Talk Me Down From the Wells Fargo Ledge [View article]
Instead of taxpayers bailing out Wall Street, would it make more sense for Wall Street to bail out Wall Street?
The market lost over a trillion dollars earlier this week. Those with the most to lose in the event of continued difficulty (and who have the most to gain by a strong turn-around) are wealthy individual and institutional investors. Why not put together a market-sensitive private entity (e.g. something similar to a mutual fund or index fund) and give corporate America a too-good-to-be-true tax deduction allowing them to deduct, say, 60% of their investment in this entity. This approach would be aimed at large investors. The entity would issue say a billion shares at $1,000 per share (or 100 million shares at $10,000 per share and the money (a trillion dollars) would go to a bail out fund.
The one-time deductibility of these monies would not amount to a government payout because these investors are already maximizing their deductions. They would simply shift focus in order to take advantage of the larger write offs.
Isn't this better than a simple government bail out? what am I missing? Why am I the only one who has thought of this?
Ray Bourhis 37 Redwood Drive Box 773 Ross, Ca 94957
Sort by:
Latest | Highest ratedTalk Me Down From the Wells Fargo Ledge [View article]
The market lost over a trillion dollars earlier this week. Those with the most to lose in the event of continued difficulty (and who have the most to gain by a strong turn-around) are wealthy individual and institutional investors. Why not put together a market-sensitive private entity (e.g. something similar to a mutual fund or index fund) and give corporate America a too-good-to-be-true tax deduction allowing them to deduct, say, 60% of their investment in this entity. This approach would be aimed at large investors. The entity would issue say a billion shares at $1,000 per share (or 100 million shares at $10,000 per share and the money (a trillion dollars) would go to a bail out fund.
The one-time deductibility of these monies would not amount to a government payout because these investors are already maximizing their deductions. They would simply shift focus in order to take advantage of the larger write offs.
Isn't this better than a simple government bail out? what am I missing? Why am I the only one who has thought of this?
Ray Bourhis
37 Redwood Drive Box 773
Ross, Ca 94957
415 407 7773
RFBourhis@aol.com