Please note that I do not read comments posted here, nor respond to messages here. I don't have the time. If you want my attention, you must seek it directly at my blog.
Aswath Damodaran is the Kerschner Family Chair Professor of Finance at the Stern School of Business at New York University. He teaches the corporate finance and equity valuation courses in the MBA program. He received his MBA and Ph.D from the University of California at Los Angeles. His research interests lie in valuation, portfolio management and applied corporate finance.
He has written three books on equity valuation (Damodaran on Valuation, Investment Valuation, The Dark Side of Valuation) and two on corporate finance (Corporate Finance: Theory and Practice, Applied Corporate Finance: A User’s Manual). He has co-edited a book on investment management with Peter Bernstein (Investment Management) and has a book on investment philosophies (Investment Philosophies). His newest book on portfolio management is titled Investment Fables and was released in 2004. His latest book is on the relationship between risk and value, and takes a big picture view of how businesses should deal with risk, and was published in 2007.
He was a visiting lecturer at the University of California, Berkeley, from 1984 to 1986, where he received the Earl Cheit Outstanding Teaching Award in 1985. He has been at NYU since 1986, received the Stern School of Business Excellence in Teaching Award (awarded by the graduating class) in 1988, 1991, 1992, 1999, 2001, 2007, 2008 and 2009, and was the youngest winner of the University-wide Distinguished Teaching Award (in 1990). He was profiled in Business Week as one of the top twelve business school professors in the United States in 1994.
Editors' Note: Seeking Alpha monitors Dr. Damodaran blog and posts relevant articles on his behalf.
Wall Street Breakfast, Seeking Alpha's flagship daily business news summary, is a one-page summary that gives you a rapid overview of the day's key financial news. It's designed for easy readability on the site or by email (including on mobile devices), and is published before 7:00 AM ET every market day.
Wall Street Breakfast readership of over 900,000 includes many from the investment-banking and fund-management industries.
Sign up here to receive the Wall Street Breakfast in your inbox every business day: http://seekingalpha.com/account/email_preferences
Jennifer's areas of expertise include energy trends —their economic and geopolitical implications—and resource sustainability issues. Other interests include shale oil and natural gas, climate change, green and efficient infrastructure, China, India, and the energy-water nexus.
Her work has been published in various academic, policy and business publications such as Far Eastern Economic Review, Economist Intelligence Unit’s Executive Briefing, Journal of Structured Finance, Lloyd's List, D CEO, Energy Trends Insider, Financial Sense, and many others. She has been interviewed for numerous radio broadcasts and news stories, and presented her work at various conferences. From Dec 2010 to April 2013, she was the CEO/President of a global affairs organization focused on cutting edge trends. She organized and moderated panels on global gas, energy security, energy infrastructure finance, and urban development.
She has a master's degree from London School of Economics, and bachelor's in finance/marketing. She is principal of Concept Elemental, a strategic communications consultancy focusing on knowledge work, and includes over fifteen years of financial services industry work. She works with a top University, "translating" cutting edge research as well.
I have my MBA from Rotman School of Management, and I have over 5 years of personal trading experience in both China and Canada. I'm interested in value investing and find companies that have easy to understand business model, sustainable earnings growth and qualified management. I also conduct rigorous DCF-analysis, making reasonable assumptions to identify undervalued stocks.
My prior sales experience allows me to understand the latest technology and consumer trends and I hope to share my unique views with readers through Seeking Alpha.
Copperfield Research is the pseudonym of a research team focusing on publicly traded equities. As of the publication date of our articles, we may have long or short equity positions in the companies covered. We do not discuss unpublished reports, or provide any advanced warning of future reports to others. Due to the danger of retaliation, our reports are written under a pseudonym. Please read our Disclaimer on the front page of every opinion piece before reading any of the material.
I am an individual, self-taught investor with a Masters in Economics. I like playing with data and mostly focus on finding companies that are undervalued and provide good opportunities for investment, but at times will also look into high growth companies with compelling stories despite their valuations.Please note that I am not a professional financial adviser and anything I write or post is not professional investment advice. You must always do your own research or consult your financial adviser before investing.
Residing in Colorado Springs, Colorado.
Has been trading and coaching using a self-developed option trading system for 10 years. Philosophically conservative, accurately trades weekly options with a strong risk management approach.
Well sought after by investors around the world, he teaches a minimum and hand-selected number of students each quarter how to trade his system.
Besides investing his interests are: Acoustic Guitar, Kayaking, Mountain Biking
No Body. No Bio.
First of all, I am personally inclined to think ten-year US bonds would be a safe play in 2016 in contrary to most professionals' collective opinion that the expectation in yields to rise would bring down bond price, while the best place to put one's money would be the US equities market. Partially I agree, to the extend there is going to be a continued and heightened merger-mania and buyback programs for tax purposes and so, buying large US pharmaceutical and cable companies would be the way to go. However, US bonds have its merits in 2016 as I shall elaborate below.
2016 is going to be an interesting year. There are three different highly probable scenarios and I wonder which is going to play out.
Assuming oil is a critical variable. According to James Conca, Saudi Arabia can bear to sell at $15/barrel without going bankrupt. As the US tries to break from the oil addiction, it is only natural for Saudi Arabia to lower the prices to force the US oil producers to bankruptcy.
Saudi Arabia – $21/bbl
Middle East – $24/bbl
North Dakota – $40/bbl
From the above figure, this is a war lost, except the US congress lifted America's 40-year-old ban on oil exports in presumably an attempt to save domestic oil industry. An unattended consequence would be, the Fed would not be as free as otherwise to bring up the rate in 2016 as that would upset the bond market in which oil producers have a large percentage of financing. Some argue that even when US oil producers' hedging contracts continue to expire into the end of 2016, the US wells will still be there, the fracking technology and infrastructure will still be there, large US energy firms will mop them up on the cheap. The objective of the Saudi Arabia will be achieved regardless whether the latter happens.
Oil price's implication on US bond yield will ultimately affect Chinese yuan, as the Fed will be reluctant to raise the rates and when does, raises it slowly, People's Bank of China will lower its interest rates and possibly reserve ratio. If PBC does it too mildly, it would not be able to save its metal and real estate industries- its bond market would unavoidably be in dire shape, if PBC does it too much, yuan would devalue enough to boost export however a large outflow of capital would be encouraged. Perhaps, as the old Chinese idiom goes, "bitter medicine is good", the best for the long-term Chinese economy would be fore Beijing to stop its intervene in the currency market and let Yuan fall to 7 to 1 USD and further free up the financial market for foreign sovereign fund to come in and buy up inefficient firms on the cheap. Beijing is not Icelandic government, the latter of the scenario could hardly happen, what is more likely to play out is PBC doing the Fed's job of slowing and mildly lowering Chinese rates indirectly raising the US rates, while at the same time trying to boost its export to "One Road, One Belt" partners to solve the excessive domestic production and guide Chinese economy into a soft landing.
China's Asian partners would all have to depreciate their currencies to remain competitive in export. ECB would have to increase its quantitative easing too. Japanese and European stocks would both rise in this scenario, though without sustainability. Art collectibles and Swiss Franc would be a haven in this scenario.
Assuming critical variable to be US politics.The US wins the oil war, oil price rises, US inflation rate rises and the Fed raises rates at a faster pace, resulting in capital inflow from the rest of the world. EM markets would crash. Chinese export to the US would improve however, capital would be more expensive as supply of loanable funds would drop after capital outflow to seek attractive US assets. 200B flew out of Chinese market via illegal channels in August alone, it is not too unreasonable to expect 1-1.5 trillion to leave the Chinese market and the effects would be negative if not devastating when local governments struggle to issue bonds. There will be a flood of Chinese companies filing for bankruptcy. Beijing would ultimately give more freedom to its bond market, without sound legal system supporting market regulation, ahead of Beijing's plan. Neither Japanese nor European market would be a haven in this scenario. Art collectibles and American dollars would be, and very likely Norwegian Krone too, Norway producing oil at $40 bbl being one of a few reasons the currency would do less badly than others in this scenario.
Assuming Chinese economy to be the most critical variable, that is to say, US raises its rates most mildly and less frequently than most expect and ECB does not do another round of quantitative easing.
But Euro to Norwegian Krone has fallen from roughly 1.35 to 1.05... Norwegian Krone would be too expensive in the scenario that oil does not drop further and ECB holds its monetary polices unchanged. Only should oil drop below $28 bbl would it be a good play to long Norwegian Krone and short Euro. According to IMF, the estimated oil price for Norway to balance its 2015 is $40 and that would partly explain Krone's current strength.
I've been in investment management since 1990, currently as a long-only money manager for Alsin Capital. I received my law degree from the University of Oregon in 1984, worked as an accountant for the international accounting firm KPMG, then got involved in investing. I've written over 300 columns for The Financial Times, TheStreet.com, Realmoney.com and SeekingAlpha.com.
I am a Portuguese independent trader, analyst and algorithmic trading expert, having worked for both sell side (brokerage) and buy side (fund management) institutions.
I've been trading professionally for about 20 years and also launched www.thinkfn.com in 2004. Thinkfn (Think Finance) carries thousands of educational articles on finance and the markets.
I trade futures, stocks from the long and short side, forex and options. I trade both discretionary and fully automated systems (Metatrader, Quantshare and others).
I can be reached at paulo.santosATthinkfn.com or followed on Twitter at twitter.com/ThinkFinance999