...there isnt much insight in that article as it relates to what the stock might actually be worth on a fundamental basis, just some basic math on how far the stock has to fall to catch the others, which isnt really that helpful for any purpose, actually. you are right though, that people look at the same set of facts and make their own conclusions,and that no one is perfect in this regard. many people however dont actually do the work and look at facts.
On Nov 10 09:14 PM investor88 wrote:
> Bespoke has written a useful article and recapitulate useful FACTS. > We can learn from the facts, never mind opinions and interpretations. > Everyone is entitled to his analysis and conclusion whether right > or wrong. No one is perfect. >
'Good As Goldman' Not So Good [View article]
On Nov 10 09:14 PM investor88 wrote:
> Bespoke has written a useful article and recapitulate useful FACTS.
> We can learn from the facts, never mind opinions and interpretations.
> Everyone is entitled to his analysis and conclusion whether right
> or wrong. No one is perfect.
>
'Good As Goldman' Not So Good [View article]
On Nov 10 09:08 PM junkinthesack wrote:
> we know to filter goldman predictions
'Good As Goldman' Not So Good [View article]
On Nov 10 09:08 PM junkinthesack wrote:
> we know to filter goldman predictions
'Good As Goldman' Not So Good [View article]
On Nov 10 09:08 PM junkinthesack wrote:
> we know to filter goldman predictions
'Good As Goldman' Not So Good [View article]
On Nov 10 09:08 PM junkinthesack wrote:
> we know to filter goldman predictions
'Good As Goldman' Not So Good [View article]
On Nov 10 09:08 PM junkinthesack wrote:
> we know to filter goldman predictions
'Good As Goldman' Not So Good [View article]
On Nov 10 09:08 PM junkinthesack wrote:
> we know to filter goldman predictions
'Good As Goldman' Not So Good [View article]
On Nov 10 09:08 PM junkinthesack wrote:
> we know to filter goldman predictions