<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Steve in TN's Comments</title>
    <description>Steve in TN's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/283653/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Why I'm Bullish And We Are Not In A Bubble</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1459531/comments?source=feed#comment-19204721</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19204721</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I agree with most of the author's description of the U.S. economy in this very well written article, but I can't help but be concerned about the headwinds our current government is putting in place.  Specifically, Obamacare &amp; a continuos stream of regulations that impede business formation and success.<br/>I wonder what the percentage growth to our economy has to be subtracted from an &quot;optimal&quot; growth rate are due to these impediments. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 10:11:59 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I agree with most of the author's description of the U.S. economy in this very well written article, but I can't help but be concerned about the headwinds our current government is putting in place.  Specifically, Obamacare &amp; a continuos stream of regulations that impede business formation and success.<br/>I wonder what the percentage growth to our economy has to be subtracted from an &quot;optimal&quot; growth rate are due to these impediments. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I'm An Irrationally Exuberant Investor In Tesla</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1457141/comments?source=feed#comment-19172921</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19172921</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Tony Pow,<br/>You're not aware of one fact :<br/>Auto enthusiasts love the Model S.   It drives great, looks great, holds lots of people &amp; luggage, and is fast as hell.<br/>Not just green enthusiasts want the Model S.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:21:25 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Tony Pow,<br/>You're not aware of one fact :<br/>Auto enthusiasts love the Model S.   It drives great, looks great, holds lots of people &amp; luggage, and is fast as hell.<br/>Not just green enthusiasts want the Model S.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tesla's Glory Days Will Be Few As Bigger Competitors Are Already Catching Up</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1452541/comments?source=feed#comment-19136291</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19136291</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[One possible tail wind to the Tesla sales would be higher gasoline prices.  With a slow growth economy and a complete turnaround in future U.S. oil production estimates to the upside, the situation would normally not be too advantageous to an electric car manufacturer.   Given that this has not noticeably affected Tesla Model S sales points to the fact that this is a very desirable car irrespective of gas prices.   Low or stagnant gas prices would likely hurt the mainstream EV sales from the mass-market auto companies - but not the Tesla Model S. <br/>Car enthusiasts love this car for reasons mentioned by earlier posts.  Just like Porsche has carved out a very lucrative place in high-end sports cars, Tesla is doing the same for high-end EVs.<br/>I honestly don't believe GM, Ford, and the Japanese can come up with a worthy competitor to the Model S that will appeal as much to the well-heeled car enthusiasts who are the ones buying the Tesla.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:12:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[One possible tail wind to the Tesla sales would be higher gasoline prices.  With a slow growth economy and a complete turnaround in future U.S. oil production estimates to the upside, the situation would normally not be too advantageous to an electric car manufacturer.   Given that this has not noticeably affected Tesla Model S sales points to the fact that this is a very desirable car irrespective of gas prices.   Low or stagnant gas prices would likely hurt the mainstream EV sales from the mass-market auto companies - but not the Tesla Model S. <br/>Car enthusiasts love this car for reasons mentioned by earlier posts.  Just like Porsche has carved out a very lucrative place in high-end sports cars, Tesla is doing the same for high-end EVs.<br/>I honestly don't believe GM, Ford, and the Japanese can come up with a worthy competitor to the Model S that will appeal as much to the well-heeled car enthusiasts who are the ones buying the Tesla.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Dark Ages of Bernanke's Tenure</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1454061/comments?source=feed#comment-19125191</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19125191</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I wonder what our economic growth would have been in the last 5 years had we had a conservative as president ?<br/><br/>Oops, I'd better be careful; I don't want to get audited.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:51:44 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I wonder what our economic growth would have been in the last 5 years had we had a conservative as president ?<br/><br/>Oops, I'd better be careful; I don't want to get audited.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A New Market Beating Dividend Fund</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1452811/comments?source=feed#comment-19113641</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19113641</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[While I believe your thesis is correct over the very long term, but now....?<br/>A lot of the stocks in the index are overbought.   The high dividend stocks with growing dividends have been the place to be in this extreme low interest rate world and will continue to outperform until the Fed changes policy.   This is the exact opposite of the investment climate in 1999-2000.  In that period high volatility growth stocks were the place to be.  Now the fad is high dividend stocks.<br/>I admit most of my portfolio currently contains dividend growth stocks, but during the next major downturn in the market I will be diversifying to some degree out of DG stocks and into those of a more cyclical nature.<br/>We must be nearing a peak in high dividend stocks.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 09:43:53 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[While I believe your thesis is correct over the very long term, but now....?<br/>A lot of the stocks in the index are overbought.   The high dividend stocks with growing dividends have been the place to be in this extreme low interest rate world and will continue to outperform until the Fed changes policy.   This is the exact opposite of the investment climate in 1999-2000.  In that period high volatility growth stocks were the place to be.  Now the fad is high dividend stocks.<br/>I admit most of my portfolio currently contains dividend growth stocks, but during the next major downturn in the market I will be diversifying to some degree out of DG stocks and into those of a more cyclical nature.<br/>We must be nearing a peak in high dividend stocks.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1449081/comments?source=feed#comment-19064761</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19064761</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I don't blame Apple for getting all the legal tax breaks it can and help the future of their company &amp; shareholders.   It will mean less wasteful spending in the billions that the Obama administration squanders every day.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 08:33:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I don't blame Apple for getting all the legal tax breaks it can and help the future of their company &amp; shareholders.   It will mean less wasteful spending in the billions that the Obama administration squanders every day.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Extreme Outcomes: Sound Portfolio Advice For The Long-Haul</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1439121/comments?source=feed#comment-18912031</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18912031</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Outstanding article.<br/>Behavioral economics is something I need to read more of.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 15:22:06 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Outstanding article.<br/>Behavioral economics is something I need to read more of.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1439571/comments?source=feed#comment-18895411</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18895411</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot; I think the legacy of the Obama administration will be that nothing was accomplished in 8 years.&quot;<br/><br/>I respectfully disagree - we got socialized medicine which is all Prez O wanted as his legacy.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 10:09:26 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot; I think the legacy of the Obama administration will be that nothing was accomplished in 8 years.&quot;<br/><br/>I respectfully disagree - we got socialized medicine which is all Prez O wanted as his legacy.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1439571/comments?source=feed#comment-18895161</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18895161</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The difference between Benghazi and the embassy attacks during the Bush administration is that the deaths at Benghazi could have been prevented but weren't due to political reasons by the Obama administration.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 10:06:39 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The difference between Benghazi and the embassy attacks during the Bush administration is that the deaths at Benghazi could have been prevented but weren't due to political reasons by the Obama administration.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sell In May? Maybe A Little, But Rotate</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1412771/comments?source=feed#comment-18573391</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18573391</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I think Survivor4 has nailed it. <br/>I was planning on writing a similar post but he did a better job of it.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 09:35:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I think Survivor4 has nailed it. <br/>I was planning on writing a similar post but he did a better job of it.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fixed Income Momentum - May 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1406171/comments?source=feed#comment-18510811</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18510811</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I can't help thinking that at some point in the future when the economy really starts to improve that all of the bond categories will trend negative.   Is there any strategy that will tell us to get out of all fixed income investments ?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 17:48:23 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I can't help thinking that at some point in the future when the economy really starts to improve that all of the bond categories will trend negative.   Is there any strategy that will tell us to get out of all fixed income investments ?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More Buffett/CNBC: "Bonds (AGG, BND, TLT) are priced artificially," he says, and investors in long-term paper stand to lose a terrific amount of money. It echos weekend comments where he told Omaha concert-goers, "I feel sorry for people that have clung to fixed-dollar investments."</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/999841?source=feed#comment-18489461</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18489461</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[If we have a stock market correction in the next month or so treasuries will go up in value.    Warren is right in the &quot;long term&quot;, but I'm holding for now.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 09:48:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[If we have a stock market correction in the next month or so treasuries will go up in value.    Warren is right in the &quot;long term&quot;, but I'm holding for now.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Can One Trade Be Both Good For Me And Bad For Me?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1393581/comments?source=feed#comment-18365221</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18365221</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I also sold KMB due to it's overvaluation as shown on F.A.S.T. graphs.   My problem as an investor is a bad habit of not buying a replacement until there is a general market correction.  As you can probably tell I'm new to the game of div. growth investing (even though my chronological age is not young).    <br/>I feel very uncomfortable buying when the market is near a high even though some very good individual stocks are having their own &quot;correction&quot;.   So as a result I'm patiently waiting for a market downturn which may not materialize for quite a while.<br/>I wish I knew how to get over this &quot;mental condition.&quot;]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 13:56:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I also sold KMB due to it's overvaluation as shown on F.A.S.T. graphs.   My problem as an investor is a bad habit of not buying a replacement until there is a general market correction.  As you can probably tell I'm new to the game of div. growth investing (even though my chronological age is not young).    <br/>I feel very uncomfortable buying when the market is near a high even though some very good individual stocks are having their own &quot;correction&quot;.   So as a result I'm patiently waiting for a market downturn which may not materialize for quite a while.<br/>I wish I knew how to get over this &quot;mental condition.&quot;]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>S&amp;P 500: Respect This Rally</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1383281/comments?source=feed#comment-18267551</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18267551</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;..market is going to crash in the next 18 months&quot;   from mano1963.<br/><br/>If this is your rational for going short now, then I'm going 100% long !]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:07:13 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;..market is going to crash in the next 18 months&quot;   from mano1963.<br/><br/>If this is your rational for going short now, then I'm going 100% long !]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What's Ahead For U.S. Interest Rates?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1380121/comments?source=feed#comment-18210551</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18210551</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I started buying treasuries a little more than a month ago for one reason only:<br/>I assumed the stock market was ripe for a correction and treasury prices would increase with the assumed downturn in stocks.  I planned to  keep the treasuries only for the length of the stock downturn as a hedge for my stock portfolio.  Well, it worked out better than I assumed even though equities have not corrected.   This brings up the decision whether to keep the treasuries if stocks continue their rise.  If I feel the economy will get stronger I will sell the treasuries immediately.   I don't know how long this situation will continue where stocks continue rising along with treasury prices.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:57:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I started buying treasuries a little more than a month ago for one reason only:<br/>I assumed the stock market was ripe for a correction and treasury prices would increase with the assumed downturn in stocks.  I planned to  keep the treasuries only for the length of the stock downturn as a hedge for my stock portfolio.  Well, it worked out better than I assumed even though equities have not corrected.   This brings up the decision whether to keep the treasuries if stocks continue their rise.  If I feel the economy will get stronger I will sell the treasuries immediately.   I don't know how long this situation will continue where stocks continue rising along with treasury prices.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Secular Bull Market Continues</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1379001/comments?source=feed#comment-18199041</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18199041</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[We never got to the lows in P/E ratios that we got at other major stock market bottoms where a secular bull commenced.  Also as others have pointed out - how much lower can interest rates go ?<br/>I vote for a continuation of the secular bear.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 16:07:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[We never got to the lows in P/E ratios that we got at other major stock market bottoms where a secular bull commenced.  Also as others have pointed out - how much lower can interest rates go ?<br/>I vote for a continuation of the secular bear.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This Summer Slowdown Will Be Different Than The Previous 3</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1379551/comments?source=feed#comment-18191431</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18191431</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[As far as jobs are concerned, why would any company with say 49 employees hire one more and then get hit with the $3,000 per employee Obamacare costs ?   Conversely, why would a company with 52 employees not fire three to get under the Obamacare 50 employee limit ?<br/>This coupled with on average 60 new govt. regulations per day impacting businesses and I wonder if our bigger government is what is really standing in the way of further growth in our economy. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 11:54:15 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[As far as jobs are concerned, why would any company with say 49 employees hire one more and then get hit with the $3,000 per employee Obamacare costs ?   Conversely, why would a company with 52 employees not fire three to get under the Obamacare 50 employee limit ?<br/>This coupled with on average 60 new govt. regulations per day impacting businesses and I wonder if our bigger government is what is really standing in the way of further growth in our economy. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What's Wrong With This Picture?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1370571/comments?source=feed#comment-18092131</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18092131</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I differ - the bull continues.   Too much pessimism for a top.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 14:26:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I differ - the bull continues.   Too much pessimism for a top.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Valuations Support 1% Or Less For U.S. Stocks Over Next 20 Years</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1344831/comments?source=feed#comment-17736221</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17736221</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I realize the following calculations are idealized but they pertain to the mindset of dividend growth investors and show another way to increase the growth of a portfolio significantly over what the author suggests.<br/>Assuming a portfolio of dividend growth stocks with an starting yield of 3% and an average growth of dividends of 8% (which is relatively easy to accomplish), the annual yield on cost of dividends for this portfolio after 10 years would be approximately 6.5%.   For 15 years: 9.5% per year, and for 20 years the portfolio would yield 14% annually.   This assumes no increase in share prices during this period.<br/>These calculations do have some assumptions included but serious dividend growth investors can achieve these results.  So it shows that non-speculative investing can beat out many other investment strategies.  In my view this is the primary way a stock market investor should invest.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 11:09:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I realize the following calculations are idealized but they pertain to the mindset of dividend growth investors and show another way to increase the growth of a portfolio significantly over what the author suggests.<br/>Assuming a portfolio of dividend growth stocks with an starting yield of 3% and an average growth of dividends of 8% (which is relatively easy to accomplish), the annual yield on cost of dividends for this portfolio after 10 years would be approximately 6.5%.   For 15 years: 9.5% per year, and for 20 years the portfolio would yield 14% annually.   This assumes no increase in share prices during this period.<br/>These calculations do have some assumptions included but serious dividend growth investors can achieve these results.  So it shows that non-speculative investing can beat out many other investment strategies.  In my view this is the primary way a stock market investor should invest.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Does Momentum Investing Actually Work?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1336291/comments?source=feed#comment-17526291</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17526291</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Not meaning to be an advertisement, but NoLoad FundX has been using a momentum strategy for years in their recommendations of funds and it works great - except for '08 - '09, when their recommendations were crushed like everything else.<br/>They employ the formula using returns:  (1mo + 3mo + 6mo + 12mo) / 4.     They compare all funds in various classes using this algorithm.   Note that the algorithm automatically weighs the more recent returns in calculating the comparison value.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:34:19 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Not meaning to be an advertisement, but NoLoad FundX has been using a momentum strategy for years in their recommendations of funds and it works great - except for '08 - '09, when their recommendations were crushed like everything else.<br/>They employ the formula using returns:  (1mo + 3mo + 6mo + 12mo) / 4.     They compare all funds in various classes using this algorithm.   Note that the algorithm automatically weighs the more recent returns in calculating the comparison value.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chuy's - Priced Beyond Perfection</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1335231/comments?source=feed#comment-17525901</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17525901</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I sold my last shares in Chuy's today.   I bought my shares at an average of 17.5.   I might buy again during a correction.<br/>The Chuy's store near my home is so busy I was only able to go once to try it out.   You have to go before 4:30 PM and pray you get to be seated.   The main items (tacos, enchiladas, etc) are very good, the five salsas - outstanding.   The beans &amp; rice - not so good; Abuelo's beats them in the beans &amp; rice area.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:17:05 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I sold my last shares in Chuy's today.   I bought my shares at an average of 17.5.   I might buy again during a correction.<br/>The Chuy's store near my home is so busy I was only able to go once to try it out.   You have to go before 4:30 PM and pray you get to be seated.   The main items (tacos, enchiladas, etc) are very good, the five salsas - outstanding.   The beans &amp; rice - not so good; Abuelo's beats them in the beans &amp; rice area.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Even The Bulls Are Becoming Wary: Can We Trust The Market Any Longer?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1329751/comments?source=feed#comment-17405371</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17405371</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Joseph,<br/>I agree with most of your ideas about the status and near-term future  performance of the markets.   However I'm not sure why you selected the bond ETF, BND, to represent the treasury market.   BND is not a pure play for treasuries since over 25% of the fund consists of mortgage backed securities.   In addition 13% are in industrial bonds.<br/>I believe a better choice are the pure treasury ETFs such as IEF, TLH, and TLT.   Two of those, IEF &amp; TLH, I have bought recently and I'll probably add more to my portfolio if there is any weakness.  They have dramatically outperformed BND in the last month since the start of the treasury rally. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 12:14:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Joseph,<br/>I agree with most of your ideas about the status and near-term future  performance of the markets.   However I'm not sure why you selected the bond ETF, BND, to represent the treasury market.   BND is not a pure play for treasuries since over 25% of the fund consists of mortgage backed securities.   In addition 13% are in industrial bonds.<br/>I believe a better choice are the pure treasury ETFs such as IEF, TLH, and TLT.   Two of those, IEF &amp; TLH, I have bought recently and I'll probably add more to my portfolio if there is any weakness.  They have dramatically outperformed BND in the last month since the start of the treasury rally. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>10-Year Treasury Yield Breaks Uptrend</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1323321/comments?source=feed#comment-17292871</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17292871</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I can't believe anyone would short the treasury market in the last month with a stock market correction looming.   I&quot;ve been buying treasuries with a vengence for the last month.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 23:12:30 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I can't believe anyone would short the treasury market in the last month with a stock market correction looming.   I&quot;ve been buying treasuries with a vengence for the last month.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fixed Income Momentum - April 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1314081/comments?source=feed#comment-17159791</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17159791</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[NoLoad FundX uses as similar strategy to extremebanker's method.  I think I will run some scenarios over his &amp; the authors to see what is best for my style.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:43:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[NoLoad FundX uses as similar strategy to extremebanker's method.  I think I will run some scenarios over his &amp; the authors to see what is best for my style.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Case For Treasuries Strengthens</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1311481/comments?source=feed#comment-17079611</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17079611</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[ExBiggie &amp; Warren B.,<br/>I agree with you if you hold them now for the long term, but if you use them as trading / hedging vehicles as I and many others do, they are excellent.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 14:25:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[ExBiggie &amp; Warren B.,<br/>I agree with you if you hold them now for the long term, but if you use them as trading / hedging vehicles as I and many others do, they are excellent.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cash Is Not King</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1287711/comments?source=feed#comment-16529351</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16529351</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I'm getting that sinking feeling that now is the time to increase cash holdings, which usually means I'm wrong.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 00:00:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I'm getting that sinking feeling that now is the time to increase cash holdings, which usually means I'm wrong.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Often Does S&amp;P 500 Have 10% And 20% Negative Price Moves?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1287761/comments?source=feed#comment-16528201</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16528201</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Excellent way to present the volatility the markets have generated since the early 80s.  You don't have to wait too long to buy low.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 23:36:12 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Excellent way to present the volatility the markets have generated since the early 80s.  You don't have to wait too long to buy low.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is It Too Late To Ride The Stock Rally?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1136501/comments?source=feed#comment-14258321</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14258321</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Excellent article with a lot of actionable information.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:25:03 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Excellent article with a lot of actionable information.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Goldman Sachs Is A Phenomenal Investment Opportunity</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1116771/comments?source=feed#comment-13820981</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13820981</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[vmirage:   &quot;...one of the most vile companies in the world&quot;.<br/><br/>I hope you don't have any tobacco or defense stocks.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:33:02 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[vmirage:   &quot;...one of the most vile companies in the world&quot;.<br/><br/>I hope you don't have any tobacco or defense stocks.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Optimizing Returns By Selling Overvalued Companies</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1116371/comments?source=feed#comment-13802241</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13802241</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[There's nothing wrong about taking a profit after a significant run for a stock, however a major factor for me is whether the stock is overvalued or not.  I also had ATT last year and sold my complete position at around $35/share.  What prompted me to sell all of my shares was that I felt T was overvalued.  I use F.A.S.T. Graphs to determine this.  In this case T peaked out at 38 last year but I did make a sizable return on my investment.    Examining the F.A.S.T. Graph's analysis it seemed T usually corrects at somewhat of a higher level of overvaluation than I sold at, so I guess I should have sold a 1/2 position and wait and see if it would go higher to sell the rest.<br/>I put the proceeds into Aflac (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/afl' title='AFLAC Incorporated'>AFL</a>) which was substantially undervalued as displayed in the FAST graph analysis for this stock.<br/>From now on I plan to examine all my div. growth stocks on a weekly basis and perform the above analysis to decide whether to hold or sell after a sizable gain.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 19:48:39 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[There's nothing wrong about taking a profit after a significant run for a stock, however a major factor for me is whether the stock is overvalued or not.  I also had ATT last year and sold my complete position at around $35/share.  What prompted me to sell all of my shares was that I felt T was overvalued.  I use F.A.S.T. Graphs to determine this.  In this case T peaked out at 38 last year but I did make a sizable return on my investment.    Examining the F.A.S.T. Graph's analysis it seemed T usually corrects at somewhat of a higher level of overvaluation than I sold at, so I guess I should have sold a 1/2 position and wait and see if it would go higher to sell the rest.<br/>I put the proceeds into Aflac (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/afl' title='AFLAC Incorporated'>AFL</a>) which was substantially undervalued as displayed in the FAST graph analysis for this stock.<br/>From now on I plan to examine all my div. growth stocks on a weekly basis and perform the above analysis to decide whether to hold or sell after a sizable gain.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
