The top 100 stock
market authors
selected for publication
market authors
selected for publication
User 283977
»
Comments
» AAPL
You are currently following User 283977
Stop FollowingYou are no longer following User 283977
-
500
)
Apple Beats, Shares Jump [View article]
Mad Money: The Smartphone Revolution Continues [View article]
Candidates to Replace GM, Citigroup in the Dow [View article]
If all they want to do is to make a substitution, I would replace GM with a steel company like Nucor (NUE) or US Steel (X). While I was at it I would also remove City (C) and replace it with Wells Fargo (WFC) or Bank of America (BAC).
As to the effect of the replacements on the Index valuation, remember it’s a 'scaled' average. So when replacements are made, they change the scaling.
If they really want the Dow Index to be representative, then they need to consult with a technical expert that is an expert in the design of representative Indexes.
The Browser Battle: How Relevant Is Security? [View article]
Should Google Be Paying a Dividend? [View article]
Lack of a dividend is one of the reasons I have not expanded my ownership of Google... why should I give them any more of my money when there is little likelihood the stock is going to be growing in this kind of an economic environment. The exact same logic applies to ALL so called "growth" stocks.
Dell Gets Ready for a Comeback - Barron's [View article]
Apple's Jobs Takes Medical Leave; Back in Summer for WWDC? [View article]
It’s sad that this very private man, this hero of the personal computer revolution is now going to be subjected to having his personal health turned into a media circus by a group of rapacious legal hyenas.
This is one investor that only wishes the best of luck to Steve and his family in this difficult time. If I loose some money, its only money. What our society has gained because of this man's contributions is immeasurable.
Why I'm Selling Apple and Google Today - and Holding Amazon [View article]
I agree with the Authors decision to sell Apple and Google. They are great stocks, but given the current market conditions, I think they are mostly going to be moving sideways. And yes, Apple is going to be putting out some more insanely great products. However, I suspect people are in a cash conserving mode, and they will put off purchases of things they really don't need until they feel safer with respect to their economic prospects. I have two G4s that I want to replace, but I am waiting. Amazon appears to be at a support level, and the next support level is around $75. I see more downside potential than upside for Amazon in the next six months. So I would wait.
The perception of Apple, Google, or Amazon being currently cheep is based on their market valuation during a large speculative bubble. It took many years for that bubble to form. Ruminations that Google is going to be back at $500 to $600 at the end of 2009 do not seem realistic. Yet if you look at the current S&P projected year end price of Google, its $500…. Of course, S&P provide no method for their projections. This leaves the investor to wonder if the projection is valid, or if S&P is touting the stock….
Is Apple the Beacon of Light In This Dreary Recession? [View article]
Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [View article]
Is Apple the Beacon of Light In This Dreary Recession? [View article]
I totally agree that Apple will continue to generate new and better designs and constantly superior brand experiences. However, if this was all that drove their stock price, we would not have seen it drop from $170 in September to less than $90 now. So irrespective of superior designs and customer experiences, Apple's stock has dropped 47%. If you chart Apple and Dell, their stock prices have moved in a similar fashion. This does not mean that Apple and Dell's products are similar, it just means that during the melt-down both companies stocks moved downward at a similar rate.
So the question is, will Apple's stock price increase, go sideways or decrease in the next six months? I don't see any reason for its stock price to significantly increase, but I see a lot of reasons why it would go sideways or even decrease a bit. IT budgets in businesses are way down, and people are spending less too.
By the way, I am long on AAPL, and have been a Mac user since the beginning back in 1984. It is a great company, but in today's financial environment, I think investors need to be thinking dividend yields. I suggest putting Apple, and stocks like it in a wait and see category and put you investment money into solid stocks that offer good dividends. That way your money works for you while we wait for a recovery.
Cramer's Mad Money - Is Cerberus a Hero or a Dog (12/23/08) [View article]
The Wall Street Journal is one of the primary mouth pieces for the big moneyed investment firms. Their praise of Cerberus for "risking its capital" to buy Chrysler clearly demonstrates their biased perspective. They make it sound like Cerberus "rescued" Chrysler because they are great guys and therefore deserve access to taxpayers money. However, you can be sure that Cerberus acted in its own self interests in the matter. They made a quick short-term profit, but now they face the long-term consequences of their bad deal.
Chrysler is owned by Cerberus. Therefore, tax payer money would be going to Cerberus. I don't believe Cerberus is qualified to receive tax payer money… These greedy dogs are just scratching at the door for handouts…
Cramer's Stop Trading! Goldman Has Nothing Better to Do (12/15/08) [View article]
Moody's cuts Goldman ratings to A1 from Aa3
Cramer's Stop Trading! Goldman Has Nothing Better to Do (12/15/08) [View article]
If you know a company is strong, and the market follows your downgrades, then certain actions on the part of Goldman and perhaps a few "blue horseshoe" friends should be detectable.
I can think of several ways they could they make big money by providing disingenuous ratings…. How do you think it could be done, and how could this get by the SEC?
Yahoo Needs an Experienced Brawler [View article]