Unwise to Tax the Rich to Pay for Health Care [View article]
So, William, your proposal to address the crisis of 50 million uninsured Americans is:
1. Do nothing, the status quo is fine; or
2. ______________?
Just curious.
On Jul 16 02:29 PM User 449150 wrote:
> So many bizarre comments here about the 'rich' not paying enough > in taxes. The figures are available for anyone who cares to read > them. They are well known by now. The top 5% of earners in the > US pay over 50% of the federal tax burden. The top 10% of earners > pay over 70% of federal taxes. But the figure I find most grotesque > is this: the bottom 50% of earners in the US pay nearly no federal > taxes (actual figure around 4%). Half of working Americans are enjoying > the benefits of a federal bureaucracy but pay nothing into it (in > fact, many of these people enjoy negative taxes through the earned > income tax credit). So now the brilliant solution from a democratic > congress is to further skew this unfair policy? And of course, one > thing can be sure. Once a health care subsidy tax is implemented, > it will only go up as the system heads towards insolvency (probably > within 5 years). Then what? > > William Quigley
-
So, William, your proposal to address the crisis of 50 million uninsured Americans is:
Jul 16 14:46 pm
|Rating:
+2
-3
All Comments by LeoTheDog »Unwise to Tax the Rich to Pay for Health Care [View article]
1. Do nothing, the status quo is fine; or
2. ______________?
Just curious.
On Jul 16 02:29 PM User 449150 wrote:
> So many bizarre comments here about the 'rich' not paying enough
> in taxes. The figures are available for anyone who cares to read
> them. They are well known by now. The top 5% of earners in the
> US pay over 50% of the federal tax burden. The top 10% of earners
> pay over 70% of federal taxes. But the figure I find most grotesque
> is this: the bottom 50% of earners in the US pay nearly no federal
> taxes (actual figure around 4%). Half of working Americans are enjoying
> the benefits of a federal bureaucracy but pay nothing into it (in
> fact, many of these people enjoy negative taxes through the earned
> income tax credit). So now the brilliant solution from a democratic
> congress is to further skew this unfair policy? And of course, one
> thing can be sure. Once a health care subsidy tax is implemented,
> it will only go up as the system heads towards insolvency (probably
> within 5 years). Then what?
>
> William Quigley