And any word from Macquarie? It appears that they haven't said anything since the WUTC order or the expiration of reconsideration deadline before the WUTC.
They way I read the WUTC's order, PC would have had to move for a stay within a request for reconsideration which it did not do. The filing of an appeal in the circuit thus could not operate as a stay. Also PC's statement after the WUTC order did not sound like a party intent on appealing which it did not at least before the WUTC.
If the deal doesn't close before 1/21/09 then does not PSD have to pay .25 dividend?
-
And any word from Macquarie? It appears that they haven't said anything since the WUTC order or the expiration of reconsideration deadline before the WUTC.
Jan 13 11:35 am
|Rating:
0
0
All Comments by mwm711 »Merger Review: Puget Energy [View article]
They way I read the WUTC's order, PC would have had to move for a stay within a request for reconsideration which it did not do. The filing of an appeal in the circuit thus could not operate as a stay. Also PC's statement after the WUTC order did not sound like a party intent on appealing which it did not at least before the WUTC.
If the deal doesn't close before 1/21/09 then does not PSD have to pay .25 dividend?