Gdub53

Debt, Debt, and More Debt in Store for the U.S.

"The Moneymasters" google video. Says it all.

Who Is Really to Blame for the Deficit?

All of you smart people out there..and for the most part yes smart, just don't get it. Until Federal Reserve is abolished and the fractional banking system done away with we are and will be toast.

The Worst Case Scenario (Someone Has to Say It)

watch the Moneymasters on google video. Then restate your garbage about the FED, fractional banking, and their collection agency, the IRS.


On May 03 06:13 PM john1940 wrote:

> Let me try to help just a few of the responders on just one issue.
> The Federal Reserve is not a private bank. It's a bank created by
> federal law and designed for independence in it's action. There
> are 12 member banks that take care of Federal Reserve responsibilities
> in designated sections of the country. It is audited regularly and
> monitored by Congress. Profits go to the federal government. Go
> to www.federalreserve.gov... for a
> start on FRB. Then try Wikipedia. Stay out of the internet and
> blogs for information. A lot of internet sources are good but most
> of America's poorly educated can't differentiate nonsense from fact.
>
>
> Lastly, I'm not leaving the USA but I am worried about it's future.
> I don't think the predictions are that good but some of it may occur
> in some smaller dosage. The future of our country is very bleak.

Increasing Tax Share vs. Income Share Gap

the saying goes...figures DON'T lie, but liars sure do figure.


On Mar 13 11:30 AM John Lounsbury wrote:

> Mark - - -
>
> I am disappointed at the misleading nature of this article.
>
> Your graph leads the reader to the conclusion that the top 1% of
> incomes pay a higher tax burden in 2006 compared to 1986. You also
> imply that in your statement:
>
> <"The chart shows that the difference between the top <1%'s tax
> share (about 25% in the late 1980s) and the <that group's income
> share (about 14% in the late <1980s), which increased from 11% in
> the earlier period <to 18% by 2006, when the tax share had increased
> to <about 40% for the top 1% compared to that group's <income share
> of 22%. Stated differently, the income <share of the top 1% increased
> by about .55% per year <from 1986 to 2006, compared to the tax share
> of the <top 1%, which increased by about .75% per year."
>
> The fallacy of your statement and implication can be easily seen
> with the following calculation:
>
> In 1986-87, for every $1,000 of income, the top 1% received $110.
> In 2006, the top 1% received $220. The top 1% income increased by
> 100%.
>
> In 1986-87, for every $1,000 of taxes, the top 1% paid $250. In
> 2006, the top 1% paid $400. The top 1% taxes increased by 60%.<br/>
>
> This represents a significant lessening of the tax burden of the
> top 1% over the 20 year period.
>
> There is an old saying that "figures lie and liars figure". As an
> educator, you should be more careful in how you use numbers.
>

Why It's Actually Different This Time

You are the pathetic one...


On Mar 12 09:06 AM Oquichtli wrote:

> Pathetic fear mongering. You should be punished to the for spouting
> such fear. I know, fear sells papers and gets fools to read pathetic
> blogs like yours. Why don't you inform the dumb masses how to profit
> in this environment(i.e. highly volatile markets make fortunes for
> options trading) instead of scaring the hell out of their weak minds?
> Oh I know why, you are protecting the business agenda of the masters
> who own you. Just like that fool Ron Paul. Trying to scare the zombie
> sheep. You all should be put to justice.

Ray Dalio: A Long and Painful Depression - Barron's Interview

Abolish Federal Reserve. End the fractional reserve banking system. Abolish the IRS. Don't you people get it? The more money printed by this private banking cartel the more interest they collect. Don't you people realize that all the income tax does is pay this cartel their interest for the money that's created out of thin air? What a scam. More money = more interest. Google video..."The Moneymasters".

The Hopefully Not So Great Next Depression

abolish Federal Reserve and the fractional banking scam. Then abolish their collection agency, the IRS.

8 Important Facts About the Federal Reserve

just go to google videos..."The Moneymasters"


On Jan 18 10:48 AM bobomite wrote:

> The debt-based economic model that we use today was evolved in the
> 1800s. The long-term effects of bringing money into existence as
> debt without creating the money to pay interest have taken many years
> to fully understand. There is nothing sacred about our system; it
> is just what we are used to.
>
> Mathematically, our financial system will implode eventually. This
> will provide the opportunity to re-learn that these systems can be
> built however we choose.
>
> The first crucial step is that enough people need to actually take
> an effort to understand what money is and how our financial systems
> actually work. The current downturn is certainly encouraging people
> to begin that education.
>
> This article is in a great example of that process in action.

Orwellian Finance: Is 1984 Happening in 2009?

It all started in 1913 with the creation of Federal Reserve...no more federal than Federal Express. Abolish them and their collection agency, the IRS. Google video..."The Moneymasters" Educate yourselves.

A Depression and Recovery in Internet Time

and not one of you even mentions the culprit in this mess...the privately held banking cartel aka Federal Reserve. Money out of debt? Abolish Federal Reserve. Google video.."The Moneymasters". Educate yourselves.

Excessive Systemic Debt: The Primary Cause of Our Current Crisis

Just abolish the private banking cartel, i.e., Federal Reserve. Google video; The moneymasters

The Shallowest Generation

Simple solution...abolish Federal Reserve. Watch "the money masters"..google video