G20 and IMF Gold: A Late April Fools' [View article]
Printing money to finance additional government spending is not a desirable option. A government’s borrowing from the central bank should be driven by monetary policy objectives, viz., the creation of sufficient liquidity to support an economy’s real growth, preferably on a relatively noninflationary basis. Even if a government were to explicitly seek to rely on the possibility of money creation to facilitate a somewhat higher level of government expenditure, there are clear limits, given the potential impact that this would have on inflation in the domestic economy. Given the money multipliers in most developing countries, the scope for additional expenditure that can be financed in principle by money creation is rarely above 1 percent of GDP, unless a clear and relatively quick supply-side impact can be obtained from the higher level of expenditure. Except in situations where inflation is being gradually brought down from hyperinflationary levels, it would be unusual for the IMF to endorse a program that consciously targeted an inflation rate above 10–12 percent (Khan and Senhadji, 2000). Long experience suggests that high inflation is not conducive to sustained rapid growth, private investment (Fischer, 1993), or distributional equity, as the poor are most heavily taxed in an inflationary environment.
Finally, regarding gold, the news is of weak rather than strong production at least in once gold dominant S. Africa. There, gold production has been waning rather steadily with production last year falling to the lowest level since the Boer War all the way back in 1901! Last year, gold production in S. Africa fell 14% compared to the year previous, falling to 232 tonnes, down from 270 tonnes mined and produced in 2007. Once the dominant gold miner by a huge margin, S. Africa has now fallen to third behind China as #1 and the US as #2. China in 2008 produced 288 tonnes of gold; the US produced 234 tonnes. S. Africans continued declining production has had a material effect upon global production totals, as one might reasonably expect. According to GFMS, gold production globally fell 3.6% in 2008 compared to 2007, falling to 2385 tonnes. This is the lowest sum of gold mined since the mid-90s. Worse for the mining companies, the cost of production an ounce of gold has been rising almost relentlessly, and are now close to $500/ounce, up 22% from that of 2007. For those who care, last year only four nations had more gold mining activity than they did in 2007: Russia; China; Ghana and Mexico, with the Russians increasing production by approximately 11 tonnes, while the other three increased production by 8-9 tonnes each. Canada, Australia, S. Africa and Indonesia saw their mining operations fall, with Canada producing 8 tonnes less gold; Australia producing 33 fewer tonnes; S. Africa producing 38 tonnes and Indonesian production falling 52 tonnes.
G20 and IMF Gold: A Late April Fools' [View article]
government’s borrowing from the central bank should be driven by monetary policy
objectives, viz., the creation of sufficient liquidity to support an economy’s real growth,
preferably on a relatively noninflationary basis. Even if a government were to explicitly seek
to rely on the possibility of money creation to facilitate a somewhat higher level of
government expenditure, there are clear limits, given the potential impact that this would
have on inflation in the domestic economy. Given the money multipliers in most developing
countries, the scope for additional expenditure that can be financed in principle by money
creation is rarely above 1 percent of GDP, unless a clear and relatively quick supply-side
impact can be obtained from the higher level of expenditure. Except in situations where
inflation is being gradually brought down from hyperinflationary levels, it would be unusual
for the IMF to endorse a program that consciously targeted an inflation rate above 10–12
percent (Khan and Senhadji, 2000). Long experience suggests that high inflation is not
conducive to sustained rapid growth, private investment (Fischer, 1993), or distributional
equity, as the poor are most heavily taxed in an inflationary environment.
www.imf.org/external/p...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~...
Apparently the IMF does not read its own publications.
See what Brown can do for you.
Gold Economics Questionable; Facts Forecast Lower Prices [View article]
Finally, regarding gold, the news is of weak rather than
strong production at least in once gold dominant S.
Africa. There, gold production has been waning rather
steadily with production last year falling to the lowest
level since the Boer War all the way back in 1901!
Last year, gold production in S. Africa fell 14%
compared to the year previous, falling to 232 tonnes,
down from 270 tonnes mined and produced in 2007.
Once the dominant gold miner by a huge margin, S.
Africa has now fallen to third behind China as #1 and
the US as #2. China in 2008 produced 288 tonnes of
gold; the US produced 234 tonnes.
S. Africans continued declining production has had a
material effect upon global production totals, as one
might reasonably expect. According to GFMS, gold
production globally fell 3.6% in 2008 compared to 2007,
falling to 2385 tonnes. This is the lowest sum of gold
mined since the mid-90s. Worse for the mining
companies, the cost of production an ounce of gold
has been rising almost relentlessly, and are now close
to $500/ounce, up 22% from that of 2007.
For those who care, last year only four nations had
more gold mining activity than they did in 2007: Russia;
China; Ghana and Mexico, with the Russians
increasing production by approximately 11 tonnes,
while the other three increased production by 8-9
tonnes each. Canada, Australia, S. Africa and
Indonesia saw their mining operations fall, with Canada
producing 8 tonnes less gold; Australia producing 33
fewer tonnes; S. Africa producing 38 tonnes and
Indonesian production falling 52 tonnes.