<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Braden Holt's Comments</title>
    <description>Braden Holt's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/3093451/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Abraxas Petroleum: Still Searching For Its Core Asset</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1104421/comments?source=feed#comment-17399471</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17399471</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I defined it as an asset that will provide long-term growth.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 10:29:15 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I defined it as an asset that will provide long-term growth.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GMX Resources: The Survival Kit Must Have The Niobrara Shale On Top</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1291841/comments?source=feed#comment-16703681</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16703681</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Ok Chapter 11.  Hopefully my point was still clear.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 14:05:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Ok Chapter 11.  Hopefully my point was still clear.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GMX Resources: The Survival Kit Must Have The Niobrara Shale On Top</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1291841/comments?source=feed#comment-16656291</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16656291</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Their Bakken acreage isn't going to payback for 4 + years and I haven't seen one well in Goshen County, WY that worked.  I like the Niobrara, but even the acreage that works there (Wattenberg excluded) isn't more than an ancillary piece for a company (see EOG's Heresford Ranch or CRZO).    <br/><br/>I wouldn't touch GMXR with a 10 foot pole.  Chapter 9 is looming.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:33:36 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Their Bakken acreage isn't going to payback for 4 + years and I haven't seen one well in Goshen County, WY that worked.  I like the Niobrara, but even the acreage that works there (Wattenberg excluded) isn't more than an ancillary piece for a company (see EOG's Heresford Ranch or CRZO).    <br/><br/>I wouldn't touch GMXR with a 10 foot pole.  Chapter 9 is looming.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Bakken And The Mississippian Lime: A Comparison</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/871491/comments?source=feed#comment-14662111</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14662111</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I wrote this piece: <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/YUcpHF'>http://bit.ly/YUcpHF</a> before SD sold its Permian.  I believe I posted it to SA so you must have missed it.  Devon Shire from SA wrote a good article a couple weeks after mine was published concerning SD's returns: <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/n3pf'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a> .  Full disclosure, I dumped SD at ~$7.30 a couple weeks ago and have no plans to re-enter.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:49:24 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I wrote this piece: <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/YUcpHF'>http://bit.ly/YUcpHF</a> before SD sold its Permian.  I believe I posted it to SA so you must have missed it.  Devon Shire from SA wrote a good article a couple weeks after mine was published concerning SD's returns: <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/n3pf'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a> .  Full disclosure, I dumped SD at ~$7.30 a couple weeks ago and have no plans to re-enter.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Abraxas Petroleum: Still Searching For Its Core Asset</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1104421/comments?source=feed#comment-13559241</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13559241</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[James,<br/><br/>I appreciate the comments and will look for that article.  This piece wasn't a valuation, it was a drill down in to their asset base.  I made note that the company has a low valuation, but no where did I talk about what it's true value might be.  Oil and gas exploration is a risky endeavor, so I look at companies I'm looking for a path to long-term growth.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:47:30 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[James,<br/><br/>I appreciate the comments and will look for that article.  This piece wasn't a valuation, it was a drill down in to their asset base.  I made note that the company has a low valuation, but no where did I talk about what it's true value might be.  Oil and gas exploration is a risky endeavor, so I look at companies I'm looking for a path to long-term growth.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Abraxas Petroleum: Still Searching For Its Core Asset</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1104421/comments?source=feed#comment-13559071</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13559071</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[According to the Texas Railroad Commission the well was completed on March 6, 2012 and produced 21,410 barrels of liquids and 4,852 Mcf of natural gas during March.   I assumed the well produced 25 days during the month of March and if you crunch those numbers you will get 889.  During April, the well produced slightly more oil and more than triple the amount of gas.<br/><br/>It's possible these wells produced for less than 30 days during those months which, if the well fell off, could explain the difference.  I calculate my own data based off of publicly available data and because the State of Texas doesn't give days a well produced in a month, I have to make some assumptions.  Usually, I'm pretty close.  I should have footnoted the data]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:40:26 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[According to the Texas Railroad Commission the well was completed on March 6, 2012 and produced 21,410 barrels of liquids and 4,852 Mcf of natural gas during March.   I assumed the well produced 25 days during the month of March and if you crunch those numbers you will get 889.  During April, the well produced slightly more oil and more than triple the amount of gas.<br/><br/>It's possible these wells produced for less than 30 days during those months which, if the well fell off, could explain the difference.  I calculate my own data based off of publicly available data and because the State of Texas doesn't give days a well produced in a month, I have to make some assumptions.  Usually, I'm pretty close.  I should have footnoted the data]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Abraxas Petroleum: Still Searching For Its Core Asset</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1104421/comments?source=feed#comment-13541171</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13541171</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Their valuation is certainly low, but after taking a close look at their assets I didn't see anything that's going to give them say, ten years of growth and that speaks to their low multiples.  I don't think that's a bad thing as companies don't need to start out with 90k acres in the Eagle Ford to be successful, I was just highlighting that point.  It's easy for investors to look at their presentation and see 23k in the Bakken and 7k in the Eagle Ford and wonder why this company trades so low.  I believe my article explains why that is.  I am open to being wrong though.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:30:22 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Their valuation is certainly low, but after taking a close look at their assets I didn't see anything that's going to give them say, ten years of growth and that speaks to their low multiples.  I don't think that's a bad thing as companies don't need to start out with 90k acres in the Eagle Ford to be successful, I was just highlighting that point.  It's easy for investors to look at their presentation and see 23k in the Bakken and 7k in the Eagle Ford and wonder why this company trades so low.  I believe my article explains why that is.  I am open to being wrong though.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Close Look At SandRidge's Results In The Mississippian</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1067141/comments?source=feed#comment-12896681</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12896681</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for the comment.  The company is actually underfunded and highly levered, so they sold the Permian to fund the development of the Mississippian.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 12:58:59 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for the comment.  The company is actually underfunded and highly levered, so they sold the Permian to fund the development of the Mississippian.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Happened To The Economics Of Sandridge's Mississippian Wells?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1077891/comments?source=feed#comment-12872571</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12872571</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The company made some early assumptions about the play that were incorrect.  Now that they've got two years of production history on some of their earlier wells and have seen huge declines on their bigger wells, they've decided to revise those assumptions down based on that data.  It bothers me that their well performance in the Mississippian hasn't gotten any better over time (you'd like to see an upward trajectory as the company figures out the science).  With that said, it's interesting that both SD and RRC are looking to make this play their focus from an oil standpoint.  RRC's early results have been strong and  new thinking points to the Nemaha Ridge as the play's sweet spot.  It's clear there's a lot of oil in the Miss, so maybe the science/thinking has to catch up a bit.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 14:49:56 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The company made some early assumptions about the play that were incorrect.  Now that they've got two years of production history on some of their earlier wells and have seen huge declines on their bigger wells, they've decided to revise those assumptions down based on that data.  It bothers me that their well performance in the Mississippian hasn't gotten any better over time (you'd like to see an upward trajectory as the company figures out the science).  With that said, it's interesting that both SD and RRC are looking to make this play their focus from an oil standpoint.  RRC's early results have been strong and  new thinking points to the Nemaha Ridge as the play's sweet spot.  It's clear there's a lot of oil in the Miss, so maybe the science/thinking has to catch up a bit.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Close Look At SandRidge's Results In The Mississippian</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1067141/comments?source=feed#comment-12739721</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12739721</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Kansas reports at a lease level, but the wells on I included in this report only have one well on the lease.  As I said before, Oklahoma doesn't report oil production (they do report gas production) but the data is available on purchaser reports.  Outside of those two, some report by lease, some by well.  Texas reports by well for gas and by lease for oil.  North Dakota and Colorado both report by well. <br/><br/>I'm not arguing with you, I'm just making sure the readers of this article don't leave thinking you're doing anything here but trying to obscure facts.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:42:25 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Kansas reports at a lease level, but the wells on I included in this report only have one well on the lease.  As I said before, Oklahoma doesn't report oil production (they do report gas production) but the data is available on purchaser reports.  Outside of those two, some report by lease, some by well.  Texas reports by well for gas and by lease for oil.  North Dakota and Colorado both report by well. <br/><br/>I'm not arguing with you, I'm just making sure the readers of this article don't leave thinking you're doing anything here but trying to obscure facts.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Close Look At SandRidge's Results In The Mississippian</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1067141/comments?source=feed#comment-12737711</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12737711</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Well then as you know, the data comes from purchaser reports that the OCC has searchable on their website.  So if you think the data is bad, then you're basically saying the purchaser (ie: Phillips 66) is lying about how much oil they're purchasing from a given company.<br/><br/> <br/><br/>  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 13:57:03 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Well then as you know, the data comes from purchaser reports that the OCC has searchable on their website.  So if you think the data is bad, then you're basically saying the purchaser (ie: Phillips 66) is lying about how much oil they're purchasing from a given company.<br/><br/> <br/><br/>  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Close Look At SandRidge's Results In The Mississippian</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1067141/comments?source=feed#comment-12726931</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12726931</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks Moby.  The Eagle Ford also has a lot of gas and liquids and some people think it's the best play on the planet.  I'm not putting the Mississippian in that category, but I do think it's economic and there does seem to be a lot of oil there as evidenced by some of the bigger wells.  It's an intriguing stock because its reserves are trading at the levels of a natural gas company and half of those reserves are oil.  With that said, I'd be lying if I didn't ask myself that same question sometimes. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 10:18:09 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks Moby.  The Eagle Ford also has a lot of gas and liquids and some people think it's the best play on the planet.  I'm not putting the Mississippian in that category, but I do think it's economic and there does seem to be a lot of oil there as evidenced by some of the bigger wells.  It's an intriguing stock because its reserves are trading at the levels of a natural gas company and half of those reserves are oil.  With that said, I'd be lying if I didn't ask myself that same question sometimes. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Close Look At SandRidge's Results In The Mississippian</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1067141/comments?source=feed#comment-12710461</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12710461</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The OCC doesn't track oil production, so your comment about their data being &quot;suspicious&quot; doesn't make much sense.  As for these &quot;auditors&quot; you talked to, I guess we'll find out when SD's 2012 reserve report comes out.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 20:20:04 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The OCC doesn't track oil production, so your comment about their data being &quot;suspicious&quot; doesn't make much sense.  As for these &quot;auditors&quot; you talked to, I guess we'll find out when SD's 2012 reserve report comes out.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Close Look At SandRidge's Results In The Mississippian</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1067141/comments?source=feed#comment-12696051</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12696051</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[My gut reaction is yes for the reason you stated.  They have tier 2 assets that will produce a lot of oil for the owner.  But if you look at the company's metrics, they just don't stack up.  I'm torn on SandRidge...I don't think I'd be selling them now, but if I was buying there's probably better opportunities out there.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:13:03 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[My gut reaction is yes for the reason you stated.  They have tier 2 assets that will produce a lot of oil for the owner.  But if you look at the company's metrics, they just don't stack up.  I'm torn on SandRidge...I don't think I'd be selling them now, but if I was buying there's probably better opportunities out there.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Close Look At SandRidge's Results In The Mississippian</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1067141/comments?source=feed#comment-12695561</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12695561</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I know they drilled a handful of wells in Garfield last year, but I haven't looked at the results.  A cursory check shows similar to Grant, but it's a small sample size.  It looks like they have a lot of leasehold there so I would expect them to get to it soon.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:05:55 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I know they drilled a handful of wells in Garfield last year, but I haven't looked at the results.  A cursory check shows similar to Grant, but it's a small sample size.  It looks like they have a lot of leasehold there so I would expect them to get to it soon.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Close Look At SandRidge's Results In The Mississippian</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1067141/comments?source=feed#comment-12695231</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12695231</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You're welcome.  If he still intends to sell the Permian, my personal opinion is that he should be ousted.  With that said, I would buy/sell the stock assuming he stays on.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 13:56:05 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You're welcome.  If he still intends to sell the Permian, my personal opinion is that he should be ousted.  With that said, I would buy/sell the stock assuming he stays on.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Emerging TMS: Vast Oil Potential For Several Natural Gas Weighted Companies</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1052341/comments?source=feed#comment-12518481</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12518481</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Today they might, but again there's only ever been ~20 wells completed in the TMS in history, so there's a lot for companies to learn and hopefully plenty of room for costs to come down.  If this is as low as costs go, then the play might not work, but I doubt that's the case.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:09:02 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Today they might, but again there's only ever been ~20 wells completed in the TMS in history, so there's a lot for companies to learn and hopefully plenty of room for costs to come down.  If this is as low as costs go, then the play might not work, but I doubt that's the case.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ConocoPhillips: Exploiting The Eagle Ford Shale</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1055511/comments?source=feed#comment-12486361</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12486361</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Haha thanks.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:40:55 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Haha thanks.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ConocoPhillips: Exploiting The Eagle Ford Shale</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1055511/comments?source=feed#comment-12485421</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12485421</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Hah yea I wrote that article/that's my blog.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:16:22 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hah yea I wrote that article/that's my blog.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ConocoPhillips: Exploiting The Eagle Ford Shale</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1055511/comments?source=feed#comment-12482951</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12482951</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[They've been drilling the best Eagle Ford wells in my opinion.  The declines on some of their Karnes County wells resemble the Parshall field and Live Oak looks great too.  Anyone know if they've started drilling Lavaca yet?  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:17:47 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[They've been drilling the best Eagle Ford wells in my opinion.  The declines on some of their Karnes County wells resemble the Parshall field and Live Oak looks great too.  Anyone know if they've started drilling Lavaca yet?  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>3 Potential Value Stocks In The Eagle Ford</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1014131/comments?source=feed#comment-11765561</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11765561</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[If you're buying or holding GDP you're really betting on the TMS as that's going to be the major catalyst for the company moving forward.  They absolutely need to find a JV partner for their 150k acres there as they don't have the liquidity to develop it on their own.  Evidence of this is that S&amp;P just downgraded their credit rating because the company hasn't been able to generate cash flow. I look at it like this: there's better options.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:14:05 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[If you're buying or holding GDP you're really betting on the TMS as that's going to be the major catalyst for the company moving forward.  They absolutely need to find a JV partner for their 150k acres there as they don't have the liquidity to develop it on their own.  Evidence of this is that S&amp;P just downgraded their credit rating because the company hasn't been able to generate cash flow. I look at it like this: there's better options.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Seeing The Forest Through The Debt</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/967831/comments?source=feed#comment-11123611</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11123611</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The &quot;screw EOG&quot; comment may not have come off the way I intended it to.  What I was trying to say is that EOG is a fantastic company who gets a lot of coverage, let's look at a  much less sexy company to see if we can find some value. <br/><br/>I agree that financing is an unfortunate distraction for some of these small caps, particularly KOG.  It will be interesting to see how they manage their spending moving forward.  If they believe in the long-term fundamentals of the price of oil they don't need to overextend themselves because the oil itself isn't going anywhere.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 11:17:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The &quot;screw EOG&quot; comment may not have come off the way I intended it to.  What I was trying to say is that EOG is a fantastic company who gets a lot of coverage, let's look at a  much less sexy company to see if we can find some value. <br/><br/>I agree that financing is an unfortunate distraction for some of these small caps, particularly KOG.  It will be interesting to see how they manage their spending moving forward.  If they believe in the long-term fundamentals of the price of oil they don't need to overextend themselves because the oil itself isn't going anywhere.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Value Stock Search: Whiting Petroleum</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/941371/comments?source=feed#comment-10865631</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10865631</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks Mike.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:27:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks Mike.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Value Stock Search: Whiting Petroleum</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/941371/comments?source=feed#comment-10807701</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10807701</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[On the other side of the equation: If I did have a position in Whiting and I was telling you to buy them subsequently, couldn't that be mistaken as a conflict of interest?  <br/><br/>My research and analysis should speak for itself.  I'm not here to make decisions for you, I'm here to provide information and analysis.  I don't run a hedge fund.  I don't pump stocks.  I look at various stocks for various reasons and write about them.  Might I enter Whiting at some point? Sure. Do I plan to in the next 72 hours? No.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 12:51:08 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[On the other side of the equation: If I did have a position in Whiting and I was telling you to buy them subsequently, couldn't that be mistaken as a conflict of interest?  <br/><br/>My research and analysis should speak for itself.  I'm not here to make decisions for you, I'm here to provide information and analysis.  I don't run a hedge fund.  I don't pump stocks.  I look at various stocks for various reasons and write about them.  Might I enter Whiting at some point? Sure. Do I plan to in the next 72 hours? No.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Putting Kodiak's Valuation Into Perspective</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/885081/comments?source=feed#comment-9810871</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9810871</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I don't disagree with what you've said, they're certainly not at the stage where they need to be spending within cash flows but they've been very dilutive (as many shares outstanding as EOG) and have issued a moderate amount of debt to get to this point.  I know you can buy back shares and retire debt, but they're a long ways from being able to do that.  KOG is still a buy for me at this valuation, but it's not without risks.  People forget how cyclical oil prices can be, particularly when you consider the systemic risk in the market today.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 17:02:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I don't disagree with what you've said, they're certainly not at the stage where they need to be spending within cash flows but they've been very dilutive (as many shares outstanding as EOG) and have issued a moderate amount of debt to get to this point.  I know you can buy back shares and retire debt, but they're a long ways from being able to do that.  KOG is still a buy for me at this valuation, but it's not without risks.  People forget how cyclical oil prices can be, particularly when you consider the systemic risk in the market today.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Bakken And The Mississippian Lime: A Comparison</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/871491/comments?source=feed#comment-9553801</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9553801</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Good point, there's definitely analysis to be done there.  If you're curious, an easy way to get some preliminary data would be to dig through presentations of Lime companies and look at the upside price decks on their type curves.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:42:41 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Good point, there's definitely analysis to be done there.  If you're curious, an easy way to get some preliminary data would be to dig through presentations of Lime companies and look at the upside price decks on their type curves.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Bakken And The Mississippian Lime: A Comparison</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/871491/comments?source=feed#comment-9553701</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9553701</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for taking time to read the article and for the feedback guys.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:39:23 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for taking time to read the article and for the feedback guys.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Mississippi Lime: Reading Through Austex Results</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/820301/comments?source=feed#comment-8766261</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8766261</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Who are the &quot;smart oil investors&quot;?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 10:53:16 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Who are the &quot;smart oil investors&quot;?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Debt In The Oil And Gas Industry: How Much Is Too Much?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/722991/comments?source=feed#comment-7896331</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7896331</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The purpose of this piece was to show that the dynamics of an industry in part dictates a company's capital structure (You can choose to disagree with me on this point, but have some facts to back up your argument).  Because the oil and gas industry has characteristics of multiple industries, companies have different capital structure philosophies.  I did mention at the end that because of this, there's not a &quot;perfect capital structure&quot; for all companies. <br/><br/>Most companies borrow to finance leasehold acquisitions in the oil and gas industry.  SN has no debt because they are a start-up with very little production to borrow against.  <br/><br/>There are certainly other ways you can look at debt in the oil and gas industry.  If I was working in corporate finance for a company, I would create an index of similar sized companies and see how they are financing themselves.  For this analysis, I purposely looked at a broad mix of companies in hopes of finding an industry average.<br/><br/>I do appreciate the feedback though, thanks guys.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2012 15:07:16 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The purpose of this piece was to show that the dynamics of an industry in part dictates a company's capital structure (You can choose to disagree with me on this point, but have some facts to back up your argument).  Because the oil and gas industry has characteristics of multiple industries, companies have different capital structure philosophies.  I did mention at the end that because of this, there's not a &quot;perfect capital structure&quot; for all companies. <br/><br/>Most companies borrow to finance leasehold acquisitions in the oil and gas industry.  SN has no debt because they are a start-up with very little production to borrow against.  <br/><br/>There are certainly other ways you can look at debt in the oil and gas industry.  If I was working in corporate finance for a company, I would create an index of similar sized companies and see how they are financing themselves.  For this analysis, I purposely looked at a broad mix of companies in hopes of finding an industry average.<br/><br/>I do appreciate the feedback though, thanks guys.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
