The S&P may have been flat over the past 10-11 years, but someone holding blue-chip dividend paying stocks over that time period would have achieved an annualised growth of +5.4%. Not everyone owns a S&P 500 index fund.
On Sep 22 06:24 PM SeekingTruth wrote:
> D4L, Thanks for some solid and useful data and suggestions. MadHFT
> It is worth recognizing that the S&P 500 is at a level first > seen in Feb. 1998, more than 11 years ago. i.e. Flat for over 11 > years on a growth basis for buy and hold investors. > Message : Don't buy and hold mindlessly, even better dividend paying > stocks should be let go when overvalued, but only with great caution > and care with the mind and strategy to buy them back along the way, > or to improve and update your selections.. > Again thanks for a good and useful article , you do us an excellent > service, also MadMFT.
-
The S&P may have been flat over the past 10-11 years, but someone holding blue-chip dividend paying stocks over that time period would have achieved an annualised growth of +5.4%. Not everyone owns a S&P 500 index fund.
Sep 22 20:14 pm
|Rating:
+5
0
All Comments by Teak »Getting Ready for Retirement [View article]
On Sep 22 06:24 PM SeekingTruth wrote:
> D4L, Thanks for some solid and useful data and suggestions. MadHFT
> It is worth recognizing that the S&P 500 is at a level first
> seen in Feb. 1998, more than 11 years ago. i.e. Flat for over 11
> years on a growth basis for buy and hold investors.
> Message : Don't buy and hold mindlessly, even better dividend paying
> stocks should be let go when overvalued, but only with great caution
> and care with the mind and strategy to buy them back along the way,
> or to improve and update your selections..
> Again thanks for a good and useful article , you do us an excellent
> service, also MadMFT.