TARP Watch: Riskier, Less Transparent and More Corrupt [View article]
Ken Lewis's job was on the line, not his life. He could have backed out of the deal or demanded better terms, saving the shareholders. Inspite of its implied threat, in the end, the Fed would have still backed BofA. Like ML, it was also too big to fail.
This is a comment from Oct.1, 2008. Seemed easy enough to implement:
There's Still a Better Bailout Available Since all the trouble rests with tumbling home prices, resulting in massive CDO losses, why not act at the source? Stop issuing new residential building permits until unsold housing inventory is absorbed. Since new house sales are only a small fraction of all sales, this would take some time. Certainly, such a plan would be an unamerican, anti-capitalist program, just like the one being proposed by Paulson to rescue nearly bankrupt financial institutions. However, it would likely be much cheaper to temporarily compensate the new home builders and their suppliers for lost income than to rescue these behemoth banks. About 500,000 new homes are sold yearly at an average price of just over $200,000 resulting in an approx $100 billion/year subsidy. This should have the desired effect of stabilizing the housing price freefall and the value of CDO's. A gradual return to normal permitting could be allowed in several years. The US is simply overbuilt and this can be remedied in time by a growing population if no more inventory is added. Oct 01 23:22 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article Your Comments Stream Stats
There's Still a Better Bailout Available [View article]
Since all the trouble rests with tumbling home prices, resulting in massive CDO losses, why not act at the source? Stop issuing new residential building permits until unsold housing inventory is absorbed. Since new house sales are only a small fraction of all sales, this would take some time. Certainly, such a plan would be an unamerican, anti-capitalist program, just like the one being proposed by Paulson to rescue nearly bankrupt financial institutions. However, it would likely be much cheaper to temporarily compensate the new home builders and their suppliers for lost income than to rescue these behemoth banks. About 500,000 new homes are sold yearly at an average price of just over $200,000 resulting in an approx $100 billion/year subsidy. This should have the desired effect of stabilizing the housing price freefall and the value of CDO's. A gradual return to normal permitting could be allowed in several years. The US is simply overbuilt and this can be remedied in time by a growing population if no more inventory is added.
Sort by:
Latest | Highest ratedTARP Watch: Riskier, Less Transparent and More Corrupt [View article]
Housing: Where Is the Bottom? [View article]
There's Still a Better Bailout Available Since all the trouble rests with tumbling home prices, resulting in massive CDO losses, why not act at the source? Stop issuing new residential building permits until unsold housing inventory is absorbed. Since new house sales are only a small fraction of all sales, this would take some time. Certainly, such a plan would be an unamerican, anti-capitalist program, just like the one being proposed by Paulson to rescue nearly bankrupt financial institutions. However, it would likely be much cheaper to temporarily compensate the new home builders and their suppliers for lost income than to rescue these behemoth banks. About 500,000 new homes are sold yearly at an average price of just over $200,000 resulting in an approx $100 billion/year subsidy. This should have the desired effect of stabilizing the housing price freefall and the value of CDO's. A gradual return to normal permitting could be allowed in several years. The US is simply overbuilt and this can be remedied in time by a growing population if no more inventory is added.
Oct 01 23:22 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment |View article
Your Comments Stream Stats
1 Comments, 0 , 0
Total Comment Stream rating - = 0
There's Still a Better Bailout Available [View article]