While I welcome criminal investigations of AIG executives I think that this will largely be a sideshow to appease an angry public. The real scandal of the credit crisis is that the wild excesses of the derivatives market were largely legal. Wall Street executives know that there is no reason to break the law when you can simply direct a compliant politician to change the law on your behalf.
I love how Murdoch blames the credit crisis on government backed loans (Freddie & Fannie) to poor people. Did the government force Wall Street to securitize these loans, slice them into unrecognizable tranches and resell them endlessly for never ending fees? Did government force the banks to leverage themselves 30/1 on speculation that the home prices would never stop rising? Did the government force Wall Street to invest trillions of dollars in the unregulated credit default swaps market on the bet that asset prices would always keep rising? People like Murdoch have been preaching the benefits of deregulation for years and now that the system that they engineered has collapsed they are looking for a convenient scapegoat.
I had incorrectly assumed that the New York Fed was a regulator of Wall Street, after reading Morgenson's article, now I know better. This may be old news to you but to me it was another frightening example of Wall Street lacking any meaningful government regulation. I also think that it is absurd to suggest that Wall Streeters have been the victims of discrimination and somehow lack input in Washington. The last time I looked, virtually all the financial decision makers in Washington are Wall Streeters (including Geithner) and that is the real problem.
Banks, Policy, and Irreversible Errors [View article]
The reaction of the Obama Administration to the banking crisis is perplexing. Unlike Bush, who knew he could kick the can down the street to the next administration, Obama is a new president who must deal with this crisis. Obama's decision to simply pour endless amounts of money into the large banks and hope the economy improves is incredibly short sighted. I can only guess that he foolishly followed the advice of men like Summers and Geithner who helped to create this disastrous banking system and now can't admit that they were wrong.
Big Banks Are Buying Mortgages: A Good Thing? [View article]
The banks can do anything because they know that the Obama administration will bail them out with taxpayer money if anything goes wrong. TARP led to PPIP which will lead to PPIP II. Apparently, trickle down economics never has to end.
Any test can be passed when the test is rigged. The government has already committed to giving these large banks billions in additional money through the PPIP plan. That is the governments sole solution to credit crisis; buy toxic assets from the banks with taxpayer money and hope that the market for theses assets recovers in a few years time.
Sort by:
Latest | Highest ratedAIG's Collapse: Was It Criminal? [View article]
Rupert Murdoch Interview: 'Economy Weak; Danger of Inflation Great' [View article]
Picking on Geithner [View article]
Pierre Bourdieu, Tim Geithner, and Cultural Capital [View article]
Is FDIC's Sheila Bair Proposing a New RTC? [View article]
My Problems with Summers' Five Points [View article]
Paulson Throws Bernanke Under the Bus, Backs Ken Lewis [View article]
Pondering the Fate of an Oil Exporter: Squandering One's Inheritance Cheaply [View article]
Banks, Policy, and Irreversible Errors [View article]
Notable by Their Absence at Tuesday's Hearings [View article]
Why Is Allen Stanford Being Prosecuted While Other Banks Get Bailed Out? [View article]
Financials' Better-Than-Expected Earnings: Real or Fake? [View article]
Time for Transparency on Bailing Out the Bank Bondholders [View article]
Big Banks Are Buying Mortgages: A Good Thing? [View article]
The Banking Time Bomb Test [View article]