Seeking Alpha

Jim Myrtle

Jim Myrtle
Send Message
View as an RSS Feed
View Jim Myrtle's Comments BY TICKER:
Latest  |  Highest rated
  • The Fed Should Stimulate Lending [View article]
    They didn't buy any toxic assets.
    The guaranteed mortgages they bought, when rates were higher, have thrown off interest, every year since they bought them. Some were refinanced and some were paid off when houses were sold.
    That reduced their outstanding MBS holdings. Profitably.

    If you have a specific question based on one of your links, cut and paste the section you want to discuss and ask your questions.
    Aug 17, 2012. 09:31 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • The Fed Should Stimulate Lending [View article]
    Be specific.
    Aug 17, 2012. 08:17 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • The Fed Should Stimulate Lending [View article]
    "The Federal reserve went in and bought trillions of dollars of toxic assets and it was a good deal"

    Right, the Fed bought trillions in guaranteed MBS and Treasuries and made hundreds of billions of dollars.

    "Since the Federal Reserve sorely does not want to realize a massive loss on these shenanigans"

    Since the Fed has massive gains on their positions, what are you babbling about?

    "This is the only way for these toxic assets to become profitable"

    They were profitable the instant the Fed bought them. Get a clue.
    Aug 17, 2012. 05:25 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • The Fed Should Stimulate Lending [View article]
    Unless they sold them, Citi, for instance is reducing them, yes, banks still have mortgages, some underperforming, on their balance sheets.

    Nope, the Fed never bought anything but guaranteed bonds.

    They did have some crap in the Maiden Lanes, bought at a large discount to face value and turning a decent profit since 2008.
    Aug 17, 2012. 03:02 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • The Fed Should Stimulate Lending [View article]
    "The stuff is so valueless that Warren Buffet has been scrambling around trying to buy up the "crap," too"

    These guys don't know much, but they sure know how to repeat their (incorrect) talking points.
    Aug 17, 2012. 02:29 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • The Fed Should Stimulate Lending [View article]
    "And what "market" rate is Warren paying for these assets - face value or discounted?"

    If he's buying Agencies, he's paying above par.

    http://on.wsj.com/Ona3cb
    Aug 17, 2012. 02:28 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • The Fed Should Stimulate Lending [View article]
    "The Fed bought these assets so the banks would not have to mark them down"

    We're talking about government guaranteed agency MBS.
    Trading well above par.

    How are those toxic?
    Aug 17, 2012. 02:26 PM | 2 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • The Fed Should Stimulate Lending [View article]
    "What did these banks sell this crap to the FED if they were so great?"

    Allow me to repeat myself.
    The Fed didn't buy them because they had no buyers.
    The Fed bought them to boost money supply and bring down rates.

    The Fed paid market price. For guaranteed mortgages.
    And hasn't lost a penny on them.
    Has made tens of billions annually on them and has tens of billions of unrealized capital gains on the ones that haven't been refinaced away from them.
    Keep claiming they were crap with zero evidence.
    It makes you look silly.
    Aug 17, 2012. 01:18 PM | 2 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • The Fed Should Stimulate Lending [View article]
    "If these assets had buyers, the Fed would not have needed to buy them"

    The Fed didn't buy them because they had no buyers.
    The Fed bought them to boost money supply and bring down rates.

    "And now the Fed is stuck with these assets"

    Yes, the Fed is stuck with these high yielding mortgages with very large unrealized capital gains. Just awful.
    Aug 17, 2012. 11:54 AM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • The Fed Should Stimulate Lending [View article]
    Yeah, survival beats the alternative.
    Aug 17, 2012. 09:49 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • The Fed Should Stimulate Lending [View article]
    The first that you know.
    Still waiting for some proof the capital position matters one bit.
    Aug 17, 2012. 09:48 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • The Fed Should Stimulate Lending [View article]
    "These were toxic assets when they bought them"

    Government guaranteed mortgages were toxic?

    "How do you figure that they did not overpay for these assets?"

    Do you have proof they did? Beyond your feelings?
    Aug 17, 2012. 09:47 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • The Fed Should Stimulate Lending [View article]
    "That's a net cushion of 4.44%"

    It seems like it was only hours ago that you were claiming they only earned 2% on assets, things have improved.

    Great, so in a few years, the rate goes to 4.75% and then the Fed doesn't give the Treasury any money for a while. So what?
    The Treasury survived before they rec'd $80 billion a year, if they go 5 or 10 years getting zero, the republic will survive.
    Aug 16, 2012. 09:20 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • The Fed Should Stimulate Lending [View article]
    "And they won't resign, they'll sterilize."

    They've got a lot of room to sterilize at higher rates before they blow thru their $80 billion annual profit. Not a problem.
    Aug 16, 2012. 07:41 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • The Fed Should Stimulate Lending [View article]
    "In chess terms, you seem to be saying that the Fed's rook is pinned"

    I may have a better chess term.

    A player whose turn it is to move who has no move that does not worsen his position is said to be in zugzwang.

    Sell bonds, immediate losses, negative capital.
    Pay 6% to sterilize reserves, long term losses, negative capital.

    Do nothing, hyperinflation.

    I guess the Fed should just resign.
    Aug 16, 2012. 05:05 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
COMMENTS STATS
1,138 Comments
790 Likes