lostalot's Comments

Clean Energy ETF Options

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:27:30 -0500

I lost a ton on PBW. Doesn't always keep the holding you'd expect or hope for. I would recommend buying the individual stocks over this one.

UQM Technologies: Rumors Behind Sharp Increase, and Possible Plummet

Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:27:28 -0500

Regarding the photo referred to by Whinthorn, above. Yes, that is UQM, but just an undersized model for show. The specs that Chrysler needs is for a much more powerful unit. UQM must first develop it. Time has passed since this article was posted. Perhaps in Jan '09, UQM may have something. However, whether Chrysler can still afford to develop this prototype plug-in hybrid, and whether UQM remains the source, remains to be seen.

Too Much Optimism for Gilead Sciences?

Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:21:03 -0500

On 12/29/09, the 100 day SMA crossed under the 20 day SMA. The last time this occured, on 3/5/08, GILD went up 20+%, over the next 5+ months .

Too Much Optimism for Gilead Sciences?

Tue, 30 Dec 2008 13:04:42 -0500

I've lost a lot everywhere but GILD. It's been berry berry good to me. And I'm glad you're wrong about shorting it now. I've been in it for over a decade and have followed it closely. You say Cramer says "buy" which to you means "sell". However, you're overlooking the many other, very accurate, gurus out there who are still long on GILD. You're premature on this one.

Ivanhoe Mines is a Bargain, But...

Mon, 17 Nov 2008 10:17:34 -0500

Please confirm/correct your notation that Rio Tinto, to which you give ticker symbol RIO, invested in this company. The ticker RIO is not for Rio Tinto. It is for Brazilian mining firm Companhia Vale do ADR. Which company invested in IVN, Rio Tinto, or Vale?

Rentech: Homegrown Synthetic Fuel On the Near Horizon

Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:27:28 -0400

At a shareholders meeting RTK announced it would cost 6 billion to build a full scale refinery. They can't get the funding for it. The fuel they produced is at a trial facility which is not able to produce enough to make it a viable market commodity.

UQM Technologies: Rumors Behind Sharp Increase, and Possible Plummet

Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:18:59 -0400

That photo shows a prototype which is not powerful enough for what Chrysler wants. What Chrysler wants does not exist.

UQM Technologies: Rumors Behind Sharp Increase, and Possible Plummet

Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:18:05 -0400

That photo shows a prototype which is not powerful enough for what Chrysler hopes to produce. What Chrysler wants does not exist.

On Sep 26 06:13 PM whinthorn wrote:

> Just look at the Autobloggen green photographs of the equipment
www.autobloggreen.com/.../