coyotebait

Yahoo / Microsoft Deal Should Boost Bing

Two questions:

1. How oversold will YHOO get? $14.00, $12.00, $10.00, or less???

2. How much being overlooked?

The recent revamp of the Yahoo page shows Bartz & Co think they can monetize the indisputable power of YHOO (sticky eyeballs) in a new window of opportunity.

Right or wrong, they see customized news delivery on the NET as the future ---- rather than the futile attempt to compete with GOOG for advertisers on the search platform. ...MSFT has the money to try. Let's make a deal! ...To whatever extent MSFT is successful, it will contribute 88% to YHOO's bottom-line and relieve YHOO of the expenses thereof). Whether or not it's a good deal depends upon how Bartz deploys the benefits of an apparently bad deal.

With the demise of most news"papers" YHOO sees Internet news delivery, on-steroids, as the quickest, most practical, and most profitable way to monetize the power of YHOO's online presence.

On this platform whose time has come, advertisers will be able to target their audiences more accurately than ever before ---- what YouTube, FaceBook, and Twitter, have not yet been able to do, and will likely not be able to do nearly as well as YHOO.

Customized news delivery is the new and promising horizon for a new and more prosperous YHOO. ...MSFT-Bing revenues will finance it, securing an acceptable bottom-line (EARNINGS), as well as securing a solid level of cash flow, for the Bartz strategy to play out over the next 5-years.

Unfortunately most analysts and speculators don't have the bandwidth to understand the sound business strategies that this time-proven Autodesk-trained CEO is putting in place.

JMHO

CHOMPS,

^__^

..

Yahoo-Microsoft Deal: Long Term Merger Arbitrage?

Two questions:

1. How oversold will YHOO get? $14.00, $12.00, $10.00, or less???

2. How much being overlooked?

The recent revamp of the Yahoo page shows Bartz & Co think they can monetize the indisputable power of YHOO (sticky eyeballs) in a new window of opportunity.

Right or wrong, they see customized news delivery on the NET as the future ---- rather than the futile attempt to compete with GOOG for advertisers on the search platform. ...MSFT has the money to try. Let's make a deal! ...To whatever extent MSFT is successful, it will contribute 88% to YHOO's bottom-line and relieve YHOO of the expenses thereof). Whether or not it's a good deal depends upon how Bartz deploys the benefits of an apparently bad deal.

With the demise of most news"papers" YHOO sees Internet news delivery, on-steroids, as the quickest, most practical, and most profitable way to monetize the power of YHOO's online presence.

On this platform whose time has come, advertisers will be able to target their audiences more accurately than ever before ---- what YouTube, FaceBook, and Twitter, have not yet been able to do, and will likely not be able to do nearly as well as YHOO.

Customized news delivery is the new and promising horizon for a new and more prosperous YHOO. ...MSFT-Bing revenues will finance it, securing an acceptable bottom-line (EARNINGS), as well as securing a solid level of cash flow, for the Bartz strategy to play out over the next 5-years.

Unfortunately most analysts and speculators don't have the bandwidth to understand the sound business strategies that this time-proven Autodesk-trained CEO is putting in place.

JMHO

CHOMPS,

^__^

..

Yahoo-Microsoft Deal: Long Term Merger Arbitrage?

Two questions:

1. How oversold will YHOO get? $14.00, $12.00, $10.00, or less???

2. How much being overlooked?

The recent revamp of the Yahoo page shows Bartz & Co think they can monetize the indisputable power of YHOO (sticky eyeballs) in a new window of opportunity.

Right or wrong, they see customized news delivery on the NET as the future ---- rather than the futile attempt to compete with GOOG for advertisers on the search platform. ...MSFT has the money to try. Let's make a deal! ...To whatever extent MSFT is successful, it will contribute 88% to YHOO's bottom-line and relieve YHOO of the expenses thereof). Whether or not it's a good deal depends upon how Bartz deploys the benefits of an apparently bad deal.

With the demise of most news"papers" YHOO sees Internet news delivery, on-steroids, as the quickest, most practical, and most profitable way to monetize the power of YHOO's online presence.

On this platform whose time has come, advertisers will be able to target their audiences more accurately than ever before ---- what YouTube, FaceBook, and Twitter, have not yet been able to do, and will likely not be able to do nearly as well as YHOO.

Customized news delivery is the new and promising horizon for a new and more prosperous YHOO. ...MSFT-Bing revenues will finance it, securing an acceptable bottom-line (EARNINGS), as well as securing a solid level of cash flow, for the Bartz strategy to play out over the next 5-years.

Unfortunately most analysts and speculators don't have the bandwidth to understand the sound business strategies that this time-proven Autodesk-trained CEO is putting in place.

JMHO

CHOMPS,

^__^

..

Yahoo / Microsoft Deal Should Boost Bing

Two questions:

1. How oversold will YHOO get? $14.00, $12.00, $10.00, or less???

2. How much being overlooked?

The recent revamp of the Yahoo page shows Bartz & Co think they can monetize the indisputable power of YHOO (sticky eyeballs) in a new window of opportunity.

Right or wrong, they see customized news delivery on the NET as the future ---- rather than the futile attempt to compete with GOOG for advertisers on the search platform. ...MSFT has the money to try. Let's make a deal! ...To whatever extent MSFT is successful, it will contribute 88% to YHOO's bottom-line and relieve YHOO of the expenses thereof). Whether or not it's a good deal depends upon how Bartz deploys the benefits of an apparently bad deal.

With the demise of most news"papers" YHOO sees Internet news delivery, on-steroids, as the quickest, most practical, and most profitable way to monetize the power of YHOO's online presence.

On this platform whose time has come, advertisers will be able to target their audiences more accurately than ever before ---- what YouTube, FaceBook, and Twitter, have not yet been able to do, and will likely not be able to do nearly as well as YHOO.

Customized news delivery is the new and promising horizon for a new and more prosperous YHOO. ...MSFT-Bing revenues will finance it, securing an acceptable bottom-line (EARNINGS), as well as securing a solid level of cash flow, for the Bartz strategy to play out over the next 5-years.

Unfortunately most analysts and speculators don't have the bandwidth to understand the sound business strategies that this time-proven Autodesk-trained CEO is putting in place.

JMHO

CHOMPS,

^__^

..

Microsoft Wins, Yahoo Folds, Google Reigns

Two questions:

1. How oversold will YHOO get? $14.00, $12.00, $10.00, or less???

2. How much being overlooked?

The recent revamp of the Yahoo page shows Bartz & Co think they can monetize the indisputable power of YHOO (sticky eyeballs) in a new window of opportunity.

Right or wrong, they see customized news delivery on the NET as the future ---- rather than the futile attempt to compete with GOOG for advertisers on the search platform. ...MSFT has the money to try. Let's make a deal! ...To whatever extent MSFT is successful, it will contribute 88% to YHOO's bottom-line and relieve YHOO of the expenses thereof). Whether or not it's a good deal depends upon how Bartz deploys the benefits of an apparently bad deal.

With the demise of most news"papers" YHOO sees Internet news delivery, on-steroids, as the quickest, most practical, and most profitable way to monetize the power of YHOO's online presence.

On this platform whose time has come, advertisers will be able to target their audiences more accurately than ever before ---- what YouTube, FaceBook, and Twitter, have not yet been able to do, and will likely not be able to do nearly as well as YHOO.

Customized news delivery is the new and promising horizon for a new and more prosperous YHOO. ...MSFT-Bing revenues will finance it, securing an acceptable bottom-line (EARNINGS), as well as securing a solid level of cash flow, for the Bartz strategy to play out over the next 5-years.

Unfortunately most analysts and speculators don't have the bandwidth to understand the sound business strategies that this time-proven Autodesk-trained CEO is putting in place.

JMHO

CHOMPS,

^__^

..

Who Is the Winner in the Yahoo / Microsoft Deal; Does It Hurt Google ?

Two questions:

1. How oversold will YHOO get? $14.00, $12.00, $10.00, or less???

2. How much being overlooked?

The recent revamp of the Yahoo page shows Bartz & Co think they can monetize the indisputable power of YHOO (sticky eyeballs) in a new window of opportunity.

Right or wrong, they see customized news delivery on the NET as the future ---- rather than the futile attempt to compete with GOOG for advertisers on the search platform. ...MSFT has the money to try. Let's make a deal! ...To whatever extent MSFT is successful, it will contribute 88% to YHOO's bottom-line and relieve YHOO of the expenses thereof). Whether or not it's a good deal depends upon how Bartz deploys the benefits of an apparently bad deal.

With the demise of most news"papers" YHOO sees Internet news delivery, on-steroids, as the quickest, most practical, and most profitable way to monetize the power of YHOO's online presence.

On this platform whose time has come, advertisers will be able to target their audiences more accurately than ever before ---- what YouTube, FaceBook, and Twitter, have not yet been able to do, and will likely not be able to do nearly as well as YHOO.

Customized news delivery is the new and promising horizon for a new and more prosperous YHOO. ...MSFT-Bing revenues will finance it, securing an acceptable bottom-line (EARNINGS), as well as securing a solid level of cash flow, for the Bartz strategy to play out over the next 5-years.

Unfortunately most analysts and speculators don't have the bandwidth to understand the sound business strategies that this time-proven Autodesk-trained CEO is putting in place.

JMHO

CHOMPS,

^__^

..

Yahoo Got Binged on Microsoft Search Deal

Two questions:

1. How oversold will YHOO get? $14.00, $12.00, $10.00, or less???

2. How much being overlooked?

The recent revamp of the Yahoo page shows Bartz & Co think they can monetize the indisputable power of YHOO (sticky eyeballs) in a new window of opportunity.

Right or wrong, they see customized news delivery on the NET as the future ---- rather than the futile attempt to compete with GOOG for advertisers on the search platform. ...MSFT has the money to try. Let's make a deal! ...To whatever extent MSFT is successful, it will contribute 88% to YHOO's bottom-line and relieve YHOO of the expenses thereof). Whether or not it's a good deal depends upon how Bartz deploys the benefits of an apparently bad deal.

With the demise of most news"papers" YHOO sees Internet news delivery, on-steroids, as the quickest, most practical, and most profitable way to monetize the power of YHOO's online presence.

On this platform whose time has come, advertisers will be able to target their audiences more accurately than ever before ---- what YouTube, FaceBook, and Twitter, have not yet been able to do, and will likely not be able to do nearly as well as YHOO.

Customized news delivery is the new and promising horizon for a new and more prosperous YHOO. ...MSFT-Bing revenues will finance it, securing an acceptable bottom-line (EARNINGS), as well as securing a solid level of cash flow, for the Bartz strategy to play out over the next 5-years.

Unfortunately most analysts and speculators don't have the bandwidth to understand the sound business strategies that this time-proven Autodesk-trained CEO is putting in place.

JMHO

CHOMPS,

^__^

..

About That Google Earnings Beat...

Thank you.

^__^

..

Google: Off to the Races?

All well and good, except for the fact that Eric S is beginning to act like a bloated pig, with disregard for shareholder value, by way of the piggy-pay packages of senior execs, most notably himself. Bonuses when the stock has tanked, and obscenely diluting the shares with the option reevaluation scam.

Suuuuuweeeeee Pig-Pig-PIGGY.

Chompdatgreedychump,

^__^

..

The Strategic Threats Facing Google

Interesting speculations on the darkside of Google, but the sky isn't falling ...yet.

Soooooo, are they a fat sitting duck - or are a nimble-footed moving target, capable of monetizing their considerable assets to an even higher level?

Agreed, they act like the duck, but have the critical mass to continue to lead.

CHOMPS,

^__^

..

Why It's a Good Time to Buy Google

Faisal,

Too right.

If you can't buy Google at this level, you shouldn't be buying anything but gold (or Akamai?).

The soon-to-be ubiquitous global utility we call the Internet is essential to recovery; Internet advertising is essential to nearly all would-be survivors of the crunch, a place where Google Search is, for the foreseeable future, the undethronable king.

In the recovery era of the Great Depression, GM and Ford never looked so good. Then recovery was the industrial revolution fueled by the productivity of the production-line; today's recovery will depend upon the technological revolution, to be fueled by the productivity of the Internet to reach people instantaneously with whatever good or services a company wants to sell. ...Google is a screaming buy.

Disclosure: Long GOOG and AKAM. Looking to accumulate AMZN and AAPL (and gold) on weakness.

CHOMPS,

^__^

..

Google Ventures Ready to Launch: Not the Best Use of Capital

Erick,

Well said.

That said, now looks like an unusually good time to be starting up a venture fund, if you have an enormous excess of cash, in the face of the incredible inflation we are about to see. ...Maybe they would be better off buying gold?

Only time will tell, whether Google's gambling instincts are more productive to shareholder value than the responsibility to reward shareholders with dividends.

CHOMPS,

^__^

..

Could Facebook Surpass Google One Day?

Julia,

Nice, very nice. You are as clever as you are beautiful.

^__^

..

Long Google, Again

When Eric Schmitt says things are pretty bad "out there" he means outside his inner circle of greedy pigs that have just dipped into the rich coffers of the company for millions in bonuses. Shareholders are locked in the mushroom closet (suckers only need apply).

WHAT A DOUBLE-TALKING PUTZ.
CHOMPDATCHUMP,

^__^
..

Should Google Be Paying a Dividend?

How much of that $20 Billion may be needed for future acquisition is the issue. With the sheer size and growth potential of the global Internet, at this point no one knows.

That said, corporate management of many companies and their Boards of Directors are raiding their treasuries to enrich themselves with their own versions of "dividending."

The #1 enemy of Wall Street today is top-level management personal greed. And enormous cash reserves give them comfort to know, for them, the candy will never run out. Imho, it is obscene for anyone to make more than $1 Million a year, bonuses not to exceed same. For a company with public shareholders, it is shameful.

...Shareholders foot the bill and tolerate continual perpetual dilution from stock options, in the futile hope of preserving or growing their hard-earned cash, many retirees in dire straits, and we have to dodge hedgefund managers and all manner of short-term sharks in the bargain. And how do we do that from the played out, over-harvested, mushroom bin corporate mangement keeps us in? ...How can a shareholder feel anything but fleeced?

A shout out to Eric for a heads up article.

CHOMPS,

^__^

..