green and red) lines.<br/><br/>If you can adjust your software to print bolder lines and labels on a white background it would be much appreciated.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:25:24 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You give useful trading advice, but I hate these &quot;chart of the day&quot; articles because I know I'm going to have to struggle to see anything on these charts with their thin colored lines on black backgrounds. Without enlargement all I can see are the black background and (if I squint) a couple of the lighter moving averages and horizontal lines. I can't read any of the labels or any of the darker (green and red) lines.<br/><br/>If you can adjust your software to print bolder lines and labels on a white background it would be much appreciated.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
