Imagine a 17% Unemployment Rate? We're There [View article]
Clive, I think your 17% number is too low. I prefer the SGS number at 22% because it accounts for more of the "still unemployed but discouraged from looking" and the "took this janitors job til something better comes along" numbers than the BLS U6 number does.
HEY S/A: quit editing my posts! Just post what I write or else FVCK OFF.
-
Clive, I think your 17% number is too low. I prefer the SGS number at 22% because it accounts for more of the "still unemployed but discouraged from looking" and the "took this janitors job til something better comes along" numbers than the BLS U6 number does.
Oct 05 02:50 am
|Rating:
+2
0
All Comments by Homer II »Imagine a 17% Unemployment Rate? We're There [View article]
HEY S/A: quit editing my posts! Just post what I write or else FVCK OFF.