Seeking Alpha

wakeup call » Comments » BAC

  • Wasted Lessons from AIG [View article]
    And Greenberg was misspelled
    Oct 16 08:07 am |Rating: 0 -4 |Link to Comment
  • FASB Changes Perpetuate Fair Value Lying [View article]
    Your generalization using the condo example is short sighted. The shifting sand issue should have been uncovered if proper due diligence was undertaken resulting in the deal never being done. This has nothing to do with mtm. Forcing companies with large, longterm hold portfolios to take paper losses due to mark to market accounting is dealing in the make believe. As an example if I make investments with a hold to maturity strategy and are forced to mtm quarterly the volitility reflected in my financial statements would have me go from red ink to black and back depending on general market conditions. Would I have earned or lost cash - absolutely not. Rather when I actually sell or redeem those investments then I would reflect a real gain or loss. Now tell me again why mtm is a good thing?
    Apr 03 10:50 am |Rating: +2 0 |Link to Comment
  • One Easy CDS Fix [View article]
    While we are at it short selling should be eliminated. It creates a death spiral provided the short seller has sufficient resources to take a major short position. This at the very least is market manipulation. It was outlawed for a brief period last year for financial stocks. Once the successful test period ended it was not renewed. Taking out short selling and elimninating mark to market would go a long way towards fixing out busted economy and put some light at the end of the tunnel. Light at the end of the tunnel in my opinion is the only way to restore consumer optimism whihc will help prime the pump. The are two fixes that can be put in place with the stroke of a pen. Why is there no movement?
    Mar 31 08:58 am |Rating: +2 -1 |Link to Comment
  • Exclusive: Big Banks' Recent Profitability Due to AIG Scam? [View article]
    Eliminating mark to market accounting would have eliminated so much of the game playing and yet the government refuses to take this action. It would be a no cost fix for most likely $1.8 trillion of mark to market losses. There has been a great deal of talk about eliminating the practice but no action. Would be interesting to know why.
    Mar 30 09:19 am |Rating: +3 -12 |Link to Comment
  • The Microwave Society's Answer to the Economy Is Half Baked  [View article]
    The problem with CDOs is not the underlying paper. The problem with CDOs is that the discount reflected a potential perception of possible market problems. If you look at the CDO valuations in relation to the actual portfolio performance you will see discounts that are no relection of actual performance. To remove this anomaly from the analysis take away mark to market accounting then deal with actual loans that do go bad. A bad loan is fixable since there is something tangible behind it. A CDO is a synthetic and difficult or impossible o fix.
    Mar 27 11:01 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
More on BAC by wakeup call
Comments by Ticker
wakeup call's
Comments Stats
26 comments
Rating: 19 (47 - 28 )