This is complete rubbish. Global warming is a fact and it is also a fact that the sharp rise in CO2 emissions is responsible for it.
Science has always been a public funding exercise and not until the global warming hypothesis reared its head did conservatives try to argue that public funding taints the views of researchers.
Seems awfully c-o-n-v-e-n-i-e-n-t ....
Many developed much larger per capital CO2 emissions than the US. France for example emits six tons per person per year whereas the US figure is 22 tons.
How did the French accomplish that? They converted from oil and coal to nuclear power.
Didn't break the French economy. Won't break the American economy.
EFA: Diversify Your Portfolio Outside the U.S. [View article]
Carbon Capping Debate - Will Results Favor Wall St.? [View article]
Science has always been a public funding exercise and not until the global warming hypothesis reared its head did conservatives try to argue that public funding taints the views of researchers.
Seems awfully c-o-n-v-e-n-i-e-n-t ....
Many developed much larger per capital CO2 emissions than the US. France for example emits six tons per person per year whereas the US figure is 22 tons.
How did the French accomplish that? They converted from oil and coal to nuclear power.
Didn't break the French economy. Won't break the American economy.