Scott-ATA's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com http://seekingalpha.comuser/272153/comments http://seekingalpha.com/article/97631-analysts-see-value-in-cpst?source=feed#comment-268657 268657
Notice, the editor FIXED what I said was wrong.

Thanks.]]> Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:49:58 -0400
Notice, the editor FIXED what I said was wrong.

Thanks.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/97631-analysts-see-value-in-cpst?source=feed#comment-268039 268039
When the facts are that CPST has no LONG TERM debt and actually has 32.667 CASH, the rest is in Inventories, Prepaid expenses, and accounts receivable.

Ask any accountant and they will tell you that cash does not equal inventories, prepaid expenses, or account receivable, and that there is a reason they are separated on the balance sheet.

For those that are really serious about CPST, please AT LEAST read the 10-Q. Jeremy, I think you might want to read this too

www.sec.gov/Archives/e...]]> Sun, 28 Sep 2008 22:23:59 -0400
When the facts are that CPST has no LONG TERM debt and actually has 32.667 CASH, the rest is in Inventories, Prepaid expenses, and accounts receivable.

Ask any accountant and they will tell you that cash does not equal inventories, prepaid expenses, or account receivable, and that there is a reason they are separated on the balance sheet.

For those that are really serious about CPST, please AT LEAST read the 10-Q. Jeremy, I think you might want to read this too

www.sec.gov/Archives/e...]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/97248-when-turmoil-opportunity?source=feed#comment-268038 268038
So basically what you're saying is that this time isn't like the other times quoted in your article because we're only at 50% higher instead of 75% higher. The entire article is therefore, out of the sample.

Thanks, but no thanks.]]> Sun, 28 Sep 2008 22:22:35 -0400
So basically what you're saying is that this time isn't like the other times quoted in your article because we're only at 50% higher instead of 75% higher. The entire article is therefore, out of the sample.

Thanks, but no thanks.]]>