Is the Winner Pfizer, Merck or Roche? [View article]
The Article is a "Trash - self serving personal openion - except @PFE which is known to many of us-other than those PFE-PUMPERS at CNBC..
On Mar 21 07:04 AM donzelion wrote:
> "Roche is getting the most “bang for the buck”..." > > Why? Roche already owned 56% of Genentech. Normally, majority ownership > is not "meaningless" - far from it. Normally, the way to measure > the extra value added by buying out the extra 44% would involve serious > cost savings or synergies - but both companies, by most reports, > are well-run shops that didn't go into excessive bloat. So what's > the big advantage of merging operations and taking 100%?
Is the Winner Pfizer, Merck or Roche? [View article]
On Mar 21 07:04 AM donzelion wrote:
> "Roche is getting the most “bang for the buck”..."
>
> Why? Roche already owned 56% of Genentech. Normally, majority ownership
> is not "meaningless" - far from it. Normally, the way to measure
> the extra value added by buying out the extra 44% would involve serious
> cost savings or synergies - but both companies, by most reports,
> are well-run shops that didn't go into excessive bloat. So what's
> the big advantage of merging operations and taking 100%?