Seeking Alpha

Alex Biggs » Comments » RSX

  • Friday Roundup: Commodities, Emerging Markets [View article]
    Crudeman,

    Dave's still posting his charts but you can now sign up and receive updates directly on his new website. Or you can see a portion of his daily posts in SA's instablogs.


    On Dec 02 01:22 PM Crudeman wrote:

    > Where the Fry Guy be?? We miss you Bwana...
    Dec 02 23:31 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Friday Roundup: Commodities, Emerging Markets [View article]
    nymag.com/guides/money.../


    On Sep 28 09:49 AM ray b wrote:

    > If you think Frye is a GS basher, you should visit the ZeroHedge
    > site.
    Sep 28 12:00 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Friday Outlook: Commodities, Global Markets [View article]
    Mr. Fry has a conservative growth portfolio (which I follow) that he publishes for his subscribers on his website.


    On Sep 25 08:36 AM JGL wrote:

    > do you publish your "buy and hold" portfolio somehwere?
    Sep 25 15:56 pm |Rating: +1 0 |Link to Comment
  • Wednesday Outlook: Commodities, Global Markets [View article]
    Pau, your comments contribute nothing to the conversation and are pure ka-ka. Sadly, the only one you are following is Nick Gogerty. Is that you per chance? Get lost.


    On Sep 16 12:06 AM Pau wrote:

    > A basic summary for anyone paying attention. Where is the insight,
    > David? Nothing here, really.
    Sep 16 09:08 am |Rating: +21 -3 |Link to Comment
  • Tuesday Outlook: Commodities, Global Markets [View article]
    That's an overstatement. Just cuz.


    On Jul 21 12:58 PM corey mendel wrote:

    > Dosh Tosh... Are you still in High School?
    Jul 21 15:05 pm |Rating: +1 0 |Link to Comment
  • Thursday Outlook: Commodities, Global Markets [View article]
    Daniel3582: Thanks for the post- but from a reader's point of view, perhaps you should consider posting your own column at SA and not piggyback on the author's column? I am interested in intelligent comments and points of view rather than blatant marketing submissions or trolling posts.
    Jul 16 09:42 am |Rating: +13 0 |Link to Comment
  • Thursday Outlook: Commodities, Global Markets [View article]
    www.harpercollins.com/...

    www.history.upenn.edu/...

    Please feel free to provide the readers of this column your authority and credentials that substantiate your comments.


    On Apr 03 10:55 AM raytayzmd wrote:

    > ...first you demonstrate you don't know squat about American economic
    > history:
    >
    > seekingalpha.com/artic...
    >
    >
    > ...and now you demonstrate you know just as little about sunspots
    > and climate...although there is some evidence for some correlation
    > between sunspot activity and climate, NO ONE has determined the nature
    > of that correlation...however, there IS general AGREEMENT that they
    > have FAR LESS impact on the earth's climate than human actions, such
    > as burning fossil fuels or clear-cutting forests, do...
    Apr 03 11:36 am |Rating: +6 0 |Link to Comment
  • Wednesday Outlook: Commodities, Emerging Markets [View article]
    Fakir and Owen: Not sure if you're old enough to have historical perspective based on your comments.

    I believe Mr. Fry is alluding to LBJ's guns and butter and the spending reforms programs of The Great Society.

    Obama's proposal for a sweeping new government activism in the economy is a return to a traditional tax-and-spend philosophy, a step back to the era of Lyndon B. Johnson.


    President Lyndon B. Johnson's policy of Great Society spending and Vietnam War is credited with the rising American inflation that persisted until checked by President Reagan's supply-side policy.

    In Johnson's time the American economy and the US dollar were strong, and there was no current account deficit. Yet, LBJ's policy of guns and butter did long-term harm.

    Craig Paul Roberts writes:

    The Bush/Obama 21st century policy of guns and butter makes LBJ look like a piker. The 2009 and 2010 federal budget deficits will be monstrous even without guns. But Obama is exiting (apparently) the Iraq War in order to start two, possibly three, more wars.

    Obama has announced a doubling of US troops in Afghanistan. Widening that war will require the US to occupy, or attempt to occupy, parts of Pakistan. The disrespect for Pakistan’s sovereignty will further radicalize that large, nuclear-armed country and bring Pakistan, or at least parts of it, into armed conflict with the US.


    www.vdare.com/roberts/...

    Here's an interesting article in the NY Times:

    www.nytimes.com/2009/0...
    Mar 04 10:05 am |Rating: +9 -1 |Link to Comment
More on RSX by Alex Biggs
Comments by Ticker
Alex Biggs'
Comments Stats
12 comments
Rating: 65 (69 - 4 )