Evidentially, in China, the costs of installing twice as much is offset by the price and ease of such installation. In America however, even deflated property prices should still warrant the use of the proven monocrystaline which will hopefully be robotically mass produced to actually compete.
What about the CIGS tech? Isn't that the "cheapest" thinfilm due to its higher efficiencies and printing press production?
-
Evidentially, in China, the costs of installing twice as much is offset by the price and ease of such installation. In America however, even deflated property prices should still warrant the use of the proven monocrystaline which will hopefully be robotically mass produced to actually compete.
Nov 02 11:20 am
|Rating:
0
0
All Comments by fireofenergy »Picking Solar Energy Winners [View article]
What about the CIGS tech? Isn't that the "cheapest" thinfilm due to its higher efficiencies and printing press production?