Lithium Ion Batteries and GEVs: False Gods for the New Millennium [View article]
Well, it's true that recyclable batteries are the future; the problem with Lithium is the high cost, and the lack of scrap value. Lithium is a one-way resource, from brine deposits for new Li to the dump for discarded batteries. So the only real possibilities are lead and NiMH batteries, of course, because they recycle. Using old batteries to make new ones, no new mining is needed for this operation.
But Natural Gas vehicles do work and make sense; there is no problem with making CNG charging stations, they already exist. What I stress is that if you are a "believer" in fuel cells, ask youself, why not CNG? It's here, now, it operates at lower pressure than H2, doesn't require an expensive fuel cell stack, and any car or truck can be converted to CNG. Ironically, natural gas is used to refine gasoline as well as extract high-density oil from tar sands; the natural gas used to refine gasoline would carry a CNG car about as far as the gasoline produced would take an oil-fired car. But the money is in oil, so both EVs and CNG are not pursued. Suprise??
On Nov 29 09:17 AM nrgrat wrote:
> I guess I'm not clear on whether this is an article about what makes > sense or what is reality. Natural gas makes a whole lot of sense > for transport, and never more than right now with these huge reserves > being tapped from Gorgon off of Australia to Forgotonia, Pa. But > the reality is that the auto majors tried this a decade ago. They > got killed. They're not going back. Nobody is going to build a U.S. > network of CNG stations for Toyota. I agree with everything you're > saying, except the 'only significant drawback' part about the lack > of stations. You are discounting some pretty recent pain. Nobody > is going to invest that kind of money in technology that everyone > describes as a bridge to battery technology. Sorry, it's battery > or bust. Everything else is smoke and mirrors.
How PHEVs and EVs Will Sabotage America's Drive for Energy Independence [View article]
On the contrary! Despite all the hype, there is no plug-in car for sale (except the eBox and Tesla, which involve a waiting list).
There is NO EV juggernaut; it's all a lie. There IS NO shortage of batteries now except in the fetid imagination of Big Oil paid sockpuppets.
Just as they "worry" about taxing the grid to power EVs, when there are no EVs!!
As Elon Must stated, don't worry about pastures for unicorns until there ARE some unicorns.
On Aug 26 01:44 PM John Petersen wrote:
> Tom, I try to keep the level of emotion to a minimum, but sometimes > I'm less effective at that than others. > > CanEginTx and Mark Divy, many thanks for refining the details on > my rough recollection from college chemistry. > > Zenfar, I'm no great respecter of EPA estimates, but they do provide > a reference point. The real choke point in all of this is battery > manufacturing capacity and until we can make all the batteries we > would ever want, national energy policy has to favor putting the > limited supply of batteries in the applications where they'll do > the most good in terms of reducing gasoline consumption. I agree > that the whole sector is in for massive growth and despite my contrary > mutterings, there is an awful lot of momentum behind the push for > PHEVs and EVs. One blogger throwing spitballs at that supertanker > isn't likely to change anything, but it may open some investor's > eyes to the broader opportunity that will unfold over the next few > years.
Lithium Ion Batteries and GEVs: False Gods for the New Millennium [View article]
But Natural Gas vehicles do work and make sense; there is no problem with making CNG charging stations, they already exist. What I stress is that if you are a "believer" in fuel cells, ask youself, why not CNG? It's here, now, it operates at lower pressure than H2, doesn't require an expensive fuel cell stack, and any car or truck can be converted to CNG. Ironically, natural gas is used to refine gasoline as well as extract high-density oil from tar sands; the natural gas used to refine gasoline would carry a CNG car about as far as the gasoline produced would take an oil-fired car. But the money is in oil, so both EVs and CNG are not pursued. Suprise??
On Nov 29 09:17 AM nrgrat wrote:
> I guess I'm not clear on whether this is an article about what makes
> sense or what is reality. Natural gas makes a whole lot of sense
> for transport, and never more than right now with these huge reserves
> being tapped from Gorgon off of Australia to Forgotonia, Pa. But
> the reality is that the auto majors tried this a decade ago. They
> got killed. They're not going back. Nobody is going to build a U.S.
> network of CNG stations for Toyota. I agree with everything you're
> saying, except the 'only significant drawback' part about the lack
> of stations. You are discounting some pretty recent pain. Nobody
> is going to invest that kind of money in technology that everyone
> describes as a bridge to battery technology. Sorry, it's battery
> or bust. Everything else is smoke and mirrors.
How PHEVs and EVs Will Sabotage America's Drive for Energy Independence [View article]
There is NO EV juggernaut; it's all a lie. There IS NO shortage of batteries now except in the fetid imagination of Big Oil paid sockpuppets.
Just as they "worry" about taxing the grid to power EVs, when there are no EVs!!
As Elon Must stated, don't worry about pastures for unicorns until there ARE some unicorns.
On Aug 26 01:44 PM John Petersen wrote:
> Tom, I try to keep the level of emotion to a minimum, but sometimes
> I'm less effective at that than others.
>
> CanEginTx and Mark Divy, many thanks for refining the details on
> my rough recollection from college chemistry.
>
> Zenfar, I'm no great respecter of EPA estimates, but they do provide
> a reference point. The real choke point in all of this is battery
> manufacturing capacity and until we can make all the batteries we
> would ever want, national energy policy has to favor putting the
> limited supply of batteries in the applications where they'll do
> the most good in terms of reducing gasoline consumption. I agree
> that the whole sector is in for massive growth and despite my contrary
> mutterings, there is an awful lot of momentum behind the push for
> PHEVs and EVs. One blogger throwing spitballs at that supertanker
> isn't likely to change anything, but it may open some investor's
> eyes to the broader opportunity that will unfold over the next few
> years.