The problem is what the alternative might be. Currently, the government is throwing around the idea of putting the ratings in the hands of regulators. That means government. These are the same people that opened the door to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac holding exponentially more sub prime slime and alt a mortgages than they had ever owned in the past. These are the same people that blocked the oversight of the GSEs so that low income homeowners wouldn't be shut out of homeownership. Do you think the government would do a more effective job?
On Feb 03 09:35 AM Larrysyr wrote:
> How did these securities ever earned a AAA rating? I think that > S&P's (and Moody's and Fitch's) track record in rating MBS disqualifies > them from having any hand in evaluating the current worth of these > securities. On this one, the market has spoken ... and we should > listen.
What Should a 'Bad Bank' Pay? [View article]
On Feb 03 09:35 AM Larrysyr wrote:
> How did these securities ever earned a AAA rating? I think that
> S&P's (and Moody's and Fitch's) track record in rating MBS disqualifies
> them from having any hand in evaluating the current worth of these
> securities. On this one, the market has spoken ... and we should
> listen.