Hmm...agree100% with Dana...my brother (avid PSmag reader) must have read this before we had our discussion!
Most PS faithful's are asking themselves the exact same questions Dana did...what is the opportunity cost of the $600, and am I going to get more game for my buck? The lack of games when PS3 did become available (in limted release, so I guess that was an oxymoron of sorts) meant you shell out $600 and can only play what 1 or 2 games, and you only get a demo of MotoRsToRm...what's the point if I can't play it? Timing was grossly mismanaged by Sony...
Nintendo vs. Sony: Like Atari vs. Betamax All Over Again [View article]
Playstation and Nintendo are 2 totally different animals, my opinion.
you will see it in Sony's numbers. For now...you could say Xbox and Wii are holding their own...but its because (technology-wise) PS3 is a few years ahead...a bit like msft and vista's diffusion taking 5 yrs.
Microsoft vs. Sony vs. Nintendo: Demand Doesn’t Lie [View article]
Absolutely LOVED this! FANTASTISCH!!!!!!!!
"everyone knows I’m the best. I use my spare processing to cure Alzheimer’s."
LOL
Playstation Guru Endorses Xbox [View article]
Most PS faithful's are asking themselves the exact same questions Dana did...what is the opportunity cost of the $600, and am I going to get more game for my buck? The lack of games when PS3 did become available (in limted release, so I guess that was an oxymoron of sorts) meant you shell out $600 and can only play what 1 or 2 games, and you only get a demo of MotoRsToRm...what's the point if I can't play it? Timing was grossly mismanaged by Sony...
Nintendo vs. Sony: Like Atari vs. Betamax All Over Again [View article]
you will see it in Sony's numbers. For now...you could say Xbox and Wii are holding their own...but its because (technology-wise) PS3 is a few years ahead...a bit like msft and vista's diffusion taking 5 yrs.