Toyota Joins Ford and Swings to a Surprise Profit [View article]
IT WAS THE TOYOTA REPUBLICANS IDEA TO INCLUDE THE ASIAN "RUST BOXES"... HOW DO YOU THINK WE GOT IN THIS MESS?
On Nov 07 09:21 AM a. palmer jr. wrote:
> I don't believe that US government handouts to the auto makers should > have included foreign car makers. They should have let Japan bail > out Toyota instead of us. Our auto makers would have sold many more > cars if our government officials had used a little sense.
TAKE YOUR TOYOTA AND HONDA AND AND DO YOU KNOW WHAT WITH THEM... ARE YOU A SPOKESPERSON FOR THE ASIAN "RUST BOX" MANUFACTURES? THERE ARE MORE DOMESTIC QUALITY VEHICLES WITH HIGH MILLAGE ON THE ROAD THE THERE ARE ASIAN "RUST BOXES". THIS IS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NOT "ASIA"... GET LOST!!!!!!!!!!!!!
On Nov 04 08:18 AM David Sullivan wrote:
> As baby boomers retire, they drive much less. As retirement looms, > people become savers. > All those Toyotas and Hondas on the road with 300,000 miles, plus > the information in Consumer Reports, push buyers to avoid Dodge Caravans > which only make it to 120,000 (and then with a lot of costly repairs.)
UNLESS WELL PAYING MANUFACTURING JOBS ARE BROUGHT BACK THIS COUNTRY AND GIVE PEOPLE BUYING POWER, WE WILL NOT SEE ANY SIGNIFICANT GROWTH... CORPORATE AMERICA CAN NOT SEND OUR JOBS TO SLAVE LABOR COUNTRIES AND IMPORT THOSE PRODUCTS BACK TO THIS COUNTRY AND EXPECT THOSE WHO'S JOBS THEY HAVE TAKEN AWAY TO BE ABLE TO AFFORD THOSE PRODUCTS.
Too Big to Fail: Now It Gets Interesting [View article]
"Competitiveness in American industry"...Joseph... are you telling me that if we lower American worker's wages to the same level as the Chinese, Mexicans and the Koreans our economy's problems will be solved?
CORPORATE AMERICA HAS BANKRUPTED THIS COUNTRY BY SELLING OUR JOBS TO SLAVE LABOR IN OTHER COUNTRIES, FORCING US TO COMPETE WITH THEM, LOWERING OUR BUYING POWER, OUR TAX BASE AND OUR STANDARD OF LIVING. THIS COUNTRY BUYS MOST OF WHAT THE WORLD PRODUCES... UNLESS OUR GOOD PAYING MANUFACTURING JOBS ARE BROUGHT BACK THERE WILL NOT BE BUYING POWER, NO TAX BASE, NO MAIN STREET AND WITH OUT MAIN STREET THERE WILL BE NO WALL STREET.
GM: What Its Progress Report Doesn't Say [View article]
GM IS STILL #1 IN THE USA...APPARENTLY MORE PEOPLE WANT GM CARS THEN ANY OTHERS..IF YOU WANT TO BUY TOYOTA RUST BOXES GO AHEAD, BUT DON'T BLAME GM.
BTW...TOYOTA DOESN'T MAKE MONTE CARLO IETHER!!!!!
On Oct 09 11:47 AM Ralph Hunkey wrote:
> A message to GM..........start manufacturing auto's that we want......Example: > Bring back the Monte Carlo......If not, I am for the first time a > Toyota buyer.... > > Incidently: I still drive my 2002 Monte......22 miles per gallon...so > shove your 40,000 Volt.....or sell it to Obama
GM: What Its Progress Report Doesn't Say [View article]
YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT LIARS? GOOGLE THE ASIAN BOGUS MPG ON MOST OF THEIR PRODUCT.
On Oct 08 05:19 PM Douglas Korthof wrote:
> General Motors is a proven liar and perverter of the truth, about > everything from the EV1 to the VOLT. The same nincompoops leading > GM now are the ones who fatuously and arrogantly led it into the > toilet over the last few decades. Ironically, GM just RAISED salaries > to "retain talent"!! With talent like that, there is NO HOPE. > > GM's only hope is to flush out bad management, from top to bottom; > but they are living in a dream world, still blaming the line worker > for GM's management failures. > > I can see it now. Fritz thinks "it was all the UAW's fault! What > they should have done was design better cars, and cut management > fat!!". > > Unfortunately, Obama has just funded the same crew of bozos to continue > blowing money down the toilet for another couple years. They will > need more, of course.
GM: What Its Progress Report Doesn't Say [View article]
BTW...CHEVY COBALT AT $16,000 AND 37MPG...COMPARE IT TO YOUR ASIAN HYBRID RUST BOXES AT $24000...YOU'D HAVE TO OWN YOU RUST BOX 23 YEARS TO BREAK EVEN.
On Oct 08 03:07 PM Jeff B. wrote:
> Rick: I agree with you right down the line. GM likes to over-promise > & under deliver. Remember "We have 30 models that get 30 mpg". > Oh sure, how many colors does the Cobalt come in? Each is a different > "model" right? > My 'worldclass' 2009 Malibu fleet car is going in for it's first > recall repair tomorrow. Nothing too serious, but I've owned 6 new > Hondas, and 3 Acuras, and no recalls at all. I also had a 2008 Impala, > sincle my employer uses these for fleet cars. They are quick & > get good gas mileage (better than the Malibu on gas, ironically) > but otherwise are truly a bad car. Many engineering glitches including > defective steering system that GM only acknowledges when you press > them REALLY hard. Maybe Fritz ought to adopt a new policy: Keep his > mouth shut, cut back on advertsing smoke & mirrors, and put the > cash into engineering?
GM: What Its Progress Report Doesn't Say [View article]
JEFF...GET OFF AMERICA AND GM'S REAR END...IF YOU DID NOT GET A RECALL NOTICE FROM HONDA ITS PERHAPS BECAUSE YOU DON'T OWN ONE!!!!!!!!!!!! March 3, 2008
• More automotive news ...
Honda is recalling 273,000 2004 to 2008 ACURA TL sports sedans because power steering fluid may leak, leading to a fire in the engine compartment. The company is also recalling 129,000 2004 to 2005 Acura TL sports sedans, this time because of a windshield wiper problem.
“Prolonged high under-hood temperatures may cause the poser steering hose to deteriorate prematurely causing the hose to crack and leak power steering fluid,” according to the National Highway traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
> Rick: I agree with you right down the line. GM likes to over-promise > & under deliver. Remember "We have 30 models that get 30 mpg". > Oh sure, how many colors does the Cobalt come in? Each is a different > "model" right? > My 'worldclass' 2009 Malibu fleet car is going in for it's first > recall repair tomorrow. Nothing too serious, but I've owned 6 new > Hondas, and 3 Acuras, and no recalls at all. I also had a 2008 Impala, > sincle my employer uses these for fleet cars. They are quick & > get good gas mileage (better than the Malibu on gas, ironically) > but otherwise are truly a bad car. Many engineering glitches including > defective steering system that GM only acknowledges when you press > them REALLY hard. Maybe Fritz ought to adopt a new policy: Keep his > mouth shut, cut back on advertsing smoke & mirrors, and put the > cash into engineering?
Volkswagen Plans North America Onslaught [View article]
YOU'RE RIGHT... THE ONE THING WE DO NOT NEED IS LIVABLE WAGES, HEALTH CARE BENEFITS, SAFETY WORK RULES. WHAT WE NEED IS MORE FOREIGN TRANSPLANTS UNDERCUTTING THE AMERICAN UNION WORKERS, BRING DOWN OUR WAGES, CUT OUT BENEFITS. THAT IS GOING TO JUMP START OUR ECONOMY, INCREASE PEOPLE'S BUYING POWER, GIVE US A STRONG TAX BASE AND OF COURSE PUT US AT PAR WITH THE REST OF THE THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES...SUCCESS ON A MASSIVE SCALE...
AND WE WONDER HOW WE GOT IN THIS MESS!!!!!!!!!!!!
On Aug 28 04:13 PM cynnatalie2000 wrote:
> As long as VW is able to avoid the UAW, it will succeed on a massive > scale. > > Who would not want a VW brand as opposed to a Toyota if the products > are similar.
Toyota Wins 'Cash for Clunkers' Race So Far [View article]
I agree that taxpayer's money should be used to purchase domestic products...do "WE THE PEOPLE" NEED TO BE TOLD TO DO SO? President Obama and congress are not buying the foreign rust boxes..."WE THE PEOPLE" are...And we wonder how we got in this mess!!!!!!!!!!
On Aug 08 04:21 PM Chancer wrote:
> I guess the details are easily missed by Congress, since they don't > bother reading the bills they pass. > > Logic would dictate that if you want to help the US economy, you > would only make it available to US car brands: Ford, GM, and Chysler > (although now run by Fiat). > > If the foreign companies wanted to compete, they would absorb that > rebate cost- not the US taxpayer. > > Hey Congress: > > Wouldn't that make more sense; if you are really thinking about cost > to the taxpayer and the enormous deficit. > > But hey, once Congress and Obama spent the US economy into bankruptcy, > why worry about a few billion more- espcially if it buys some popularity > with voters. It is so easy to spend money when it isn't yours.
Toyota Wins 'Cash for Clunkers' Race So Far [View article]
BUYING FOREIGN RUST BOXES WITH THEIR OWN TAX MONEY...The American people do not have the rights to bitch and complain if the domestic auto are not able to re-pay the government loans...the contrary...when they get up in the morning and look in their mirrors they should be looking at someone slapping the cr@p out of the person they're looking @.
Taxpayers: Beware GM's Decision to Build Compact in Michigan [View article]
FAT CATS LIKE YOU ARE TOO BUSY SPENDING THEIR MONEY...NON UNION POOR WORKING STIFFS ARE TOO BUSY SURVIVING...THE ONLY PEOPLE THAT ARE A THORN IN YOUR REAR END ARE THE UNION WAGES MIDDLE CLASS...WE ASK QUESTIONS...WE SEND OUR CHILDREN TO COLLEGE...WE BUY THE NEWS PAPER...WE WATCH THE NEWS; WE'RE THE THORN IN YOUR REAR END..WITH OUT UNIONS WE'D BE SLAVES...YOUR CUP OF TEA!
On Jul 06 08:50 PM Big Bubbette wrote:
> The sooner we are rid of unions the better. Start with all gettting > rid of government unions.
Sort by:
Latest | Highest ratedToyota Joins Ford and Swings to a Surprise Profit [View article]
On Nov 07 09:21 AM a. palmer jr. wrote:
> I don't believe that US government handouts to the auto makers should
> have included foreign car makers. They should have let Japan bail
> out Toyota instead of us. Our auto makers would have sold many more
> cars if our government officials had used a little sense.
Auto Sales Stabilize in October [View article]
On Nov 04 08:18 AM David Sullivan wrote:
> As baby boomers retire, they drive much less. As retirement looms,
> people become savers.
> All those Toyotas and Hondas on the road with 300,000 miles, plus
> the information in Consumer Reports, push buyers to avoid Dodge Caravans
> which only make it to 120,000 (and then with a lot of costly repairs.)
U.S. Economy Is Growing Again? [View article]
Toyota Prius Again Tops EPA Fuel Economy Ratings [View article]
Toyota Prius Again Tops EPA Fuel Economy Ratings [View article]
Toyota Prius Again Tops EPA Fuel Economy Ratings [View article]
Too Big to Fail: Now It Gets Interesting [View article]
CORPORATE AMERICA HAS BANKRUPTED THIS COUNTRY BY SELLING OUR JOBS TO SLAVE LABOR IN OTHER COUNTRIES, FORCING US TO COMPETE WITH THEM, LOWERING OUR BUYING POWER, OUR TAX BASE AND OUR STANDARD OF LIVING. THIS COUNTRY BUYS MOST OF WHAT THE WORLD PRODUCES... UNLESS OUR GOOD PAYING MANUFACTURING JOBS ARE BROUGHT BACK THERE WILL NOT BE BUYING POWER, NO TAX BASE, NO MAIN STREET AND WITH OUT MAIN STREET THERE WILL BE NO WALL STREET.
GM: What Its Progress Report Doesn't Say [View article]
BTW...TOYOTA DOESN'T MAKE MONTE CARLO IETHER!!!!!
On Oct 09 11:47 AM Ralph Hunkey wrote:
> A message to GM..........start manufacturing auto's that we want......Example:
> Bring back the Monte Carlo......If not, I am for the first time a
> Toyota buyer....
>
> Incidently: I still drive my 2002 Monte......22 miles per gallon...so
> shove your 40,000 Volt.....or sell it to Obama
GM: What Its Progress Report Doesn't Say [View article]
On Oct 08 05:19 PM Douglas Korthof wrote:
> General Motors is a proven liar and perverter of the truth, about
> everything from the EV1 to the VOLT. The same nincompoops leading
> GM now are the ones who fatuously and arrogantly led it into the
> toilet over the last few decades. Ironically, GM just RAISED salaries
> to "retain talent"!! With talent like that, there is NO HOPE.
>
> GM's only hope is to flush out bad management, from top to bottom;
> but they are living in a dream world, still blaming the line worker
> for GM's management failures.
>
> I can see it now. Fritz thinks "it was all the UAW's fault! What
> they should have done was design better cars, and cut management
> fat!!".
>
> Unfortunately, Obama has just funded the same crew of bozos to continue
> blowing money down the toilet for another couple years. They will
> need more, of course.
GM: What Its Progress Report Doesn't Say [View article]
On Oct 08 03:07 PM Jeff B. wrote:
> Rick: I agree with you right down the line. GM likes to over-promise
> & under deliver. Remember "We have 30 models that get 30 mpg".
> Oh sure, how many colors does the Cobalt come in? Each is a different
> "model" right?
> My 'worldclass' 2009 Malibu fleet car is going in for it's first
> recall repair tomorrow. Nothing too serious, but I've owned 6 new
> Hondas, and 3 Acuras, and no recalls at all. I also had a 2008 Impala,
> sincle my employer uses these for fleet cars. They are quick &
> get good gas mileage (better than the Malibu on gas, ironically)
> but otherwise are truly a bad car. Many engineering glitches including
> defective steering system that GM only acknowledges when you press
> them REALLY hard. Maybe Fritz ought to adopt a new policy: Keep his
> mouth shut, cut back on advertsing smoke & mirrors, and put the
> cash into engineering?
GM: What Its Progress Report Doesn't Say [View article]
March 3, 2008
• More automotive news ...
Honda is recalling 273,000 2004 to 2008 ACURA TL sports sedans because power steering fluid may leak, leading to a fire in the engine compartment. The company is also recalling 129,000 2004 to 2005 Acura TL sports sedans, this time because of a windshield wiper problem.
“Prolonged high under-hood temperatures may cause the poser steering hose to deteriorate prematurely causing the hose to crack and leak power steering fluid,” according to the National Highway traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
Read more: www.consumeraffairs.co...
On Oct 08 03:07 PM Jeff B. wrote:
> Rick: I agree with you right down the line. GM likes to over-promise
> & under deliver. Remember "We have 30 models that get 30 mpg".
> Oh sure, how many colors does the Cobalt come in? Each is a different
> "model" right?
> My 'worldclass' 2009 Malibu fleet car is going in for it's first
> recall repair tomorrow. Nothing too serious, but I've owned 6 new
> Hondas, and 3 Acuras, and no recalls at all. I also had a 2008 Impala,
> sincle my employer uses these for fleet cars. They are quick &
> get good gas mileage (better than the Malibu on gas, ironically)
> but otherwise are truly a bad car. Many engineering glitches including
> defective steering system that GM only acknowledges when you press
> them REALLY hard. Maybe Fritz ought to adopt a new policy: Keep his
> mouth shut, cut back on advertsing smoke & mirrors, and put the
> cash into engineering?
Volkswagen Plans North America Onslaught [View article]
WHAT WE NEED IS MORE FOREIGN TRANSPLANTS UNDERCUTTING THE AMERICAN UNION WORKERS, BRING DOWN OUR WAGES, CUT OUT BENEFITS. THAT IS GOING TO JUMP START OUR ECONOMY, INCREASE PEOPLE'S BUYING POWER, GIVE US A STRONG TAX BASE AND OF COURSE PUT US AT PAR WITH THE REST OF THE THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES...SUCCESS ON A MASSIVE SCALE...
AND WE WONDER HOW WE GOT IN THIS MESS!!!!!!!!!!!!
On Aug 28 04:13 PM cynnatalie2000 wrote:
> As long as VW is able to avoid the UAW, it will succeed on a massive
> scale.
>
> Who would not want a VW brand as opposed to a Toyota if the products
> are similar.
Toyota Wins 'Cash for Clunkers' Race So Far [View article]
On Aug 08 04:21 PM Chancer wrote:
> I guess the details are easily missed by Congress, since they don't
> bother reading the bills they pass.
>
> Logic would dictate that if you want to help the US economy, you
> would only make it available to US car brands: Ford, GM, and Chysler
> (although now run by Fiat).
>
> If the foreign companies wanted to compete, they would absorb that
> rebate cost- not the US taxpayer.
>
> Hey Congress:
>
> Wouldn't that make more sense; if you are really thinking about cost
> to the taxpayer and the enormous deficit.
>
> But hey, once Congress and Obama spent the US economy into bankruptcy,
> why worry about a few billion more- espcially if it buys some popularity
> with voters. It is so easy to spend money when it isn't yours.
Toyota Wins 'Cash for Clunkers' Race So Far [View article]
Taxpayers: Beware GM's Decision to Build Compact in Michigan [View article]
On Jul 06 08:50 PM Big Bubbette wrote:
> The sooner we are rid of unions the better. Start with all gettting
> rid of government unions.