User 296329's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com http://seekingalpha.comuser/296329/comments http://seekingalpha.com/article/96604/comments?source=feed#comment-303628 303628

On Sep 23 12:52 AM steve Ward wrote:

> I can only assume the NY Times does not favor a pipeline for natural
> gas out of A;aska to the lower 48.
> I can only further assuime that the NY Times has no other hidden
> agenda on the Palin /pipeline proposal than other to say that the
> NY Times needs to point out as to what alternative does have an immediate
> value. And by immediate I guess we mean NOW.
> It is incumbent of the NY Times to profer the "immediate solution".]]> Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:35:17 -0500

On Sep 23 12:52 AM steve Ward wrote:

> I can only assume the NY Times does not favor a pipeline for natural
> gas out of A;aska to the lower 48.
> I can only further assuime that the NY Times has no other hidden
> agenda on the Palin /pipeline proposal than other to say that the
> NY Times needs to point out as to what alternative does have an immediate
> value. And by immediate I guess we mean NOW.
> It is incumbent of the NY Times to profer the "immediate solution".]]>