Gdub53

What's Next for Gold and the Dollar?

you are 100% spot on


On Oct 14 01:17 PM Stepbear7 wrote:

> The only external sources the US is borrowing from is the scam cartel
> Federal Reserve System. We've already seen what kind of ride this
> country has had since the Federal Reserve Act(December 23, 1913)
> has been around.
> Currency is already and will continue to collapse as long as the
> Federal Reserve and fractional reserve banking continues to be aloud.
>
> The Rothschilds of London and Berlin,Lazard Brothers of Paris,Kuhn
> Loeb Co., and Warburgs of Germany, and Rockefeller families of New
> York are and continue to be pleased with the control they have over
> you and your shares and stocks because they own all of them.
>
> Accept This As The Truth The Whole Truth & Nothing But The
> Truth
>
>
> You people still don't get it.
> The Central banks along with the Federal Reserve, Fractional reserve
> banking procedures, and absence of the Gold standard are the spring
> boards of happiness for these cartel counterfeiters to rake the entire
> world over the coals and out of existence.
> Federal Reserve Notes are near extinction. Rightfully so, because
> they(seekingalpha.com/symbo...) are worthless paper not
> soft enough for biological purposes and have no value without Gold
> standard backing it.
> The rest of the world is starting to realize the USD (Federal Reserve
> Note) is the ROOT CAUSE OF PRESENT GLOBAL CHAOS.
> Use the Gold Standard and get rid of Federal Reserve Notes and start
> having the U.S Government Treasury print United States Notes backed
> by gold reserves only producing allotments as needed to balance
> goods and services.
>
> Abolish the Federal Reserve Act of 1913,Fractional Reserve Banking,
> the IRS, Ben Bernanke and the entire Federal Reserve System.
> Then you will be able to understand and open your mind and eyes and
> move on to a better economic level of survival.
> In other words remove 96 years of bend over vaseline jobs from the
> Federal Reserve System.
> Just a thought ............. Have a good day,week,month,year and
> next decade.
>
>
> Stepbear7

Housing Bubble, The Sequel

there is no such word as "irregardless"...

Why Banks Prefer Foreclosures over Mortgage Modifications

Remember folks all money is created as DEBT. Out of thin air!!!

Why Banks Prefer Foreclosures over Mortgage Modifications

Let's look at it another way. The bank created the money out of thin air. Nothing at risk. Not your neighbor's savings. They get the property, i.e., the money. NOTHING AT RISK. Meanwhile they collected the interest and now they get the house. All the while with no skin in the game. Sound fair? I suggest that's why they prefer foreclosure.

Crude Prices Up, But Gas Prices Are Down

gas prices ARE NOT down

Madoff's Investors Don't Deserve Compensation or Sympathy

you people blow my mind...go to the USA Today website and read the letters to the judge...not all were rich, foolish perhaps.

Debt, Debt, and More Debt in Store for the U.S.

"The Moneymasters" google video. Says it all.

The Price of Debt, And the Ultimate Cost

Begin by abolishing Federal Reserve, their collection agency (IRS) and the income tax. Gone will be the evil perps of this debacle. No more fractional banking, no more gov't terror, no more funny money.

Who Is Really to Blame for the Deficit?

All of you smart people out there..and for the most part yes smart, just don't get it. Until Federal Reserve is abolished and the fractional banking system done away with we are and will be toast.

Can the U.S. Break the Oligarchy Cycle a Fourth Time?

nothing will change unless Federal Reserve is abolished

The Worst Case Scenario (Someone Has to Say It)

watch the Moneymasters on google video. Then restate your garbage about the FED, fractional banking, and their collection agency, the IRS.


On May 03 06:13 PM john1940 wrote:

> Let me try to help just a few of the responders on just one issue.
> The Federal Reserve is not a private bank. It's a bank created by
> federal law and designed for independence in it's action. There
> are 12 member banks that take care of Federal Reserve responsibilities
> in designated sections of the country. It is audited regularly and
> monitored by Congress. Profits go to the federal government. Go
> to www.federalreserve.gov... for a
> start on FRB. Then try Wikipedia. Stay out of the internet and
> blogs for information. A lot of internet sources are good but most
> of America's poorly educated can't differentiate nonsense from fact.
>
>
> Lastly, I'm not leaving the USA but I am worried about it's future.
> I don't think the predictions are that good but some of it may occur
> in some smaller dosage. The future of our country is very bleak.

Bernanke's Casual Comments on 'Printing Money' and Inflation

well said ! ! Then we get rid of the income tax and the IRS


On Mar 17 09:02 AM Lavalson wrote:

> The Federal Reserve Bank is a Private Bank. It creates money out
> of thin air and loans it to the Government and the banks and charges
> interest on the loan. The loan is then payed back plus interest to
> the Federal Reserve Bank even though the money never existed before
> it was loaned. And let's not forget that we are talking about a PRIVATE
> BANK which is making billions of dollars in profit with money that
> they not only did not have but created instantly. When will the American
> people wake up and abolish the FRB? If the government can issue bonds
> it can issue its own money and stop this nonsense and therefore eliminate
> the national debt in virtually no time.

Increasing Tax Share vs. Income Share Gap

the saying goes...figures DON'T lie, but liars sure do figure.


On Mar 13 11:30 AM John Lounsbury wrote:

> Mark - - -
>
> I am disappointed at the misleading nature of this article.
>
> Your graph leads the reader to the conclusion that the top 1% of
> incomes pay a higher tax burden in 2006 compared to 1986. You also
> imply that in your statement:
>
> <"The chart shows that the difference between the top <1%'s tax
> share (about 25% in the late 1980s) and the <that group's income
> share (about 14% in the late <1980s), which increased from 11% in
> the earlier period <to 18% by 2006, when the tax share had increased
> to <about 40% for the top 1% compared to that group's <income share
> of 22%. Stated differently, the income <share of the top 1% increased
> by about .55% per year <from 1986 to 2006, compared to the tax share
> of the <top 1%, which increased by about .75% per year."
>
> The fallacy of your statement and implication can be easily seen
> with the following calculation:
>
> In 1986-87, for every $1,000 of income, the top 1% received $110.
> In 2006, the top 1% received $220. The top 1% income increased by
> 100%.
>
> In 1986-87, for every $1,000 of taxes, the top 1% paid $250. In
> 2006, the top 1% paid $400. The top 1% taxes increased by 60%.<br/>
>
> This represents a significant lessening of the tax burden of the
> top 1% over the 20 year period.
>
> There is an old saying that "figures lie and liars figure". As an
> educator, you should be more careful in how you use numbers.
>

Why It's Actually Different This Time

You are the pathetic one...


On Mar 12 09:06 AM Oquichtli wrote:

> Pathetic fear mongering. You should be punished to the for spouting
> such fear. I know, fear sells papers and gets fools to read pathetic
> blogs like yours. Why don't you inform the dumb masses how to profit
> in this environment(i.e. highly volatile markets make fortunes for
> options trading) instead of scaring the hell out of their weak minds?
> Oh I know why, you are protecting the business agenda of the masters
> who own you. Just like that fool Ron Paul. Trying to scare the zombie
> sheep. You all should be put to justice.

Rethinking Fractional Banking

For the first time a majority of the comments are spot on..abolish Federal Reserve, fractional banking and their collection agency, the IRS.