Lead Acid Batteries: How Cheap Beat Cool at Google [View article]
terribly french? in my eyes not really a problem... france is doing a very good job in the whole energy sector since many decades. they have a lot of competency in the uranium (nuclear power) field as well as wind turbines and will probably doing well in the energy storage sector. SAFT is one of the few battery producers that is very well diversified and not only focusing "mainly" on one single technology. furthermore, it’s an European company which is valued in a (probably) far more steady currency than its peers abroad...
On Apr 15 07:22 AM John Petersen wrote:
> Matt_the_Batt, it's even good news for Li-ion skeptics like me because > repurposing an existing plant is far cheaper than building a new > one from the ground up. I've always shied away from commenting on > JCI because it's so terribly diversified and SAFT because it's so > terribly French, but they're both fine companies with long-established > manufacturing expertise in the sector. They also carry much more > reasonable valuations than some of the princes.
Why do you think are the SAFT Group and ABB currently developing Li-ion-based energy storage systems, if this technology is, according to you, too much expensive? debutants?
The Heart of Cleantech Sells at 50% Discount to the Broader Market [View article]
aalan, which is the (one) company you think will have most success in mid-term future?
On Dec 11 01:55 PM Aalan wrote:
> Thanks for the reply, John. I think that gives us a better perspective. > I'll take those 5 (or at least one); you can keep the 9 that are > unprofitable. > In a season when analysts are slashing estimates by 40-60% all over > the place, forward PEs are meaningless.
Sort by:
Latest | Highest ratedLead Acid Batteries: How Cheap Beat Cool at Google [View article]
www.saftbatteries.com/...
Lead Acid Batteries: How Cheap Beat Cool at Google [View article]
On Apr 15 07:22 AM John Petersen wrote:
> Matt_the_Batt, it's even good news for Li-ion skeptics like me because
> repurposing an existing plant is far cheaper than building a new
> one from the ground up. I've always shied away from commenting on
> JCI because it's so terribly diversified and SAFT because it's so
> terribly French, but they're both fine companies with long-established
> manufacturing expertise in the sector. They also carry much more
> reasonable valuations than some of the princes.
Lithium-ion Batteries: 9 Years of Price Stagnation [View article]
On Apr 06 08:17 AM John Petersen wrote:
> Douglas, I'm very interested in compressed air and its potential
> and even own a few shares of ACPW that have performed very well.
Li-ion Battery Manufacturers: The Bleeding Edge of Energy Storage Technology [View article]
www.basf.com/group/pre...
Li-ion Battery Manufacturers: The Bleeding Edge of Energy Storage Technology [View article]
SAFT/JCI is going to produce the Li-ion battery for the Mercedes S Class Hybrid!
See the SAFT results presentation (page 25)
www.saftbatteries.com/...
Li-ion Battery Manufacturers: The Bleeding Edge of Energy Storage Technology [View article]
Lead Carbon Batteries: A Game Changer for Alt Energy Storage - Part II [View article]
www.pocket-lint.com/ne...
Long Live the Cleantech Revolution [View article]
Lead-Acid, Lead-Carbon Batteries: The Only Option for Average Consumer [View article]
www.saftbatteries.com/...
ABB Poised to Benefit from Global Bailout Plans [View article]
ABB Ltd: A Look at Electricity Infrastructure [View article]
news.morningstar.com/n...
ABB Ltd: A Look at Electricity Infrastructure [View article]
The Heart of Cleantech Sells at 50% Discount to the Broader Market [View article]
Thank you!
The Heart of Cleantech Sells at 50% Discount to the Broader Market [View article]
The Heart of Cleantech Sells at 50% Discount to the Broader Market [View article]
On Dec 11 01:55 PM Aalan wrote:
> Thanks for the reply, John. I think that gives us a better perspective.
> I'll take those 5 (or at least one); you can keep the 9 that are
> unprofitable.
> In a season when analysts are slashing estimates by 40-60% all over
> the place, forward PEs are meaningless.