Seeking Alpha

ABG » Comments » Single Comment |

  • Will COMEX Default on Gold and Silver? [View article]
    I do not believe that COMEX will default. That is why I recommend that people buy gold and silver, for physical delivery there. I merely intend to explain why it will not happen even if, as appears obvious, the exchanges and CFTC have allowed the 90% cover rules to be violated. If you bother to read the article, you will learn that. In a worst case scenario, the exchange itself will be the counterparty.


    On Dec 22 04:39 PM Donatella wrote:

    > Having lived through every imaginable commodity scenario in my 30+
    > years in the commodity business, I can say that the information listed
    > above is confused. Sorry to say. It suggests that the onus of
    > preventing defaults on physical deliveries on the commodity exchanges
    > is in the hands of the CFTC. It is not. It is controlled by the
    > exchanges themselves. It is incumbent upon the exchanges to use
    > a series of measures to limit spot month positions when deliverable
    > supplies are not available. I would suggest that you read the Delivery
    > rules in the Exchange rulebook, posted on the CME website under COMEX.
    > The rules are as follows. Sellers must have deliverable stocks in
    > exchange liscensed warehouses the day prior to the delivery. If
    > these are not available, the seller will be forced by the clearing
    > member (financial institution which is a member of a clearing house).
    > The exchanges responsibility is to prevent spot month futures positions
    > from becoming so large in relation to the physical supply available
    > for delivery that they will adjust the margin on positions as they
    > get closer to delivery. In the past, the exchange (for platinum)
    > has charged significantly over 100% of the value of the physical
    > metal on futures positions in the spot month to prevent disruptive
    > market conditions from taking place. Also, the clearing members
    > (financial institutions which comprise the clearing house) are responsible
    > for accepting clients and have stringent requirements for doing business
    > with "speculators&q... and trade houses and are the ones which
    > will be responsible for any defaults. It would be useful for you
    > to read the rules on defaults and how the clearing house structure
    > handles potential defaults. What clearing members do NOT want are
    > clients which could potentially default on deliveries and will not
    > deal with them having positions in the spot month if they do not
    > have the material at hand. In the history of COMEX there was one
    > default -- in the early 80s, Volume Investors, and the loss was made
    > up by the clearing members, leaving all players on the exchange and
    > every position whole. The exchange endured the Hunt mess, the 9/11
    > attack (which left millions of ounces in the basement of the exchange
    > in the Mocotta Metals warehouse facility ultimately intact.) Believe
    > me, if you are looking for CDS or Subprime type cloak and dagger
    > scenarios at the COMEX, believe me they have lived through everything
    > and the checks and balances and transparency in this process is so
    > clear that there is no way the precious metals Aramgeddon you describe
    > would happen. They would charge 150-200% margin to eliminate large
    > spot months positions first if the clearing members were reckless
    > enough to take such business in the first place.
    Dec 23 00:06 am |Rating: 0 -1
All Comments by ABG »
Comments by Ticker
ABG's
Comments Stats
37 comments
Rating: 25 (38 - 13 )