Banking's Ins and Outs: $188 Billion from Bailout, $1.6 Billion to Execs [View article]
I believe in capitalism and the implied pay for performance contract, but I have trouble with the bank execs receiving this kind of $ when they are being subsidized by the taxpayer because they took undue risk. Why don't we look at a clawback provision whereby we take back $ that was ill-gotten via reckless leverage and risk. Unfortunately, the seeds of failure were planted a number of years ago and we are now cleaning up the mess. Why do we reward malfeasance? Why do we subsidize recklessness? Why do we pay for incompetence?
Banking's Ins and Outs: $188 Billion from Bailout, $1.6 Billion to Execs [View article]