bonddude

Buy Shares of Imaging3 in Anticipation of Future FDA Approval

Uh, your joking right? All one has to do is look at your comment record and yep, it's official, you do know what garbage looks like as you tout some dog CHI-Com bubble stock that has dragged ass for years with barely any reliable info available (CHID.OB).
You have got to be about 12 years old, huh?

Look sonny, you play with the bull sometimes you get the horns, which you are about to. One filing doesn't always tell the whole story. Read it and run along to your make believe world Mr. Soros.

investorshub.advfn.com...


On Nov 15 10:48 PM Legacy Investments & Development, LP wrote:

> I can't believe that Seeking Alpha allowed for a post to be made
> public on a P.O.S. like this company. What a share.
>
> Fundamentals, what fundamentals? Maybe you're comfortable betting
> on deals with roughly $1.5MM in TTM revenue and no major funding
> partner, like GE for example - a company that regularly funds technology
> partners and innovators, but there's no way any of the remarks made
> justify a $330MM market cap.
>
> Finally, to the uninformed that is bonddude, you likely need to stick
> to Bonds, not Equities. You incorrectly state "the stock price was
> $ .04 when they did that deal," in reference to the IMGG 107,059,027
> two and a half ($0.025) placement.
>
> - In fact, as the 8K stated, the money closed on Oct 8, 2009, a
> day on which IMGG traded between $0.54 - $0.61.
> - Further fact, revealed in the company's Q3 filing (that's September
> end 2009 bonddude), the company had NO MONEY BOOKED FROM THE OFFERING
> which means, of course, the from Oct 1 through Oct 8 the entire $0.025
> PPM was placed - AT A MERE 95%+ DISCOUNT TO MARKET.
>
> What a shame this pure pump has now made it's way to SA.

Buy Shares of Imaging3 in Anticipation of Future FDA Approval

Were you aware the stock price was $ .04 when they did that deal? All of a sudden there was aggressive buying right afterwards. Perhaps by the same entity that bought at 2.5 cents.
After all, they got a good look under the hood, right?


On Nov 15 10:35 AM dual cit wrote:

> Are you nuts ? They did a private placement on Oct 8th of 107,059,027
> shares of its common stock at a purchase price of $0.025 per share

Surprise! No bank failures Friday night. Tally for the year holds at 98.

Here's your bank failure !

finance.yahoo.com/news...

Bank Stress Tests: Tangible Common Equity a Critical Metric

Additionally, stag-deflation for a while changing to stag-inflation when we start counting up the debt with a public mindset of "I'm never gonna borrow like that again, no?

Bank Stress Tests: Tangible Common Equity a Critical Metric

Yes but then you missed my comment about what is not being talked about yet the Fed is keeping tabs on, namely off balance sheet derivatives. Perhaps in my attempt at humor I wasn't clear.
THAT is a drag for YEARS AND YEARS.


On Apr 24 11:20 AM wobatus wrote:

> Level 2 and level 3 assets may be a drag for a while. depends on
> what you mean by years and years. Go look at 1974. 1982. 1991.
> Different scale, sure. Maybe your reference is more 1933.
>
> We'll see.
>
> If inflation is everyone's eventual worry, well then...

Bank Stress Tests: Tangible Common Equity a Critical Metric

"Just a spoonful of sugar"- Mary Poppins

There ain't enough honey in the world to make me think that level 2 & 3 assets won't be a drag for years and years. Those catagories add up to far more than level 1 right? Of course.

So JP Morgan has how many off book CDS committments?

88 $ Trillion? Spoken with a Fargo accent--"OH GEEEZ"

Three Card Monte and the Feigned Outrage Against AIG

1. AIG CEO told congress they had to provide almost 100% collateral when CDS contracts were "triggered". - Net effect being probable massive selling bias on all new exchange traded contracts creating more liquidation across all asset classes (excepting Oil and Metals if a major war breaks out).

2. There is a massive amount of other unregulated CDS CDO contracts estimated to be up to $250 Trillion in notional value world wide exerting massive selling pressure on the most liquid contracts- and this should be good for exchanges conducting these trades like selling picks and shovels to the 49ERS.

3. The net effects on the world economy seem to bear out the stag-deflation scenario that Roubini sees. Black Swan?

AIG Needs Transparency, Now

I would be shocked, of course, to see Mr. Soros' hedge fund at the top of the list.

Why Bank Nationalization Will Never Happen

I meant "hole" sorry

Why Bank Nationalization Will Never Happen

Dave-You are the man. Geithner's silence is deafening. Meanwhile, the "N" word is being leaked for sounding returns on the Sunday talk shows by
Leading Senators. The longer they wait the larger the black whole gets. The larger the whole becomes the more triggering of dormant but huge notional amounts of cds s for settlement. TAP-TAP-TAP.... is this thing on?

Why Bank Nationalization Will Never Happen

Nice try. All of these bankers bought stock, some several times, at much higher prices late last year. And Jamie is packing the most derivative exposure of anyone. I think when Conservative Senators like Lindsey Graham are saying nationalization is on the table it's more likely than you think !!!

Laszlo Birinyi: S&P 750's the Bottom - Barron's Interview

i wouldn't listen to him just because his voice annoys the hell out of me.

Fear and Loathing in 2009

Najjy- You're right, I'm sure, but wow you must have gotten some rotten xmas presents guy. I'm trying dxo for a bounce per chance at the open. What say you?

If Mary Schapiro's the Answer...

Ole Mary was part of the effort to squeeze small B/Ds by pushing T+3. The result was customers were pushed into the arms of the crooks that she did not properly audit and are now out of business. Just another crass politician with a political agenda. So take it easy knee-jerk apologist who don't know what the _____ you are talking about.

Obama's Choice for SEC Chief: 'Strong Investor Advocate' Schapiro

Can't stand her. Quintessential politician. Seidman says she is smart but I agree with above. Asleep at the switch. I have seen some of the stupidest and wasteful audits of small firms while the big boys have stolen and raped during her tenure. Change? If Levitt likes her be suspicious. This is the same group that put the sqeeze on a lot of small firms with T+3 etc... and forced customers to do business with the crooks and then they didn't do their jobs and audit them very well. Mary Shapiro? Not so much!